政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/84899

政大典藏 > College of Liberal Arts > Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies > Theses > Item 140.119/84899

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/84899

Title:	檔案資訊描述標準MARC AMC與EAD之比較與格式對映研究
Authors:	王麗蕉
Contributors:	薛理桂王麗蕉
Keywords:	檔案描述標準檔案與手稿機讀編目格式檔案描述編碼格式 Archival descriptive standard MARC AMC EAD
Date:	2001
Issue Date:	2016-04-15 16:01:05 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	「檔案描述」是檔案管理過程中最基礎的工作，目的在於將具有價值的資料組織、整理，以提供便利的資訊檢索工具。標準的制定在於促使具有價值性的資料可相互交流與分享。美國檔案管理專業，對於檔案描述格式標準之規範，從一九八○年代檔案與手稿機讀編目格式(MARC AMC)，到一九九○年代制定的檔案描述編碼標準(EAD)，對於發展檔案描述資料結構標準化工作，皆能隨資訊網路的進步與發展，既能符合檔案資料特質，又能滿足使用者日新月異的資訊需求。反觀國內檔案管理有關檔案描述作業缺乏統一架構標準，為使國內檔案界在制定相關中文檔案與手稿描述標準有一明確的參考依據，而進行本研究。本研究採用比較法與實作方式，運用比較法分析MARC AMC與EAD發展背景、主要功能、描述層級、描述資訊、實際應用等比較項目的異同之處。分析MARC AMC與EAD描述項目對映結果，再以中文機關檔案與個人手稿，分別利用MARC AMC與EAD加以描述，實際分析二種描述記錄間轉換的可行模式。研究結果有四項：一、MARC AMC能有效控制檔案館館藏資訊，採用MARC AMC作為描述規範的檔案資訊非常豐富；二、EAD徹底實行檔案”控制層次”，利用檔案”多層次描述”特質；三、MARC AMC與EAD描述項目大都可相對應；四、由於機關檔案與個人手稿的層次編排上的差異，MARC AMC與EAD的轉換需分別進行，但二種描述標準所建立的記錄是可轉換的。建議共有五項：一、國內應成立制定檔案描述標準的專責組織；二、分別建立中文檔案與手稿機讀編目格式與中文檔案描述編碼標準；三、研究國內檔案資源層次控制的應用；四、制定中文檔案與手稿描述規則；五、建立全國性檔案館藏聯合目錄與全國性檔案查檢工具計畫。
Reference:	一、英文書目 “A Review of Metadata: a Survey of Current Resource Description Formats” <http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/desire/overview/rev_01.html> (cited 1999/11/15) “Background Information on EAD: Development of the Encoded Archival Description Document Type Definition” (cited 1999/11/15) “DESIRE Handbook: Section2, Subject Specialists and Information Managers.” <http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/desire/handbook/drafts/metadata/intro.html> (cited 2000/2/17) “Monticello Electronic Library: Dublin Core Element Set Crosswalk” 1997. <http://www.oclc.org:5046/~emiller/DC/crosswalk.html>(cited 2000/3/23) Bellardo, Lewis & Lynn Lady Bellardo, A Glossary for Archivists, Manuscript Curators, and Records Managers, Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 1992. Bouche, Nicole L., “Implementing EAD in the Yale University Library.” American Archivist, 60(Fall 1997),408-419. Bradsher, J. G. (Ed.), Managing Archives and Archival Institutions, Chicago: University of Chicago, 1989. Brunton, Paul & Tim Robinson, “Arrangement and Description.” In: Judith Ellis (Ed.) Keeping Archives, Victoria: The Australian Society of Archivists Inc., 1993, 222-247. Cook, Michael “The British Move Toward Standards of Archival Description: the MAD Standard.” American Archivist, 54(Winter 1990),130-139. Day, Michael, “Metadata: Mapping Between Metadata Formats.” ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/interoperability> (cited 2000/2/17) Derose, Steven J. “Navigation, Access, and Control Using Structured Information.” American Archivist, 60(Summer 1997),298-309. Dow, Eizabeth H. “EAD and the Small Repository.” American Archivist, 60(Fall 1997): 446-455. Duff, Wendy & Penka Stoyanova, “Transforming the Crazy Quilt: Archival Displays from a User’ Point of View.” Archivaria, 45(1997), 44-79. Duff, Wendy M. & Kent M. Haworth, “Advancing Archival Description: a Model for Rationalising North American Description Standards.” Archives and Manuscripts, 25:2(Nov. 1997),194-217. EAD Cookbook, , (cited 2001/3/5) EAD Help Pages-EAD Sites Annotated, sitesann.html>, (cited 2001/4/23). Edgecombe, Jennifer “Finding Aids.” In: Judith Ellis (Ed.) Keeping Archives, Victoria: The Australian Society of Archivists Inc., 1993, 248-272. Encoded Archival Description Working Group of the Society of American Archivist & Network Development and MARC Standard Office of the Library of Congress, Encoded Archival Description: Tag Library Version 1.0, Chicago: SAA, 1998. Encoded Archival Description Working Group of the Society of American Archivist, Encoded Archival Description: Application Guidelines Version 1.0, Chicago: SAA, 1999. Evans, Max J. & Lisa B. Weber, MARC For Archives and Manuscripts: a Compendium of Practice, Madison: The Historical Society of Wisconsin, 1985. Feeney, Kathleen “Retrieval of Archival Finding Aids Using World-Wide-Web Search Engines.” American Archivist, 62(Fall 1999),206-228. Fox, Michael “Descriptive Cataloging for Archival Materials.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 11:3-4(1990):17-34. Fox, Michael J. “Implementing Encoded Archival Description: An Overview of Administrative and Technical Considerations.” American Archivist, 60(Summer 1997),330-343. Gracy, David B., Archives and Manuscripts: Arrangement and Description, Chicago: SAA, 1977. Hensen, Steven L. “NISTF II and EAD: the Evolution of Archival Description.” American Archivist, 60(Summer 1997),284-296. Hensen, Steven L. “The Use of Standards in the Application of the AMC Format.” American Archivist, 49:1(Winter 1986),31-40. Hunter, G. S. Developing and Maintaining Practical Archives, New York: Neal-Schuman Pub. Inc, 1997. Kesner, Richard M. “ Information Resource Management in the Electronic Workplace: A Personal Perspective on “Archives in the Information Society.” American Archivist, 61(Spring 1998),70-87. Kiesling, Kris “EAD as Archival Description Standard.” American Archivist, 60(Summer 1997),344-354. Lacy, Mary A. and Anne Mitchell, “EAD Testing and Implementation at the Library of Congress.” American Archivist, 60(Fall 1997),420-435. MARBI & Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library of Congress, The MARC 21 Formats: Background and Principles, 96principl.html>, (cited 2001/6/27) Matters, Marion Introduction to the USMARC Format for Archival and Manuscripts Control, Chicago: The Society of American Archivist, 1990. McKemmish, Sue “Introducting Archives and Archival Programs.” In Judith Ellis (Ed.) Keeping Archives, Victoria: The Australian Society of Archivists Inc., 1993, 1-24. Meissner, Dennis “First Things: Reengineering Finding Aids for Implementation of EAD.” American Archivist, 60(Fall 1997),372-387. Miller, Fredric M., Arranging and Describing archives and Manuscripts, Chicago: SAA, 1990. Morris, Leslie A. “Developing a Cooperative Intra-institutional Approach to EAD Implementation: the Harvard/Radcliffe Digital Finding Aids Project.” American Archivist, 60(Fall 1997),388-407. Morton, Katharine “The MARC Formats: An Overview.” American Archivist, 49:1(Winter 1986),21-30. Network Development & MARC Standards Office, Library of congress, “Encoded Archival Description Sites on the Web”html> (cited 1999/11/15) Piche, Jean-Stephen “Doing What’s Possible with What We’ve Got: Using the World Wide Wed to Integrate Archival Functions.” American Archivist, 61(Spring 1998),106-122. Pitti, Daniel V., “Encoded Archival Description: An Introduction and Overview.” D-Lib Magazine, 5:11(November 1999), 11pitti.html> (cited 2000/4/3) Pitti, Daniel V., “Encoded Archival Description: the Development of an Encoding Standard for Archival Finding Aids”, American Archivist, 60:2(1997), 279-283. Rinehart, Richard, Museums and the Online Archive of California: Museum Consortia, Digital Library Projects, Standards for Complex Multimedia Objects and More Fun than a Barrel of Monkeys, standards/index.html>, (cited 2001/5/2) Russell, Rosemary & Andy Powell, “Collection Level Description: A review of existing practice.” 1998, collec~1.htm#_Toc426455710> (2000/4/17) Ruth, Janice E., “Encoded Archival Description: A Structural Overview.” American Archivist, 60:2(1997),317-327. Sahli, Nancy A., “Interpretation and Application of the AMC Format.” American Archivist, 49:1(1986),9-20. Scheelenberg, T. R., The Management of Archives, Washington, DC: NARA, 1998. Seaman, David “Multi-institutional EAD: the University of Virginia’s Role in the American Heritage Project.” American Archivist, 60(Fall 1997),436-444. Smiraglia, Richard P. (ed.), Describing Archival Materials: The Use of the MARC AMC Format, New York: The Haworth Press, 1990. Smith, MacKenzie, “DFAS: The Distributed Finding Aid Search System.” D-Lib Magazine, 6:1(January 2000), html> (cited 2000/4/3). Society of American Archivist, “Standards for Archival Description: Chapter2.” 1994. (cited1999/6/6) Society of American Archivist, “Standards for Archival Description: Chapter3.” 1994. (cited 1999/6/6) Society of American Archivist, “Standards for Archival Description: Chapter4.” 1994. (cited 1999/6/6) Society of American Archivist, “Standards for Archival Description: Chapter5.” 1994. (cited 1999/6/6) Society of American Archivist, “Standards for Archival Description: Chapter6.” 1994. (cited 1999/6/6) Society of American Archivist, “Standards for Archival Description: Introduction.” 1994. html>(cited1999/6/6) Society of American Archivists, A Basic Glossary for Archivists, Manuscript Curators, and Records Managers, Chicago: SAA, 1974. Taylor, Arlene G., The Organization of Information, Englewood, Colo: Libraries Unlimited, 1999. The UK Office for Library and Information Networking, “A Review of Metadata：a Survey of Current Resource Description Formats.” desire/overview/rev_01.htm> (cited 2000/2/17) UKOLN Metadata Group, “Encoding Archival Description (EAD).” 1998, www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/desire/overview/rev_06.htm> (2000/2/17) UKOLN Metadata Group, “MARC (General Overview).” 1998, uk/metadata/desire/overview/rev_14.htm> (2000/2/17) Weber, Lisa B. “Archival Description Standards: Concepts, Principles, and Methodologies.” American Archivist, 52:4(Fall 1989),504-513. Weber, Lisa B. “The ‘other’ USMARC Formats: Authorities and Holdings. Do We Care to be Partner in the Dance, too?” American Archivist, 54(Winter 1990),44-51. WGSAD, “ Recommendations of the Working Group on Standards for Archival Description.” American Archivist, 52 (Fall 1989),462-477. WGSAD, “Report of the Working Group on Standards for Archival Description.” American Archivist, 52 (Fall 1989),440-461. WGSAD, “Standards for Archival Description: Introduction.” archivists.org/publications/stds99/intro.html >(cited 1999/6/5) Wool, Gregory, "A Meditation on Metadata." The Serials Librarian, 33:1/2(1998), 167-178. Xu, Amanda, "Metadata Conversion and the Library OPAC." The Serials Librarian, 33:1/2(1998): 179-196. 二、中文書目「相關詮釋資料之介紹與比較」。資源組織與檢索之規範。tw/achievement/metadata,htm>。(cited 2001/4/16) 李光華主持。全國檔案資訊系統之規劃。台北市：國家檔案局籌備處，民89。(RDEC-NA-089-046合作研究報告)。吳政叡。「都柏林核心集到中國機讀編目格式的轉換對照表」。中國圖書館學會會報。第60期(民國87年)，頁61-73。吳政叡。機讀編目格式在都柏林核心集的應用探討。台北市：台灣學生書局，民國87年。胡歐蘭。「二十一世紀機讀編目格式的發展」。在：華文書目資料庫合作發展研討會論文集。台北市：國家圖書館，民89年。頁303-320。柯皓仁、黃夙賢、楊維邦。「詮釋資料與數位圖書館系統互通性之探討」。大學圖書館。5卷1期(民國90年3月)，頁49-78。徐子淵譯。XML 1.0 Spec中文規格書。台北市：經濟部，民89年。徐金芬。「比較與國際書館學研究方法之探討」。圖書館學與資訊科學。16:1(民國79年4月)，頁60-79。黃富三等主編。臺灣史檔案．文書目錄。台北市：台灣大學，民86年。陳昭珍。「從使用者需求與文獻特性看圖書館界資訊組織模式發展趨勢」21世紀資訊科學與技術的展望學術研討會論文集。台北市：世新大學圖書資訊學系，民87年)。陳昭珍。「電子資訊的組織模式」。圖書館學刊。12期(民國86年12月)，頁161-182。陳昭珍。電子圖書館整合檢索之理論與實作。台北市：文華圖書，民89。陳雪華、張玉欣。「台大電子圖書館與博物館數位化資源之組織」。圖書館學與資訊科學。第23卷2期(民國87年)，頁51-65。陳雪華、陳昭珍、陳光華。「數位圖書館/博物院中詮釋資料之理論與實作」。圖書館學刊。第13期(民國87年12月)，頁37-59。陳雪華。「網路資源之組織與整理」。圖書館學刊。第12期(民國86年12月)，頁19-37。陳瑩芳。美國政府資訊指引服務之研究。台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所。碩士論文，民88年。國史館。資源委員會檔案。< http://academia.drnh.gov.tw/ddrnh2/1223.htm>，(cited 2001/4/15)。國史館。閻錫山檔案。< http://academia.drnh.gov.tw/ddrnh2/1232.htm>，(cited 2001/4/15)。國科會數位博物館專案推廣辦公室。2001年科會數位博物館國際研習會—美國經驗。台北市：臺灣大學圖書館國際會議廳，民國90年5月24日至5月25日。國家圖書館Metadata研究小組編撰。中文詮釋資料(Metadata)格式彙編。台北市：國家圖書館，民89年。趙雲龍。圖書館學研究與方法。北京市：兵器工業出版社，1993。賴麗雯。檔案描述編碼格式(EAD)在中文檔案應用之研究。政治大學圖書資訊學研究所，碩士論文，民89。薛理桂。「檔案描述編碼格式(EAD)之發展與實施」。圖書與資訊學刊。28期(民國88年2月)，頁49-62。薛理桂。中文檔案機讀編目格式之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。民國86年8月1日至87年7月31日。(計畫編號：NSC 87-2411-H-004-014)。薛理桂。我國檔案編目現況與中文檔案編目規則擬訂之研究(I) 。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。民國87年8月1日至88年7月31日。(計畫編號：NSC 88-2413-H-004-013)。顏嘉惠。特殊主題資訊之metadata比較研究。輔仁大學圖書資訊學研究所，碩士論文，民國87。羅思嘉。「數位圖書館資源組織與整理：機讀編目格式與Dublin Core」。大學圖書館。第3期。 (cited 200/2/17)。
Description:	碩士國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001087
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
index.html	0Kb	HTML2	495	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...