|Abstract: ||本計畫擬由現代不同類型服務提供契約之當事人權 利義務內容衍生之法律爭議為研究探討之範圍，以五大主 軸為本計畫研究核心，囊括金融服務、醫療契約、會計師 與律師等專業服務契約、建築設計契約，透過實務判決的 評析、學說見解的比較，以比較法途徑提出德國見解法相 關理論與實務見解，以供司法實務運作之參考。 首先，就金融服務而言，非現金之付款工具則亦衍生 諸多錯誤付款，偽卡之冒用等爭議問題。尤值注意者係， 理財服務應否依誠信原則在個案中對投資人負有保護、照 顧、考慮之附隨義務而負損害賠償責任，亦屬另一新興法 律爭議問題。其次，就醫療契約之相關爭議，亦即醫療院 所應否依消保法第 7條負無過失責任之爭議。此外，律師、 會計師、建築師等專門職業技術人員提供之服務是否為委 任契約或為承攬契約，或應否依民法第 184條第 2項對第 三人負民事侵權責任在實務上亦屬爭議之問題。關於建築 設計契約，實務上對於設計監造契約究屬「承攬契約」抑 或係「委任契約」之性質，向來見解分歧，本文擬深入探 究之。 綜上所述，本文將以大陸法系之活水源頭-即誠信原 則導出在現代型專業服務之具體案例中，應負之資訊告 知、照顧、保護之義務，並探討受任人附隨義務之具體化 內容，以供未來實務運作與相關立法之參考。|
This project plan to take different kinds of service-provider contracts in modern society, which produce controversial issues deriving from the content of litigant's right and obligation as researching and discussing categories. In this study, there are five main subjects, including financial service, medical service, accountant and lawyer service, and architecture design contract. By analyzing the practical cases and comparing the theories, and also using the comparing way to bring up German views to shorten the distances between the theoretical ideas and practical practices, this study will offer some practical suggestions in order to achieve the purpose of researching. First, as to the financial service contract, consuming with credit card will might lead to disputes such as wrongly payment, counterfeited credit cards and the liability of investment management. Second, as to the medical service, not only for burden of proof, medical civil liability is also controversial. The study will analyze whether applying for the Consumer Protection Law Article 7 or not. Third, as to the accountant and lawyer service, the study will research into the contract belonging to Civil Code Article 490 or Article 528. Furthermore, torts compensation liability is also significant. Moreover, the study will discuss the rights and obligations between the parties while the registered person disposes the properties and changes ownerships or the third party obey the Bona Fide Acquisition. Last but not the least, the research will analyze whether architecture design contract shall apply Civil Code Article 490 or Article 528. To sum up, service-provider contracts in modern society shall be exercised in accordance with the means of good faith. Based on these results, the researcher proposes concrete suggestions for the court and legislation.