English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25784606      Online Users : 156
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/85999
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/85999


    Title: 法與道德--德沃京對法實證主義分離命題之批判
    Law and morality--Ronald Dworkin's critique of the separation thesis of legal positivism
    Authors: 許家馨
    Hsu, Chia-hsin
    Contributors: 顏厥安
    Yen Chueh-an, associate professor of law, National Taiwan university
    許家馨
    Hsu, Chia-hsin
    Keywords: 法實證主義
    自然法論
    規則與原則
    承認規則
    德沃京
    哈特
    詮釋性法理論
    法與道德
    legal positivism
    natural law
    rule and principle
    rule of recognition
    Ronald Dworkin
    H. L. A. Hart
    interpretive theory of law
    law and morality
    Date: 1998
    Issue Date: 2016-04-22 13:44:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文總共分為三部分,共八章。
    Abstract
    "封面頁
    證明書
    目錄
    第一章 緒論
    1.1 研究問題及目的
    1.2 盧曼的社會學理論:自我生產的社會系統
    1.2.1 觀察
    1.2.2 溝通
    1.2.3 功能分化的社會系統
    1.2.4 小結
    第二章 盧曼風險社會學
    2.1 風險概念
    2.2 風險社會
    2.2.1 時間
    2.2.2 技術
    2.3 符碼化與風險溝通
    2.4 小結
    第三章 風險社會中的法律系統
    3.1 風險與法律
    3.2 法律作為系統
    3.2.1 法律系統的功能
    3.2.2 法律系統與環境
    3.3 風險議題與功能次系統(以政治、法律與經濟為例)
    3.4 小結
    第四章 法律控制風險的可能性
    4.1 民主原則與風險溝通
    4.2 法律形式與風險決策
    4.2.1 結果取向的法律決策
    4.2.2 程序化的法律調控
    4.3 小結
    第五章 結論:法律形式無法解決風險問題
    5.1 系統理論的批判潛力
    5.2 法律形式無法解決風險問題:以民法增訂條文第191條之3為例
    參考書目
    Reference: 德沃京(Ronald Dworkin)的著作
    * Judicial Discretion, Journal of Philosophy, vol.60, 1963, pp.624-638
    * Does Law Have a Function? , The Yale Law Journal, vol.74, 1965, pp.640-651
    * No Right Answer? , New York Univ. Law Review, vol.53, No.1, 1978, pp.1-32
    * Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard Univ. Press, 1978
    * ‘Natural’ Law Visited, University of Florida Law Review, vol.34, 1982, pp.165-188
    * A Matter of Principle, Harvard Univ. Press, 1985
    * Law’s Empire, Harvard Univ. Press, 1986
    哈特(H. L. A. Hart)的著作
    * Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals, Harvard Law Review, vol.71, 1958
    * The Concept of Law, Oxford, 1961
    * Essays on Bentham—Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Philosophy, Oxford, 1982
    * Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, Oxford, 1983
    * The Concept of Law, Oxford, 1994, 2nd ed., with Postscript
    中文文獻
    王文宇 論德沃京的司法判決理論,台大法學論叢第二十五卷第二期
    王伯琦 近代法律思潮與中國固有文化,台北法務通訊雜誌社,民國八十二年五版
    王效文 法論證與修辭學—Chaim Perelman新修辭學法理論之研究,國立政治大學法研所碩士論文,民國八十六年
    王鵬翔 規範與邏輯,國立政治大學法研所碩士論文,民國八十七年
    李冠宜 法之正確性宣稱—評介RobertAlexy的正確性論述,發表於一九九九年台大基礎法學工作室主辦,法理學復活節研討會裁量、詮釋與論證—司法裁判客觀性之研究,台大法研所碩士論文,一九九九年
    阮文泉 德沃金法律建構解釋理論之研究,國立台灣大學法研所碩士論文,民國八十二年
    何建志 法律的意義與詮釋,國立台灣大學法研所碩士論文,民國八十二年
    林山田 論刑事程序原則,台大法學論叢,第二十八卷第二期,民國八十八年
    林文雄 法實證主義,一九九三年,第五版
    孫效智 道德論證問題在基本倫理學上的發展—目的論與義務論之爭,哲學與文化,廿二卷第四期,1995
    范光棣 維根斯坦,台北東大,1994
    郭銘松 從財產權的思想典範論現代憲法功能的變遷,發表於一九九九年台大基礎法學工作室主辦,法理學復活節研討會
    高如應 哈特的法律理論—從法概念到司法裁量的理論構成,台大法研所碩士論文,民國八十七年
    張文顯 二十世紀西方法哲學思潮研究,法律出版社,北京,1996
    張旺山 由「國家理性」思想論近代國家的發展與本質,收於「哲學論文集」,國科會人文處、中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所出版,一九九八年十二月韋伯的價值多神論,收於多元主義—政治思想論文集,中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所,一九九八年三月
    陳新民 國家的法治主義—英國的法治(The Rule of Law)與德國法治國家(Der Rechsstaat)之概念,台大法學論叢,第二十八卷第一期,民國八十七年
    陳瑞麟 說話行動論的意義和意力,國立編譯館館刊,第二十三卷第一期,民國八十三年論哈伯瑪斯的普遍語用學,收於現代哲學—理論與批判,曾慶豹、溫明麗編,台北師大書苑,民國八十八年
    葉俊榮 從國家發展與憲法變遷論大法官的釋憲機能:一九四九至一九九八,台大法學論叢,第二十八卷第二期,民國八十八年
    翁岳生 行政法與現代法治國家,作者自印,一九九0
    馬漢寶 西洋法律思想論集,台北漢林,民國七十四年
    黃茂榮 法學方法與現代民法,增訂版,台北,一九八七
    黃瑞祺 批判社會學—批判理論與現代社會學,台北三民,民國八十五年
    蔡宗珍 合法性與正當性的辯證—追尋卡爾•史密特1932年的思想軌跡,當代,一九九七年12月號
    顏厥安 法效力與法解釋—由Habermas及Kaufmann的法效理論檢討法學知識的性質,台大法學論叢第二十七卷第一期,民國八十六年論法哲學的範圍及其主要問題法與道德—由一個法哲學的核心問題檢討德國戰後法思想的發展法理性與論證—Robert Alexy的法論證理論法概念與實踐理性—德國法理學理論近年發展之介紹再訪法實證主義(以上論文皆收於氏著法概念與實踐理性,允晨,台北,民國八十七年)法體系的統一性與多元社會,多元主義—政治思想論文集,中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所,一九九八年三月
    戴東雄 從法實證主義之觀點論中國法家思想,台北,民國七十八年
    戴森雄 奧斯丁法律與道德論之研究,收於法理學論叢—紀念楊日然教授,月旦,台北,一九九七
    博登海默,結構群編譯 法理學—法哲學及其方法,民國七十九年
    韋伯著,顧忠華譯 社會學的基本概念,台北遠流,民國八十二年
    Robert Alexy 著,程明修譯 作為主觀權利與客觀規範之基本權,憲政時代,第二十四卷第四期,民國八十八年
    Bryan Magee編,周穗明等人譯 當代哲學對話錄(下),台灣商務,一九九四
    Hans Georg Gadamer著,洪漢鼎譯 真理與方法—哲學詮釋學的基本特徵,第一卷,台北時報,一九九三年真理與方法—補充和索引,第二卷,台北時報,一九九五年
    Hans Kelsen著,沈宗靈譯 法與國家的一般理論,北京中國大百科全書出版社,1995
    Peter Winch著,張君玫譯 社會科學的理念,台北巨流,一九九六
    R. M. Hare 著,黃慧英、方子華譯 道德思維,台北遠流,一九九一年
    R. M. Hare 著,李日章譯 柏拉圖,台北聯經,民國七十九年
    L. M. Friedman著,吳錫堂、楊滿郁譯 法律與社會,台北巨流,民國八十年
    d’Entreves, A. P.,李日章譯 自然法,聯經,台北,民國七十九年
    Michael Stolleis 著,顏厥安譯 德國近代公法成立的原因及歷史背景—一個綜論,政大法學評論,第五十二期,民國八十三年十二月
    外文期刊論文
    Ago, Roberto Positive Law and International Law, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 51, 1957
    Ames, James Barr Law and Morals, Harvard Law Review, vol. 22,1908-1909, p.97-113
    Apel, Karl-Otto Wittgenstein and the Problem of Hermeneutic Understanding, Toward A Transformation of Philosophy, London, 1980, pp.1-45
    Austin, John The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and The Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence, New York, 1965
    Austin, J. L. The Meaning of a Word, in his Philosophical Papers, Oxford, 1979, pp. 23-43
    Bayles, Michael Hart vs. Dworkin, Law and Philosophy, 10, 1991, p.349-381
    Beyleveld, Deryck &Brownsword, Roger The Practical Difference Between Natural Law Theory and Legal Positivism, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol.5, No.1, pp.1-32
    Bodenheimer, Edgar Hart, Dworkin, and the Problem of Judicial Lawmaking Discretion, Georgia Law Review, vol.11, 1977, pp.1143-72
    Brink, David O The Hart-Fuller Debate, Rechttheorie, 14,1983Legal Positivism and Natural Law Reconsidered, The Monist, 1985, pp.364-387
    Cosgrove, Richard A. Scholars of the Law, NYU Press, 1996, pp.21-49.
    Edgeworth, Brendan Legal Positivism and the Philosophy of Language: A Critique of H.L.A. Hart’s ‘Descriptive Sociology’, Legal Studies, vol.6, No.2, 1986, pp.115-139.
    Endicott, Timothy A.O. Herbert Hart and the Semantic Sting, Legal Theory, vol.4, 1998, pp.283-300
    Finnis, John On Reason and Authority in Law’s Empire, Law and Philosophy, vol.6, No.3, 1987, pp.357-380
    Fuller, Lon L. Positivism and Fidelity to Law—A Reply to Professor Hart, Harvard Law Review, vol.71, No.4, 1958, pp.630-672
    Greenawalt, Kent Policy, Rights and Judicial Decision, Georgia Law Review, vol.11,1977, pp. 990-1053
    Habermas, Jurgen Law and Morality, in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, VIII, Univ. of Utah Press, 1988, pp.219-79
    Holmes, O. W. The Path of the Law, Harvard Law Review, vol.X, 1897, No.8, pp.457-78
    Henley, Kenneth Protestant Hermeneutics and the Rule of Law: Gadamer and Dworkin, Ratio Juris, vol.3, No. 1, 1990Abstract Principles, Mid-Level Principles, and the Rule of Law, Law and Philosophy, 12, 1993
    Jones, W. Harry Law and Morality in the Perspective of Legal Realism, Columbia Law Review, vol.61, 1961, pp.799-809
    Kaarlo Tuori, Helsink Legal Science as/and Social Science, ARSP, Beiheft Nr. 70, 1997, pp.127-48
    Llewellyn, Karl N. A Realistic Jurisprudence—The Next Step, Comlumbia Law Review, vol.XXX, No.4, 1930
    Lyons, David The Connection Between Law and Morality: Comments on Dworkin, Journal of Legal Education, Vol. 36, 1986, p.485Principles, Positivism, and Legal Theory, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 87, 1977
    Macedo, Stephen The Public Morality of the Rule of Law: A Critique of Ronald Dworkin, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, vol.8, no.1, 1985, pp.79-108
    Moore, Michael Hart’s Concluding Scientific Postscript, Legal Theory, vol.4, 1998, pp.301-327
    MacCormick, Neil Law as Institutional Fact, The Law Quarterly Review, vol.90, 1974
    Page, Carl Axiomatics, Hermeneutics, and Practical Rationality, International Philosophical Quarterly, vol.XXXVII, No.1, 1987
    Pappe, H. O. On the Validity of Judicial Decisions in the Nazi Era, The Modern Law Review, vol.23, 1960, pp.260-274
    Patterson, Dennis M. The Poverty of Interpretive Universalism: Toward the Reconstruction of Legal Theory, Texas Law Review, vol.72, 1993You Made Me Do It: My Reply to Stanley Fish, Texas Law Review, vol.72, 1993
    Paulson, Stanley L. Lon L. Fuller, Gustav Radbruch, and the “ Positivist” Theses, Law and Philosophy, vol.13, 1994, pp. 313-359.Radbruch on Unjust Laws: Competing Earlier and Later Views?, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 15, 1995
    Postema, Gerald J. Jurisprudence as Practical Philosophy, Legal Theory, vol.4, 1998, pp.320-357
    Rawls, John Two Concepts of Rules, Philosophical Review, vol.64, 1955, pp.3-32
    Raz, Joseph Legal Principles and the Limits of Law, the Yale Law Journal, vol.81, 1972, pp.823-54. Professor Dworkin’s Theory of Rights, Political Studies, vol. 26, No.1, 1978 Dworkin: A New Link in the Chain, California Law Review, vol.74, 1986, pp.1103-1119On the Nature of Law, ARSP, vol. 82, 1996, 1Quartal, Heft.1Two Views of the Nature of the Theory of Law: A Partial Comparison, Legal Theory, vol. 4, 1998, pp.249-282
    Ruben, Eira John Austin’s Political Pamphlets 1824-1859, in Perpectives in Jurisprudence, ed. by Elspeth Attwool, Univ. of Glasgow Press, 1977
    Sartorius, Rolf Hart’s Concept of Law, in Robert S. Summers ed.,More Essays in Legal Philosophy, Univ. of California Press, 1971, pp.131-161Social Policy and Judicial Legislation, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol.8, No.2, 1971, pp.151-60
    Schauer, Frederick Fuller’s Internal Point of View, Law and Philosophy, 13, 1994, p.285-312
    Schlesinger, Sybil Working Definitions: A Critique of H.L.A. Hart’s Use of Wittgenstein in The Concept of Law, ARSP, Vol. 83,1997
    Schutz, Alfred Common Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action, in The Problem of Social Reality—Collected Papers 1, Kluwer Publishing Company, the Netherlands, 1982, pp.3-47
    Schwartz, Richard L. Internal and External Method in the Study of Law, Law and Philosophy, 11, 1992, p.179-199
    Shiner, Roger A. Law and Morality, in A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, ed. by Dennis Patterson, 1996, pp.436-449
    Singer, Joseph William Legal Realism Now, California Law Review, vol.76, 1988
    Strauss, Leo On Natural Law, in his Studies in Platonic Philosophy, Univ. of Chicago Press, 1983
    Summers, Robert S. Notes on Criticism in Legal Philosophy, More Essays in Legal Philosophy, ed. by Robert S. Summers, Univ. of California Press, 1971, pp.1-17.Professor Fuller on Morality and Law, in More Essays in Legal Philosophy, ed. by Robert S. Summers, Univ. California Press, 1971Toward a Better General Theory of Legal Validity, Rechttheorie 16, 1985, s.65-83
    Tur, Richard Positivism, Principles and Rules, in Perpectives in Jurisprudence, ed. by Elspeth Attwool, Univ. of Glasgow Press, 1977
    Williams, Glanville The Controversy Concerning the Word ‘Law’, in Laslett ed., Philosophy, Politics and Society, Oxford, 1956
    外文書籍
    Alexy, Robert A Theory of Legal Argumentation, tr. by Ruth Adler and Neil MacCormick, Oxford, 1989
    Austin, John The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, New York, 1965
    Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words, Harvard Univ. Press, 1962
    Bayles, Michael Hart’s Legal Philosophy, London, 1992
    Benditt, Theodore M. Law as Rule and Principle—Problems of Legal Philosophy, The Harvester Press, 1978
    Beyleveld, Deryck &Brownsword, Roger Law as a Moral Judgement, London, 1986
    Bix, Brian Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy, Oxford, 1993
    Cohen, Marshall ed. Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence, New Jersey, 1983
    Cosgrove, Richard A. Scholars of the Law-English Jurisprudence from Blackstone to Hart, NYU Press, 1996
    Cotterell, Roger The Politics of Jurisprudence—A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy, London and Edinburgh, 1989
    Dallmayr, Fred R. Polis and Praxis, MIT Press, 1984
    Deflem, Mathieu Habermas, Modernity and Law, London, 1996
    Dias Jurisprudence, London, 1985, 5th ed.
    Finnis, John Natural Law and Natural Rights, Oxford, 1980
    Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law, Yale Univ. Press, 1969
    Finnis, John Natural Law and Natural Rights, Oxford, 1980
    Fletcher, George P. Basic Concepts of Legal Thought, Oxford, 1996
    Friedrich, Carl Joachim The Philosophy of Law in Historical Perspective, 2nd ed., The Univ. of Chicago Press, 1963
    Linge, David E. Editor’s Introduction, in Philosophical Hermeneutics, Univ. of California Press, 1977
    Gavison, Ruth ed. Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy-The Influence of H.L.A. Hart, Oxford, 1992
    George, Robert P. ed. Natural Law Theory-Contemporary Essays, Oxford, 1992
    Guest, Stephen Ronald Dworkin, Stanford Univ. Press, 1991
    Gunther, Klaus The Sense of Appropriateness—Application Discourses in Morality and Law, tr. by John Farrel, State Univ. of New York Press, 1993
    Habermas, Jurgen On the Logic of the Social Sciences, tr. by Shierry Weber Nicholsen and Jerry A. Stark, MIT Press, 1988Between Facts and Noms, tr. by William Rehg, MIT, 1996
    Hacker, P.M.S. &Raz, Joseph Law, Morality and Society—Essays in Honor of H.L.A. Hart , Oxford, 1977
    Hare, R. M. The Language of Morals, Oxford, 1964
    Hudson, W. D. Modern Moral Philosophy, London, 1983, 2nd ed.
    MacCormick, Neil H. L. A. Hart, London, 1981
    Patterson, Dennis M. ed. Wittgenstein and Legal Theory, Westview Press, 1992 A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory,1996
    Perelman, Chaim Justice, Law, and Argument—Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning, 1980
    Pound Roscoe Law and Morals, New York, 1969
    Raz, Joseph The Authority of Law-Essays on Law and Morality, Oxford, 1979
    Rommen, Heinrich A. The Natural Law—A Study in Legal and Social History and Philosophy, Liberty Fund Inc., Indianapolis, 1998
    Schauer, Frederick Playing by the Rules, Oxford, 1991
    Shiner Roger A. Norm and Nature, Oxford, 1992
    Watkin, Thomas Glyn The Nature of Law, New York, 1980
    Wittgenstein, Ludwig Philosophical Investigation, 1958
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法律學系
    85651021
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002000859
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML46View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback