English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46115517      Online Users : 687
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/92179


    Title: 從宗教自由檢討「宗教團體法草案」（上）
    Other Titles: The Evaluation of Bills Regulating the Religious Freedom of Religious Groups (1)
    Authors: 許育典;周敬凡
    Hsu, Yue-Dian;Chou, Jing-Fan
    Keywords: 自我決定;宗教自由;宗教團體;政教分離;宗教中立原則;宗教團體法草案
    self-determination;freedom of religion;religious communities;separation of church and state;religious neutrality;the free exercise of religion;bills regulating religious groups
    Date: 2006-02
    Issue Date: 2016-05-05 17:30:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文的目的，在於探究我國憲法第十三條所保障的宗教自由基本權的內涵。在我國的現今時空下，宗教自由確實有必要作為憲法基本權被保障？國家是否可以透過法律，直接規範人民的宗教生活領域？如果可以，該法律的界限應設在哪裡，才不至於違反憲法上保護宗教自由的要求？這些也是本文所欲處理的問題。其次，在前述的基礎上，探討在宗教自由保護下宗教團體的地位；並進而針對九十四年三月由行政院送交立法院審議的「宗教團體法草案」 ，作出相應的分析與檢討，亦即，在該草案中，哪些規定逾越了應有的界限，進而侵犯了人民或宗教團體的宗教自由；並且，對這些本文認為不妥之處，嘗試提出可能的改進意見。最後，本文會對整部草案提出歸納式的意見，包括草案的缺失及修正的方向。
    This article is aimed to clarify the meanings of the basic right of religious freedom, which is protected by Clause 13 of the Constitution. Is it actually necessary to protect religious freedom in Taiwan at the present time as a basic right? Can a country directly regulate the religious life of its people by means of legislation? If the answer is yes, then how can the country regulate it without violating the constitutional demand for protection of this basic right? These questions are addressed in this part of the discussion. Moreover, issues related to the protection of religious communities and a draft made by the Executive Yuan are also main points examined in this article.
    Relation: 法學評論, 89, 55-108
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    89(55-108).pdf711KbAdobe PDF2357View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback