政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/94362
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46303987      Online Users : 231
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > Journals of NCCU > Issues & Studies > Articles >  Item 140.119/94362


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94362


    Title: 中華民國嚇阻戰略之評析
    Other Titles: Theory and Practice of ROC`s Deterrence Strategy
    Authors: 陳勁甫;李樹幹
    Chen, Ching-Pu;Lee, Shu-Kan
    Keywords: 「有效嚇阻、防衛固守」;報復性嚇阻;拒止性嚇阻;嚇阻戰略
    Effective Deterrence and Resolute Defense;Punishment Deterrence;Denial Deterrence;Deterrence Strategy
    Date: 2004-12
    Issue Date: 2016-05-06 16:27:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 「有效嚇阻」是我國軍事戰略的基石之一。然而，國內對此概念的看法分歧，導致理論與實際有所落差，產生不利於嚇阻戰略的風險，也影響到後續的兵力規劃、武器獲得、資源分配與軍事準則運用。本文首先釐清嚇阻的意義、類型、構成要素與不定性，接著詮釋台灣嚇阻戰略理論與實際的不同思維，並從報復性與拒止性二個面向及溝通、能力、可信度三個因素，來探討台灣嚇阻戰略的現況、所面臨的兩難與衍生的相關問題。研析結果顯示：雖然在思維上台灣傾向報復性嚇阻，但實際作為上仍趨向拒止性嚇阻，而在溝通、能力與可信度方面則仍有待加強。最後也討論了美國在兩岸嚇阻戰略中所扮演的角色。
    ”Effective deterrence” is a corner stone in the Republic of China’s (ROC`s) military strategy. Divided opinions and incongruent strategic thinking among domestic experts have affected the effectiveness of deterrence strategy. It also affects the subsequent forces planning, weapon acquisition, resources allocation, and military doctrine. This study first examines the meaning, category, and elements of deterrence. It then investigates ROC`s different deterrence concepts with a focus on the existing gap between theory and reality. Finally, the authors discuss the current status and problems of ROC`s deterrence strategy from the viewpoints of punishment and denial and the three constructs of deterrence-communication, capability and credibility. This study shows that while ROC intends to develop a more punishment-oriented deterrence strategy, while in reality, it is closer to a denial one.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 43(5), 1-29
    Issues & studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Issues & Studies] Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    4351.pdf1582KbAdobe PDF2745View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback