English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109953/140903 (78%)
Visitors : 46054823      Online Users : 1023
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/94640
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94640


    Title: 網絡連結對企業國際化進程的影響:以鋼鐵產業為例
    The effects of network connections on firms’ internationalization process: A case study of Taiwan’s steel industry
    Authors: 陳柏宏
    Hung, Chen Po
    Contributors: 張逸民
    陳柏宏
    Chen Po Hung
    Keywords: 網絡連結
    國際化進程
    鋼鐵產業
    network connection
    internationalization process
    iron-and-steel industry
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 11:24:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 鋼鐵産業是象徵國家經濟情況的重要基礎産業,也是代表社會發展程度、經濟實力的重要標誌。因此鋼鐵產業常被認為是具有代表國力強弱的指標性意義,不論是先進國家或發展中國家,皆長期的、積極的振興鋼鐵產業。

    現今臺灣的鋼鐵業者在面對上、下游皆瘦而中游獨大的特殊產業環境之下,許多企業為了達到產業規模經濟與拓展銷售市場,紛紛前往海外另闢戰場。傳統的國際化理論認為國際化過程的演變是大型企業為了因應產品生命週期的演進而選擇在海外市場發揮其資源優勢的行為,然而從網絡連結觀點我們可以把國際化看成是企業試圖和國外網絡連結建立關係的作為。通常非大型企業並不具備獨自建立國外相關網絡的資源深度,然而透過網絡關係的合作卻可以快速取得當地市場知識並藉由現有通路進入國際市場。這對於具有高進入障礙、高度資本密集、高度技術密集且企業難以獨自擁有足夠生產資源等特性的鋼鐵產業而言,網絡關係連結相當重要。

    在這個全球化的時代,大多數企業遲早都會在國際上競爭。因此,專注於國內市場交易的在地企業會被迫具有國際競爭力並參與國際商業活動。所有管理國內企業或跨國集團的經理人都必須意識到這個潮流的影響力。全球化經濟現在已經充斥在世界的各個角落,而且國際化現在所影響的不僅是大型企業集團連許多的非大型企業也是。本次研究針對鋼鐵產業使用多點個案研究法,調查網絡連結對企業國際化進程的影響。來自六家鋼鐵業者的研究證據顯示可以印證在企業的國際化過程中,網絡連結會觸發並驅動企業的國際化、影響企業的海外市場選擇決策與進入模式決策、幫助企業獲得起始信用、接近新網絡關係與現成通路、也協助降低成本與風險,並且影響企業的國際化步調。
    The iron-and-steel industry is an important basic industry to symbolize national economics, and a main indicator which represents social development level and economics power. Because the iron-and-steel industry is usually considered as an index of national strength, no wander many developed and developing nations all have prospering iron-and-steel industries.

    Now iron-and-steel firms in Taiwan are facing a unique industrial environment, and many are expanding new overseas markets to exploit economies of scale. Traditional internationalization theory posited that the internationalization process is a behavior of giant enterprises to adapt to the product life cycle evolvement and exploit the resource advantage abroad. However, we can view internationalization as a behavior of SMEs to establish relationships with foreign networks from the network perspective. Usually small firms can’t afford enough resources to build up international networks by themselves, but by only cooperating through network connections they can obtain foreign market knowledge soon and penetrate international markets via existing channels. The iron-and-steel industry has high entry barriers, high capital requirement and technology intensity, for SMEs difficult to have all kinds of production resources, the network relationship connections are quite crucial to succeed in international markets.

    In this era of globalization, most firms will sooner or later have to compete in the international market. Therefore, local firms that focus their business on the domestic market are forced to be internationally competitive and to participate in international business. All managers must be aware of this trend when managing a domestic firm or a multinational conglomerate. The global economy now has reached every corner of the world, and internationalization now involves not just the giant corporations but also many SME enterprises. This research use case research method to examine the influence of network connections on the internationalization process of SME iron-and-steel firms in Taiwan. The evidence from the cases of six iron-and-steel firms shows that the firms’ internationalization process was triggered and motivated by network connections which also affected their foreign market-selection decisions and mode-of-entry decisions, helped them obtain initial credibility and access to other relationships and established channels, helped in lowering cost and risk, and influenced their internationalization pace.
    Reference: 一、中文部份

    1. 于卓民(2005)。國際企業-環境與管理(2版)。台北市:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
    2. 方至民(2006)。國際企業管理-建構全球營運優勢。台北縣:前程文化事業股份有限公司。
    3. 司徒達賢(2005)。策略管理新論:觀念架構與分析方法(2版)。台北市:智勝文化事業有限公司。
    4. 任慶宗(2003)。集團企業子公司之綜效利益與彈性限制-網絡觀點。國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
    5. 吳寶秀(1990)。臺灣製造業員工個人社會網絡分析。東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
    6. 李蘭甫(1990)。國際企業論(3版)。臺北市:三民書局。
    7. 林正暐(2006)。台灣鋼鐵產業升級發展策略之研究。國立成功大學資源工程研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
    8. 林濟民(1999)。國際化資源網絡聯結對廠商競爭優勢之影響研究。國立暨南國際大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
    9. 施淑惠(2001)。人際網絡對電腦態度之影響:以台北市政府基層公務員為例。元智大學資訊社會學硏究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
    10. 洪世章、陳忠賢(2000)。台灣企業集團的發展是漸趨同形嗎?台大管理論叢,11(1),p.73~101。
    11. 徐中琦(1996)。多國籍企業的新挑戰-國際營運與組織能力。經濟情勢暨評論季刊,第2卷第2期。
    12. 翁存義(2006)。臺灣鋼鐵業大陸投資的關鍵成功因素。國立中山大學管理學院高階經營碩士學程在職專班碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    13. 張苙雲(主編)(1999)。網絡台灣-企業的人情關係與經濟理性。臺北市:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
    14. 張苙雲、譚康榮(1999)。形構產業網絡。載於張苙雲(主編),網絡台灣-企業的人情關係與經濟理性(17~64頁)。臺北市:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
    15. 陳金在(2003)。企業轉型與國際化之實證研究-以台灣鋼鐵產業為例。國立成功大學企業管理研究所高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
    16. 陳俊彰(2001)。從網頁中發掘教師知識分佈圖。國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    17. 黃延真(2001)。產業網絡與企業對外投資--以鋼鐵產業為例。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    18. 楊逸民(2000)。資訊化組織員工人際關係網絡對工作滿足與組織承諾的影響-與科層式組織之比較。元智大學資訊社會學硏究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
    19. 經濟部中小企業處(2004)。中小企業白皮書(GPN:1009302527)。台北市:作者。
    20. 謝之駿(2007)。煉鐵煉鋼的真功夫-百鍊成鋼。科學發展,417,p.44~48.
    21. 謝明瑞(2001)。台灣鋼鐵業的發展(編號:財金(研)090-072號)。臺北市:財團法人國家政策研究基金會。
    22. 蕭新煌、王宏仁、龔宜君(主編)(2002)。台商在東南亞:網絡、認同與全球化。台北市:中央研究院亞太研究計畫。


    二、英文部份

    1. Andersen, O. (1993). On the internationalization process of firms: A critical analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(2), p.209~231.
    2. Axelsson, B., & Johanson, J. (1992). Foreign market entry-the textbook vs. the network view. In B. Axelsson & G. Easton (Eds.), Industrial networks: a new view of reality (p.218~234). London: Routledge.
    3. Bartlett, C. A., Ghoshal, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2003). Transnational management-text, cases, and readings in cross-border management. (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
    4. Bell, J. (1995). The internationalization of small computer software firms-a further challenge to "stage" theories. European Journal of Marketing, 29(8), p.60~75.
    5. Bilkey, W. J., & Tesar, G. (1977). The export behavior of smaller-sized Wisconsin manufacturing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), p.93~98.
    6. Björkman, I., and Kock, S. (1995). Social relationships and business networks: the case of western companies in China. International Business Review, 4(4), p.519~535.
    7. Bucklin, L. P., & Sengupta, S. (1993). Organizing successful co-marketing alliances. Journal of Marketing, 57(2), p.32~46.
    8. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge: Blackwell.
    9. Chen, H. & Chen, T. J. (1998). Network linkages and location choice in foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), p.445~467.
    10. Chen, T. J., Chen, H., & Ku, Y. H. (2004). Foreign direct investment and local linkages. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(4), p.320~333.
    11. Chetty, S., & Patterson, A. (2002). Developing internationalization capability through industry groups: the experience of a telecommunications joint action group. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 10(1), p.69~89.
    12. Coviello, N. E., & Munro, H. J. (1995). Growing the entrepreneurial firm: networking for international market development. European Journal of Marketing, 29(7), p.49~61.
    13. Coviello, N., & Munro, H. (1997). Network relationships and the internationalisation process of small software firms. International Business Review, 6(4), p.361~386.
    14. Deresky, H. (2000). International management: managing across borders and cultures. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    15. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), p.532~550.
    16. Ellis, P. (2000). Social ties and foreign market entry. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), p.443~470.
    17. Ellis, P., & Pecotish, A. (2001). Social factors influencing export initiation in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), p.119~130.
    18. Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. The American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), p.1411~1454.
    19. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), p.603~625.
    20. Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), p.431~445.
    21. Griffin, R. W., & Pustay, M. W. (2005). International business. (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    22. Jarillo, J. C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), p.31~41.
    23. Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L.-G. (1987). Interorganizational relations in industrial systems: a network approach compared with the transaction-cost approach. International Studies of Management and Organization, 17(1), p.34~48.
    24. Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L.-G. (1988). Internationalisation in industrial systems-a network approach. In N. Hood & J.-E. Vahlne (Eds.), Strategies in global competition (p.287~314). New York: Croom Helm.
    25. Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), p.23~32.
    26. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1990). The mechanism of internationalisation. International Marketing Review, 7(4), p.11~24.
    27. Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm-four Swedish cases. Journal of Management studies, 12(3), p.305~322.
    28. Johnson, M. P., & Milardo, R. M. (1984). Network interference in pair relationships: a social psychological recasting of Slater`s theory of social regression. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46(4), p.893~899.
    29. Jones, M. V. (1999). The internationalization of small high-technology firms. Journal of International Marketing, 7(4), p.15~41.
    30. Katsikeas, C. S., & Morgan, R. E. (1994). Differences in perceptions of exporting problems based on firm size and export market experience. European Journal of Marketing, 28(5), p.17~35.
    31. Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), p.565~586.
    32. Mitja, R., Robert, D. H., & Bostjan, A. (2006). SME internationalization research: past, present, and future. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(4), p.476~497.
    33. Mønsted, M. (1993). Regional network processes: networks for the service sector or development of entrepreneurs? In C. Karlsson & B. Johannisson & D. Storey (Eds.), Small business dynamics-International, national and regional perspectives (p.204~223). London: Routledge.
    34. Oviatt, B. M. & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), p.45~64.
    35. Penrose, E. T., & Slater, M. (1980). The theory of the growth of the firm. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    36. Reid, S. D. (1981). The decision-maker and export entry and expansion. Journal of International Business Studies, 12(2), p.101~112.
    37. Sharma, D. D., & Johanson, J. (1987). Technical consultancy in internationalisation. International Marketing Review, 4(4), p.20~29.
    38. Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), p.37~51.
    39. Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), p.190~207.
    40. Whetten, D. A., (1981). Interorganizational relations: a review of the field. The Journal of Higher Education, 52(1), p.1~28.
    41. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.


    三、網路部份

    1. 中國報告大廳市場研究報告網 http://www.chinabgao.com/
    2. 行政院主計處 http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1
    3. 經濟合作暨發展組織鋼鐵委員會 www.oecd.org/sti/steel
    4. 臺灣區鋼鐵工業同業公會 http://www.tsiia.org.tw/index.aspx
    5. 鋼鐵數位博物館 http://museum.csc.com.tw/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理學系
    94355071
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094355071
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback