政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/94698
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109951/140892 (78%)
造访人次 : 46221197      在线人数 : 682
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/94698


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94698


    题名: 母公司智慧資本移轉對子公司經營績效之影響：以大陸台商為例
    The Impacts of Transfer Intellectual Capital from Parent on Performance of Subsidiary: An Examination of Taiwanese Enterprises in China
    作者: 郭翠菱
    Kuo, Tsuilin
    贡献者: 吳安妮
    Wu,Anne
    郭翠菱
    Kuo,Tsuilin
    关键词: 智慧資本
    移轉機制
    吸收能耐
    經營績效
    台商
    Intellectual capital
    Transfer mechanism
    Absorptive capacity
    Subsidiary performance
    Taiwanese Enterprises
    日期: 2008
    上传时间: 2016-05-09 11:29:13 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 隨著中國大陸近十餘年來的改革開放，以低廉的勞工與土地成本、及高度持續之經濟成長，吸引台商紛紛將過去的台灣經驗移植到大陸。本研究從大陸子公司角度探討影響其經營績效之因素，分析台商母公司的智慧資本對大陸子公司經營績效的影響，特別將母子公司間的移轉機制與子公司的吸收能耐納入實證分析中。
    本研究採用田野研究、問卷調查、與實證資料檢定，並結合多種不同的資料庫來源，以在大陸設有子公司進行投資活動之我國公司為研究對象進行問卷調查，回收之有效樣本合計共103家。路徑分析之結果發現大部分台商母公司所擁有的智慧資本會直接影響大陸子公司的經營績效。在智慧資本的移轉成效上，台商人力資本有移轉和吸收效果，但創新資本的效果則不佳。在上市櫃電子業之樣本下，母公司所擁有的人力資本係先透過影響母子公司間的移轉機制，再間接影響大陸子公司的資產報酬率。當台商母公司所擁有的人力資本愈高時，有助於提高大陸子公司之吸收能耐，並間接影響大陸子公司的資產報酬率。另外，迴歸分析之結果發現，不同智慧資本組成要素對大陸子公司經營績效影響的程度並不相同，人力資本對經營績效有顯著的正效果，而創新資本對經營績效的影響並不顯著。本研究最後建議理論或實務上之管理意涵。
    Over the past decade, the regulations of China have changed, and it provided a huge resource of cheap labor and land. Following the rapid economic growth has attracted Taiwanese enterprises to transfer their success experiences to China. It is important to examine the determinants of performance of subsidiary in China. This study analyzes the relationship between intellectual capital and performance covering the transfer from Taiwanese parent to Chinese subsidiary. This study particularly highlights the role of transfer mechanism and absorptive capacity in explaining the effect of intellectual capital on performance.
    This study integrates multiple research methodologies including field study, questionnaire, and empirical study. Since no single database exists to support this study, multiple sources are employed for constructing the sample frame. Based on a sample of 103 subsidiaries of Taiwanese enterprises in China, results of path analysis indicate that intellectual capital from parent is positively associated with the performance of subsidiary. In general, the results support that the effects of human capital on performance are mediated by both transfer mechanism and absorptive capacity, but the transfer roles of innovation capital are not supported. Finding from the public electronic industry reveals that the influence of human capital on return of assets is indirect through the mediating role of transfer mechanism. An absorptive capacity path is presented where absorptive capacity is associated with return of assets, and human capital influences absorptive capacity. Moreover, regression analyses demonstrate that different intellectual capital elements have a different effect on organizational performance. Human capital is important in explaining the variations in the performance of subsidiary, while innovation capital has little or no effect. Implications for theory and research are discussed.
    參考文獻: 一、中文文獻：
    1. 大前研一，2003，力用中國，張新琦譯，臺北: 天下雜誌。
    2. 工商時報，2005.9.16，福特集團兩岸人才大調動（四版）。
    3. 王文英與張清福，2004，智慧資本影響績效模式之探討：我國半導體業之實證研究，會計評論，第39期：89-117。
    4. 巫和懋，2008，「中國大陸能否維持高速成長？」，天下雜誌，第392期: 166-179。
    5. 吳安妮與劉俊儒，2001，員工面、內部營運面、及顧客面對財務績效影響之實證研究，台灣管理學刊，第一卷，第1期：125-150。
    6. 吳昭怡，2007，「一千大ＣＥＯ調查：七成ＣＥＯ認為台灣競爭力退步」，天下雜誌，第371期: 84-91。
    7. 吳昭怡，2008，「烈日下，台商要抬頭看路」，天下雜誌，第389期: 156-159。
    8. 吳昭怡與熊毅晰，2008，「烈日照台商：2008台商關鍵年！」，天下雜誌，第388期: 100-135。
    9. 吳琬瑜，2007，「突圍二部曲，兩岸三地一千大上市公司：華商天下」，天下雜誌，第372期: 90-218。
    10. 吳琬瑜，2008，「火熱中國內需，兩岸三地一千大」，天下雜誌，第397期: 166-283。
    11. 李信宏，2007，大陸台商1000大：中概股大揭密，商訓文化，工商時報委託中華徵信所調查、寶來證券（香港）協助。
    12. 李信宏，2006，大陸台商1000大：解讀台商成功密碼，商訓文化，工商時報委託中華徵信所調查、寶來證券（香港）協助。
    13. 周文賢，2002，多變量統計分析－SAS/STAT使用方法，台北：智勝文化。
    14. 馬岳琳，2008，「潤太集團，尹衍樑：『亞元』經濟體將成型」，天下雜誌，第396期: 102-104。
    15. 高長與楊景閔，2004，製造業台商全球佈局對台灣產業發展之意涵，二零零四年經濟全球化與台商大陸投資研討會論文集，台北市兩岸經貿交流協會。
    16. 陳添枝與顧瑩華，2004，全球化下台商對大陸投資策略，二零零四年經濟全球化與台商大陸投資研討會論文集，台北市兩岸經貿交流協會。
    17. 梁寶華，2005，大陸台商一千大，工商財經數位，工商時報委託中華徵信所調查、寶來證券（香港）協助。
    18. 張清福、王文英與李佳玲，2007，資訊科技投資與企業績效之因果關係模型探討：以台灣資訊電子業為實證對象，會計評論，第44期：1-26。
    19. 彭杏珠，2008，「兩岸工作潮 系列報導(上) ，追逐『薪』中國：你不是念錯系，也不是沒工作，是工作地點改變「，遠見雜誌，第261期：100-139。
    20. 楊朝旭與蔡柳卿，2006，人力資源管理系統、創新與企業經濟附加價值關聯性之研究，管理評論，第二十五卷，第3期：41-68。
    21. 經研室，2007，「二零零六兩岸三地一千大上市櫃排行進入世界級競爭：決戰贏者圈」，商業周刊，第1018期：106-200。
    22. 經濟日報，2008.6.10，台積高階製程登陸，創意當先鋒（A6版）。
    23. 經濟日報，2008.6.11， 品牌全球化，台商新視界—劉金標：創新，為品牌加分；施振榮：做品牌，企圖要大，步伐要慢，以「國際在地化發展」（A5版）。
    24. 經濟日報，2008.6.17，大前研一：亞半球崛起--台灣的機會與挑戰 (A14版)。
    25. 經濟日報，2008.6.18，大前研一：台灣應變身超級矽谷 (A12版)。
    26. 經濟日報，2008.7.18，登陸上限60% 鴻海亞泥YA!：對大陸投資逼近40%、有收益回饋母公司的中概股受惠最大 (A2版)。
    27. 經濟日報，2008. 7.18，企業總部在台 籌資登陸不設限：旺旺冠傑 可望回台設總部 (A2版)。
    28. 經濟部投資業務處，2008，天涯行腳 台商新視界，台北：經濟部投資業務處編著。
    29. 經濟部投資審議委員會，2007，中華民國華僑及外國人投資、對外投資、對外投術合作、對大陸間接投資、大陸產業技術引進統計速報。投審會網址：http://www.moeaic.gov.tw。
    30. 經濟部投資審議委員會，2006，2006年赴中國大陸投資事業營運狀況調查分析報告（調查年度：2005年）。經濟部投資審議委員會委託中華經濟研究院編撰。
    31. 經濟部投資審議委員會，2005，中國大陸投資事業營運狀況調查分析報告（調查年度：2004年）。經濟部投資審議委員會委託中華經濟研究院編撰。
    32. 經濟部投資審議委員會，2004，大陸投資事業營運狀況調查分析報告（調查年度：2003年）。經濟部投資審議委員會委託中華經濟研究院編撰。
    33. 經濟部投資審議委員會，中華民國華僑及外國人投資、對外投資、對大陸間接投資統月報，各期。
    34. 劉正田，2001，研發支出資本化之會計基礎股票評價，會計評論，第33期：1-26。
    35. 劉正田、林修葳與金成隆，2005，企業研發投資、專利權與經營績效之關係：路徑分析，管理評論，第二十四卷，第4期： 29-56。
    36. 樊鋼、王小魯與朱恆鵬，2007，中國市場化指數：各地區市場化將對進程2006年報告，北京：經濟科學出版社。
    37. 聯合新聞網，2008，科技百強 台灣18家上榜，聯合新聞網網址：http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/080524/2/zvov.html。

    二、英文文獻：
    1. Aboody, D., and B. Lev. 2000. Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains. The Journal of Finance 55(6): 2747-2766.
    2. Aboody, D., and B. Lev. 2001. R&D productivity in the chemical industry. Working paper, University of California-Los Angeles.
    3. Acedo, F. J., C. Barroso, and J. L. Galan. 2006. The resource-based theory: Dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal 27: 621-636.
    4. Amir, E., and B. Lev. 1996. Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: the wireless communications industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22 (August): 3-30.
    5. Amit, R., and P. J. H. Schoemaker. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal 14(1): 33-46.
    6. Anand, V., C. M. Charles, and H. G. William. 1998 An organizational memory approach to information management. Academy of Management Review October: 796-809.
    7. Baker, W. 1990. Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology 96(3): 589-625.
    8. Badaraccio, J. L. 1991. The Knowledge Link, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    9. Barney, J. B. 1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science 32: 1231-1241.
    10. Barney, J. B. 2001. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review 26(1): 41-56.
    11. Barr, A. 2000. Social capital and technical information flows in the Ghanaian manufacturing sector. Oxford Economic Papers 52(3):539-559.
    12. Bassi, L. J., and M. E. Van Buren. 1999. Valuing investment in intellectual capital.　International Journal of Technology Management 18: 414-432.
    13. Belsley, A., E. Kuh, and R. Welsch. 1980. Regression Diagnostics, New York: Wiley.
    14. Becker, G. S. 1964. Human capital, New York: Columbia University Press.
    15. Bharadwaj A. S. 2000. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly 24 (1): 169-196.
    16. Blyler, M., and R. W. Coff. 2003. Dynamic capabilities, social, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal 24(7): 677-686.
    17. Bontis, N. 1998. Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision 36(2): 63-72.
    18. Bontis, N. 1999. Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field. International Journal of Technology Management 18(5/6/7/8): 433-462.
    19. Bontis, N., W. C. Keow, and S. Richardson. 2000. Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1(1): 85-100.
    20. Bontis, N. and J. Fitz-enz. 2002. Intellectual capital ROI: a casual map of human capital antecedents and consequents. Journal of Intellectual Capital 3(3): 223-247.
    21. Brennan, N., and B. Connell. 2000. Intellectual capital: current issues and policy implications. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association, Munich: 29-31.
    22. Brooking, A., P. Board, and S. Jones. 1998. The predictive potential of intellectual capital. International Journal of Technology Management 16(1/2/3): 115-125.
    23. Brown, J. S. and P. Duguid. 1998. Organizing knowledge. California Management Review 40(3): 90-111.
    24. Bukh, P. N. 2003. Commentary the relevance of intellectual capital disclosure: a paradox? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 16: 49-56.
    25. Burt, R. S. 1992. The social structure of competition. N. Nohria, and R. G. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action: 57-91, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    26. Carmeli, A., and A. Tishler. 2004. Resources, capabilities, and the performance of industrial firms: A multivariate analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics 25 (6): 299-315.
    27. Carmeli, A. 2007. Social capital, psychological safety and learning behaviors from failure in organizations. Long Range Planning 40: 30-44.
    28. Carpenter, M. A., W. G. Sanders, and H. B. Gregersen. 2001. Bundling human capital with organizational context: the impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal 44(3): 493-511.
    29. Chang, C. P. 2006. Establishing a performance predication model for insurance companies. Journal of American Academy of Business 8 (1): 73-77.
    30. Chauvin, K. W., and M. Hirschey. 1993. Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm. Financial Management 22 (Winter): 128-140.
    31. Chen, M. C., S. J. Cheng, and Y. Hwang. 2005. An empirical investigation of intellectual capital, market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6(2): 159-176.
    32. Christie, A., M. Joye, and R. Watts. 2003. Decentralization of the firm: Theory and evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance: 3-36.
    33. Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4: 386-405.
    34. Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128-153.
    35. Cohen, D., and L. Prusak. 2001. In Good company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    36. Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    37. Collins, H. 1993. The structure of knowledge. Social Research 60: 95-116.
    38. Collins, C. J., and K. D. Clark. 2003. Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: the role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal 46(6): 740-751.
    39. Conner, K. R., and C. K. Prahalad. 1996. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science 7: 477-501.
    40. Cook, K. S. 1982. Social Structure and Network Analysis, edited by Marsden P. V. and Lin N., London: Sage Publication.
    41. Cowan, D., and H. Foray. 1999. The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. DRUID summer conference paper.
    42. Davenport, T. H., and L. Prusak. 1998. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    43. Deeds, D. L. 2001. The role of R&D intensity, technical development and absorptive capacity in creating entrepreneurial wealth in high technology start-ups. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 18(1): 29-47.
    44. Delery, J. E., and J. D. Shaw. 2001. The strategic management of people in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and extension. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 20: 165-197.
    45. Devaraj, S., and R. Kohli. 2003. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Science 49 (March): 273-289.
    46. Dzinkowski, R. 2000. The measurement and management of intellectual capital: an introduction. International Management Accounting Study (February): 32-36.
    47. Edvinsson, L., and P. Sullivan. 1996. Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. European Management Journal 14(4): 356-364.
    48. Edvinsson, L. and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual Capital Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower, New York: Harper Business.
    49. Eisenhardt, K. M., and J. A. Martin. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21(10-11): 1105-1121.
    50. Finkelstein, S., and D. Hambrick. 1996. Strategic Leadership, St. Paul: West.
    51. Flamholtz, E., and J. Lacey. 1981. Personnel Management: Human Capital Theory and Human Resource Accounting, Los Angeles: Institute of Industrial Relations, UCLA.
    52. Grant, R. M. 1991. A resource based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33(3): 114-135.
    53. Grant, R. M., and Baden-Fuller. 1995. A knowledge-based theory of interfirm collaboration. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceeding: 17-21.
    54. Grant, R. M. 1996a. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue, 17: 109-122.
    55. Grant, R. M. 1996b. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7: 375-387.
    56. Gu, F. and B. Lev. 2001. Intangible assets, measurement, drivers, and usefulness. Working paper, Boston University and New York University.
    57. Guillen, M. F. 2000. Business groups in emerging economies: a resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 362-380.
    58. Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal 20(5): 397-420.
    59. Gulati, R., N. Nohria, and A. Zaheer. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal 21: 203-215.
    60. Habib, M. A., and A. Ljungqvist. 2005. Firm Value and Managerial Incentives: a Stochastic Frontier Approach. The Journal of Business 78 (6): 2053-2093.
    61. Hair, J., R. Anderson, R. Tatham, and W. Black. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th Ed. Prendice-Hall Inc.
    62. Hakansson, H. 1989. Corporate Technological Behavior: Cooperation and Networks, London: Routledge.
    63. Hall, B. H. 1993. The stock market’s valuation of R&D investment during the 1980’s. The American Economic Review 83 (May): 259-264.
    64. Hamel, G., Y. Doz, and C. K. Prahalad. 1989. Collaborate with your competitors, and win. Harvard Business Review 57: 133-139.
    65. Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for competence in inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal 12: 83-102.
    66. Helleloid, D., and B. Simonin. 1994. Organizational learning and a firm’s core competence. G. Hemel and A. Heene (eds.), Competence-Based Competition: 111-144, N. Y.: John Wiley & Sons Press.
    67. Hendricks, K. B., and V. R. Singhal. 2005. Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance. Management Science 51 (5): 695-711.
    68. Hidding, G. and S. M. Catterall. 1998. Anatomy of a learning organization: Turning knowledge into capital at Anderson consulting. Knowledge and Process Management 5(1): 3-13.
    69. Hill, C. W. L., and S. A. Snell. 1988. External control, corporate strategy and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal 9(6): 577-590.
    70. Hirschey, M., V. Richardson, and S. Scholz. 2001. Value relevance of nonfinancial information: the case of patent data. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 17: 223-235.
    71. Hitt, M. A., L. Bierman, K. Shimizu, and R. Kochhar 2001. Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: a resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal 44(1): 13-28.
    72. Howell, J. 1996. Tacit knowledge, innovation and technology transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 8: 91-106.
    73. Huang, C. J., and C. J. Liu. 2005. Exploration for the relationship between innovation, IT and performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6 (2): 237-252.
    74. Huselid, M. A. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 38: 635-672.
    75. Hussi, T., and G. Ahonen. 2002. Managing intangible assets: a question of integration and delicate balance. Journal of Intellectual Capital 3: 288-286.
    76. Inkpen, A. C. 1996. Creating knowledge through collaboration. California Management Review 39: 123-140.
    77. Ittner, C. D., D. F. Larcker, and M. V. Rajan. 1997. The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. The Accounting Review 72 (2): 231-255.
    78. Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1992. Specific and general knowledge, and organizational structure. In: Werin, L., and H. Wijkander (Eds.), Contract Economics. Blackwell, Oxford: 251-274.
    79. Johanson, U., M. Mårtensson, and M. Skoog. 2001. Mobilizing change through the management control of intangibles. Accounting, Organizations and Society 26 (7-8): 715-733.
    80. Johnson, R. A., and D. W. Wichern. 1992. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall Inc.
    81. Kang, J. K., and A. Shivdasani. 1995. Firm performance, corporate governance, and top executive turnover in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics 38: 29-58.
    82. Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1992. The balanced-scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review (1): 71-79.
    83. Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 2000. The Strategy-Focused Organization, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    84. Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 2004. Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    85. Kogut, B., and U. Zander. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capacities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3: 383–397.
    86. Kogut, B., and U. Zander. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24(4): 625-645.
    87. Lane, P. J., J. E. Salk, and M. A. Lyles. 2001. Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal 22(12): 1139-1161.
    88. Leana, C. R., and H. J. III Van Buren. 1999. Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review 24: 538-555.
    89. Lee, K., and A. V. Witteloostuijn. 1998. Human capital, social capital, and firm dissolution. Academy of Management Journal 41(4): 425-440.
    90. Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    91. Lepak, D. P., and S. A. Snell. 1999. The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review 24(1): 31-28.
    92. Lev, B. 2001. Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting, Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
    93. Lev, B. 1999. R&D and capital markets. Bank of American Journal of Applied Corporate Finance: 21-35.
    94. Lev, B., and P. Zarowin. 1998. The market value of R&D expenditures. Working paper, New York University.
    95. Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis. 1996. The capitalization, and amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21(1): 107-138.
    96. Levinthal, D. A., and J. G. March. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal Winter Special Issue 14: 95-112.
    97. Linsu, K. 1998. Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science 19(4): 506-521.
    98. Liu, J., L. H. Huang, and H. W. Lin. 2004. A study of relationships among R&D investments, patent grants and operating performance: the effects of Taiwan patent legislation. Taiwan Accounting Review 4(2): 97-126.
    99. Luo, Y. 1997. Partner selection and venturing success: the case of joint ventures with firms in the People’s Republic of China. Organization Science 8(6): 648-662.
    100. Lynn, B. 1998a. Performance evaluation in the new economy: Bringing the measurement and evaluation of intellectual capital into the management planning and control system. International Journal of Technology Management 16(1/2/3): 162-176.
    101. Lynn, B. 1998b. The Management of Intellectual Capital: The Issues and the Practice, Hamilton: The Society of Management Accountants of Canada.
    102. Lynskey, M. J. 1996. The transfer of resources and competences for developing technological capabilities: the case of Fujitsu-ICL. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 11(3): 317-336.
    103. Mahmood, M. A., G. J. Mann, M. Dubrow, and J. Skidmore. 1998. Information technology investment and organizational performance: a lagged data analysis. Proceeding of the Information Resources Management Association: 19-22.
    104. Makadok, R. 2001. Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal 22(5): 387-401.
    105. March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2: 71-87.
    106. Masoulas, V. 1998. Organizational requirements definition for intellectual capital　management. International Journal of Technology Management 16: 126-43.
    107. Mavridis, D. G. 2004. The intellectual capital performance of the Japanese banking sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5(1): 92-115.
    108. Mavridis, D. G., and P. Kyrmizoglou. 2005. Intellectual capital performance drivers in the Greek banking sector. Management Research News 28 (5): 43-62.
    109. Miller, D., and J. Shamsie. 1996. The resource-based review of the firm in two environments: the Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal 39(3): 519-543.
    110. Miller, K., M. Zhao, R. Calantone. 2006. Adding interpersonal learning and tacit knowledge to March’s exploration-exploitation model. Academy of Management Journal 49(4): 709-722.
    111. Minbaeva, D., T. Pedersen, I. Bjorkman, C. F. Fey, and H. J. Park. 2003. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies 34(6): 586-599.
    112. Mishra, C. S., and D. H. Gobeli. 1998. Managerial incentives, internalization and market valuation of multinational firms. Journal of International Business Studies 29: 583-98.
    113. Morck, R. and B. Yeung. 1991. Why investors value multinationality. Journal of Business 64: 165-87.
    114. Morck, R. 1996. On the economics of concentrated ownership. Candian Business Law Journal 26: 63-75.
    115. Mouritsen, J, H. T. Larsen, P. N. Bukh, and M. R. Johansen. 2001. Reading and intellectual capital statement: Describing and prescribing knowledge management strategies. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2: 359-383.
    116. Mowery, D. C., J. E. Oxley, and B. S. Silverman. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 77-91.
    117. Nadler, D. A., and E. E. Lawler.1995. Motivation: a diagnostic approach. B. Staw (eds.), Psychological dimensions of organizational behavior: 27-37, Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
    118. Nahapiet, J., and S. Ghoshal. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23: 242-266.
    119. Nelson, R. R., and S. G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    120. Nonaka I. 1991. The knowledge creating company. Harvard business Review 69: 96-104.
    121. Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company, New York: Oxford University Press.
    122. Nunnally, J. C. 1997. Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    123. Orlikowski, W. 2002. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science 13(3): 249-273.
    124. Patel, P., and K. Pavitt. 1995. Patterns of technological activity: their measurement and interpretation, in: P. Stoneman (Eds), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Basil Blackwell, Oxford: 14-51.
    125. Pennings, J. M., K. Lee, and A. Van Witteloostuijn. 1998. Human capital, social capital and firm dissolution. Academy of Management Journal 41: 425-440.
    126. Penrose E. 1959. The Theory of Growth of the Firm, New York: Wiley.
    127. Pfeffer, J. 1994. Competitive Advantage through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force, Boston: Harvard Business Scholl Press.
    128. Pfeffer, J. 1997. New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects, New York: Oxford University Press.
    129. Pisano, G. P. 1990. The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 153-176.
    130. Prahalad, C. K. and G. Hamel. 1990. The core competence of corporation. Harvard Business Review, May-June.
    131. Quinn, J. B. 1992. Intelligent Enterprise, New York: Free Press.
    132. Riahi-Belkaoui, A. 2003. Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms: a study of the resource-based and stakeholder views. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(2): 215-226.
    133. Ritter, T. 1999. The networking company: Antecedents for coping with relationships and networks effectively. Industrial Marketing Management 28: 467-479.
    134. Reagans, R., and E. W. Zuckerman. 2001. Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science 12: 502-517.
    135. Rogers, M., and Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research. 2002. Firm performance and investment in R&D and intellectual property. Working paper, Harris Manchester College, Oxford.
    136. Roos, G., S. Pike, and L. Fernström. 2005. Managing Intellectual Capital in Practice, USA : Butterworth-Heinemann, an imprint of Elsevier Ltd.
    137. Roos, J., G. Roos, L. Edvinsson, and N. C. Dragonetti. 1998. Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape, New York: New York University Press.
    138. Saenz, J. 2005. Human capital indicators, business performance and market-to-book ratio. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6 (3): 374-384.
    139. Sandberg, J. 2000. Understanding human competence at work: an interpretative approach. Academy of Management Journal 43: 9-25.
    140. Schroeder, R. G., K. A. Bates, and M. A. Junttila. 2002. A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance. Strategic Management Journal 23(2): 105-117.
    141. Schultz, T. W. 1961. Investments in human capital. American Economic Review 51(March): 1-17.
    142. Schumpeter, J. A. 2000. Entrepreneurship as innovation. In Richard Swedberg, Edition. Entrepreneurship: The Socilal Science View, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 51-75.
    143. Shalley, C. E., and L. L. Gilson. 2004. What leaders need to know: a review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly 15: 33-53.
    144. Sharma, B. 2004. Marketing strategy, contextual factors and performance: an investigation of their relationship. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 22 (2): 128.
    145. Shiu, H. J. 2006. The application of the value added intellectual coefficient to measure corporate performance: Evidence from technological firms. International Journal of Management 23 (2): 356-365.
    146. Siegel, J. I., and J. J. Chang. 2006. Samsung Electronics. Harvard Business School.
    147. Sougiannis, T. 1994. The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. The Accounting Review 69(1): 44-68.
    148. Stalk, G., P. Evans, and L. E. Shulman. 1992. Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review 70(2): 57-69.
    149. Stone, D. N., J. E. Hunton, and B. Wier. 2000. Succeeding in managerial accounting. Part 1: Knowledge, ability, and rank. Accounting, Organizations and Society 25: 697-715.
    150. Stewart, T. A. 1994. Your company’s most valuable asset: Intellectual capital. Fortune 130(7): 68-74.
    151. Stewart, T. A. 1997. Intellectual Capital：The New Wealth of Organizations, New York : Doubleday.
    152. Stuart, T. H. 1998. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 43(3): 668-698.
    153. Sullivan, P. J. 2000. Value-Driven Intellectual Capital: How to Convert Intangible Corporate Assets into Market Value. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
    154. Sullivan, P. J. and P. S. Sullivan. 2000. Valuing intangible companies: an intellectual capital approach. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1(4): 328-340.
    155. Sveiby, K. E. 1997. Intellectual capital: Thinking ahead. Austalian CPA 68(5): 18-22.
    156. Teece, D. J. 1988. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy Dec: 285-305.
    157. Teece, D. J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509-533.
    158. Teece, D. J. 1998. Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review 40: 55-79.
    159. Tripsas, M. 1997. Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from typesetter industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 6(2): 341-377.
    160. Tucker, M.L., G.. D. Meyer, and J. W. Westerman. 1996. Organizational communication: Development of internal strategic competitive advantage. The Journal of Business Communication 33(1): 51-69.
    161. Tsai, W., and S. Ghoshal. 1998. Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal 41(4): 464-476.
    162. Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational network: Effects of network position and absorptive capability on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal 44(5): 996-1004.
    163. Ulrich, D. 1998. Intellectual capital = competence × commitment. Sloan Management Review (Winter): 15-26.
    164. Wagner, R. K.1987. Tacit knowledge in everyday intelligent behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(5): 1236-1247.
    165. Wang, W. Y., and C. Chang. 2005. Intellectual capital and performance in casual models: Evidence from the information technology industry in Taiwan. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6(2): 222-236.
    166. Wernerfelt B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171-180.
    167. Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies, Analysis and antitrust implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization, New York: Free Press.
    168. Williamson, O. E. 1981. The economies of organization: the transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology 87: 548-577.
    169. Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: Free Press.
    170. Yin, J. Z. 1992. Technological capabilities as determinants of the success of technology transfer process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 42 (1): 17-29.
    171. Young, C. S. 2005. Top management teams’ social capital in Taiwan: the impact on firm value in an emerging economy. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6(2): 177-190.
    172. Zahra, S., and G. George. 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27(2): 185-203.
    173. Zhou, X. and P. L. Swan. 2003. Performance thresholds in managerial incentive contracts. The Journal of Business 76(4): 665-696.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    91353505
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913535051
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈