Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95006
|
| Title: | 客語潛能補語構式之事件概念與論元體現：認知模型與構式理論之整合
Event conception and argument realizations of Hakka potential complement constructions: Integration of cognitive-constructional models |
| Authors: | 強舒媺
Chiang, Shu Mei |
| Contributors: | 賴惠玲
Lai, Huei Ling
強舒媺
Chiang, Shu Mei |
| Keywords: | 客語
潛能補語
事件概念
論元體現
構式語法
認知語法
Hakka
potential complement
event conception
argument realization
Construction Grammar
Cognitive Grammar |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-05-09 14:40:46 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本論文主要採用Jackendoff (2002)之平行結構(parallel architecture)來展現客語潛能補語各次構式在音韻、句法以及語意結構的共性與殊性，並據此呈現此構式於抽象性連續體(continuum of schematicity)上由「完全能產性」(fully productive)、「半能產性」(semi-productive)至「完全獨特性」(fully idiomatic)各區段之分佈狀態，進一步歸納出此構式家族之構式基模(constructional schema)以及繼承階層體系(inheritance hierarchy)。在構式語法精神下，每個構式皆是「形式-功能」之組合，Jackendoff (2002)之平行結構極為精細且縝密地描繪構式之「形式」面向。而為了檢視論元角色如何體現於客語潛能補語構式，認知語法中對事件概念之處理方式是不容忽視的，因此，為了補強平行結構在呈現構式「認知功能」面向之不足，本論文將Langacker (1991)認知模型中「行為鏈」(action chain)、「撞球模型」(billiard ball model)、「舞台模型」(stage model)等認知概念整合至平行結構中，用以顯示說話者對事件之概念化如何影響客語潛能構式之論元體現，進一步檢視此構式形式與功能之象徵性關係在連續體上之展現。藉由構式理論與認知模型之整合，本研究為語言形式與功能之對應提供一縝密之分析模式，並得以反思構式語法之應用性與發展性。
Adhering to the constructional view claiming that every construction is a form-function pairing, this dissertation provides a detailed analysis of the correspondence between linguistic manifestations and speaker`s construal of events. The main focus of this study is on the interactions between argument realizations and event conception in Hakka potential complement constructions. In order to show more vividly the subtle interfacing relationships among phonological, syntactic and semantic structures, this study adopts Jackendoff`s (2002) parallel architecture to present clearly the degree of schematicity of Hakka PC constructions. On the other hand, further integrating the cognitive representations such as action chains and stage model from Langacker`s (1991) Cognitive Grammar into the parallel architecture crystallizes the symbolic relations between the constructional form and function. Members of Hakka PC constructions are shown to be distributed on a continuum of schematicity, from fully productive cases, to semi-productive cases, and finally to fully substantive cases. Moreover, all subconstructions form a family, organized in an inheritance hierarchy in which the one at the lower level inherits general qualities from its inheritor, and at the same time possess its own uniqueness. Integrating the cognitive and the constructional models, this dissertation proposes a fine-grained and full-fledged analysis of both the regularities and the idiosyncrasies of Hakka PC constructions. |
| Reference: | Anderson, J. M. 1971. The Grammar of Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, M. C. 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bencini, G. M. L., and Adele E. Goldberg. 2000. The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43. 640-51.
Bhatt, Rajesh. 1999. Covert Modality in Non-Finite Contexts. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2006. Covert Modality in Non-Finite Contexts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Binnick, R. 1991. Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxofrd: Oxford University Press.
Boas, Hans C. 2003. A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Boas, Hans C. 2005. Determining the productivity of resultative constructions: A reply to Goldberg & Jackendoff. Language 81:2. 448-64.
Boas, Hans C. 2008a. Determining the structure of lexical entries and grammatical constructions in Construction Grammar. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6. 113-44.
Boas, Hans C. 2008b. Resolving form-meaning discrepancies in Construction grammar. Constructional Reorganization, ed. by J. Leino, 11-36. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bolinger, D. 1965. The atomization of meaning. Language 41. 555-73.
Borer, H. 2003a. Exo-skeletal vs. Endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory, ed. by J. Moore and M. Polinsky, 31-67. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Borer, H. 2003b. The grammar machine. The Unaccusativity Puzzle, ed. by A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou, and M. Everaert, 288-331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borer, H. 2005a. Structuring Sense 1: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borer, H. 2005b. Structuring Sense 2: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Broccias, Cristiano. 2000. The need for the resultative network. Proceedings of the twenty-sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Soceity, ed. by Lisa J. Conathan, Jeff Good, Darya Kavitskaya, Alyssa B. Wulf, and Alan C. L. Yu, 41-52. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan L. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10. 425-55.
Bybee, Joan L. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ed. by Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda, 602-23. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind`s response to repetition. Language 82:4. 711-33.
Bybee, Joan L., and P. Hopper. (eds.) 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan L., and Suzanne Fleischman. 1995. Modality in grammar and discourse: An introductory essay. Modality in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by J. L. Bybee and S. Fleischman, 1-14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 413-56.
Carrier, Jill, and Janet Randall. 1992. The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 173-233.
Carter, R. J. 1988. Some linking regularities. On Linking: Papers by Richard Carter, Lexicon Project Working Paers 25, ed. by B. Levin and C. Tenny, 1-92. MIT: Center for Cognitive Science.
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. Subject and Topic, ed. by Charles Li, 27-55. New York: Academic Press.
Chang, Hung-hsing. 2001. The Syntax of Event Structure in Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii dissertation.
Chao, Yuan Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Chao, Yuan-ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: Universiy of California Press.
Chappell, Hilary. (ed.) 2001. Sinitic Grammar: Synchornic and Diachronic Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Rint Sybesma. 2003. Forked modality. Linguistics in The Netherlands, ed.by L. Cornips and P. Fikert, 13-23. Amdsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Rint Sybesma. 2004. Posverbal `can` in Cantonese (and Hakka) and agree. Lingua 114. 419-45.
Cheng, Robert L. 1992. Taiwanhua he Putonghua de dongxiang—shitai xitong (台灣話和普通話的動相-時態系統) [Phase and aspect system in Taiwanese and mandarin]. Chinese Languages and Linguistics I: Chinese Dialects. 179-239. Taipei: The Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.
Cheng, Robert L. 1997. Taiyu he Huayu de shiduan—shitai xitong. Taiyu Huayu de Jiegou ji Dongxiang III: Taihuayu de Shikong, Yiwen he Fouding (台語和華語時段-時態系統.) [Taiwanese and Mandarin Structures and Their Developmental Trends in Taiwan III: Temporal and Spatial Relations, Questions and Negatives in Taiwanese and Mandarin]. 73-161. Taipei: Yuan-Liou Publiching Co., Ltd.
Chiang, Min-hua. 2007. A preliminary survey of verb complement constructions in Dongshi Hakka. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 35:2. 225-66.
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cooreman, A., B. Fox, and T. Givón. 1984. The discourse definition of ergativity. Studies in Language 8. 1-34.
Cornish, Francis. 2007. Implicit internal arguments, event structure, predication and anaphoric reference. The Grammar-Pragmatics Interface: Essays in Honor o Jeanette K. Gundel, 189-216. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Croft, William, and Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, William. 1986. Categories and relations in Syntax: The Clause-Level Organization of Information. Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford: Stanford University.
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Croft, William. 1994. The semantics of subjecthood, Subjecthood and Subjectivity: The Status of the Subject in Linguistic Theory, ed. by M. Yaguello, 29-75. Paris: Ophrys.
Croft, William. 1998. The structure of events and the structure of language. The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, ed. by Michael Tomassello, 67-92. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, William. 2004. Logical and typological arguments for Radical Construction Grammar. Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried, 273-314. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
de Haan, Ferdinand. 1997. The Interaction of Modality and Negation: A Typological Study. New York & London: Garland Publishing, Inc.
de Hann, Ferdinand. 2006. Typological approaches to modality. Expression of Modality, ed. by William Frawley, 27-69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila. 2002. On two types of result: Resultatives revisited. Ms. NTNU, Trondheim.
Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Donahue, M. (MS). The Ingredients of grammatical Functions: Sorting Subjects and Pivots in Tudang Besi. Unpublished ms. National University of Singapore.
Dowty, D. R. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67. 547-619.
Du Bois, J. W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63. 805-55.
Erteschik-Shir, N., and T. R. Rapoport. 1996. Focusing on lexical nuclei. IATL 3: The Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference and of the Workshop on Discourse, 87-103.
Erteschik-Shir, N., and T. R. Rapoport. 2004. Bare aspect: A theory of syntactic projection. The Syntax of Time, ed. by J. Guéron and J. Lecarme, 217-34. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1965. Indirect Object Constructions in English and the Ordering of Transformations. The Hague: Mouton.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1975. Against checklist theories of meaning. Proceedings of the First Anuual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by C. Cogen, 123-31. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. Topics in lexical semantics. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, ed. by P. Cole, 76-138. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1989. Grammatical Construction Theory and the familiar dichotomies. Language Processing in Social Context, ed. by R. Dietrich and C. F. Graumann, 17-38. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1999. Inversion and constructional inheritance. Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation, ed. by G. Webelhuth, J.-P. Koenig, and A. Kathol, 113-28. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Fillmore, Charles J. 2002. Mini-grammars of some time-when expressions in English. Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by J. L. Bybee and M. Noonan, 31-59. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Fillmore, Charles J. Paul Kay and Mary Kay O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64. 501-38.
Fillmore, Charles J., and Paul Kay. 1987. The goals of Construction Grammar. Berkeley Cognitive Science Report No.50. University of California at Berkeley.
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, Laura Michaelis, and Ivan Sag. To appear. Construction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Fodor, J., and E. Lepore. 1999. The emptiness of the lexicon: Critical reflections on J. Pustejovsky`s The Generative Lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 445-53.
Foley, W. A. 2007. Typology of information packaging in the clause. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1: Clause, ed. by T. Shopen, 362-446. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fried, Mirjam, and Jan-Ola Östman. 2004. Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective, ed. by Mirjam Fried and Jan-Ola Östman, 11-86. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ghomeshi, J., and D. Massam. 1995. Lexical/syntactic relations without projection. Linguistic Analysis 24. 175-217.
Gil, D. 1994. The structure of Riau Indonesian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17. 179-200.
Giorgi, Alessandra, and Fabio Pianesi. 2004. On the speaker’s and the subject’s temporal representation: The case of the Italian imperfect. The Syntax of Time, ed. by J. Gueron and J. Lecarme, 259-98. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gleitman, L. 1994. The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition: Core Readings, ed. by P. Bloom, 174-221. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1997. The relationships between verbs and constructions. Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning, ed. by M. Verspoor, K. D. Lee, and E. Sweetser, 383-98. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1998. Patterns of experience in patterns of language. The New Psychology of Language, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 203-19. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2000. Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted: The role of information structure in argument distribution. Language Science 23. 503-24.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 7:5. 219-24.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E., and Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80:3. 532-68.
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by P. Cole and J. L. Morgan, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
Grimshaw, J., and S. Vikner. 1993. Obligatory adjuncts and the structure of events. Knowledge and Language II: Lexical and Conceptual Structure, ed. by E. Reuland and W. Abraham, 143-55. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gruber, J. S. 1965. Studies in lexical relations, Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge: MIT, MA. (Reprinted in Gruber 1976: 1-210)
Gruber, J. S. 1976. Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hacquard, Valentine. 2005. Aspects of ‘too’ and ‘enough’ constructions. Paper presented at SALT 15, UCLA.
Hacquard, Valentine. 2006. Aspects of Modality. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT.
Haiman, John. 1985. Iconicity in Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
He, Xiaoling. 2005. On Patient-Subject Construction in Chinese. Ph. D. dissertation. The University of Hong Kong.
Heime, Irene. 2000. Degree operators and scope. Proceedings of SALT 10, ed. by B. Jackson and T. Matthews. CLC Publications, Cornell University.
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. New York and London: Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ed. by Brian D. Joseph, and Richard D. Janda, 575-601. MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Her, One-soon. 2004. Argument-function linking in resultatives. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 30:2. 1-34.
Horn, L. R. 1984. Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q- and R- based implicatures. Meaning, Form, and Use in Context, ed. by D. Schiffrin, 11-42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Hsin, Aili. 1999. Modality in Taiwan Southern Min. Ph. D. dissertation, National Tsinghua University.
Hsueh, Frank F-S. 1989. The structure meaning of Ba and Bei constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Functionalism and Chinese Grammar, ed. by J. Tai and F. Hsueh, 95-125. Chinese language Teachers Association Monograph Series No.1. South Orange: Chinese Language Teachers Association.
Huang, C-T. James. 1988. Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language 64. 274-311.
Huang, James C.-T. 1984. Phrase structure, lexical integrity, and Chinese compounds. Journal of the Chinese Teachers Association 19:2. 53-78.
Ippolito, Michela. 2004. Imperfect modality. The Syntax of Time, ed. by J. Gueron and J. Lecarme, 359-87. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Iwata, Seizi. 2005a. Locative alternation and two levels of verb meaning. Cognitive Linguistics 16. 355-407.
Iwata, Seizi. 2005b. The role of verb meaning in locative alternations. Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots, ed. by Mirjam Fried and Hans C. Boas, 101-18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1976. Toward and explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 7. 89-150.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1996. The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14. 305-54.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. Twistin’ the night away. Language 73. 534-59.
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 2007. A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research 1146. 2-22.
Jackendoff, Ray. 2008. Construction after construction and its theoretical challenges. Language 84:1. 8-28.
Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Implicative verbs. Language 47. 340-58.
Kaufmann, I., and D. Wunderlich. 1998. Cross-linguistic Patterns of Resultatives. Unpublished ms. Düsseldorf: Heinrich Heine Universität.
Kay, Paul, and Charled J. Fillmore. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What`s X doing Y? construction. Language 75:1. 1-33.
Kay, Paul. 2002a. English subjectless tagged sentences. Language 78:3. 453-581.
Kay, Paul. 2002b. An informal sketch of a formal architecture for construction grammar. Grammars 5. 1-19.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. The Generic Book, ed. by Carlson, Gregory N., and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, 125-223. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Krifka, Manfred, et al. 1995. Genericity: An introduction. The Generic Book, ed. by G. N. Carlson, and F. J. Pelletier, 1-124. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ladusaw, A. William. 1979. Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. Doctoral Dissertation,
Lai, Huei-ling. 2003. Hakka LAU constructions: A constructional approach. Language AND Linguistics 4:2. 353-78.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lamarre, Christine. 2001a. Cong Putonghua li gen "de" youguan de ji ge geshi qu tantao fangyan leixingxue (從普通話裡跟"得"有關的幾個格式去探討方言類型學) [Exploring the dialectal typology from constructions relating to "de" in Mandarin Chinese]. Yuyan Yanjiu (語言研究) 2. 7-18.
Lamarre, Christine. 2001b. Verb complement constructions in Chinese dialects: Types and markers. Sinitic Grammar: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective, ed. by Hilary Chappell, 85-120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lamb, Sydney. M. 2002. Learning syntax―a neurocognitive approach. Applied Cognitive Linguistics I: Theory and Language Acquisition, ed. by Suzanne Niemeier, Martin Putz, and Rene Dirven, 167-91. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lambrecht, Knud. 2004. On the interaction of information structure and formal structure in constructions: The case of French right-detached comme-N. Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective, ed. by Mirjam Fried, and Jan Ola Östman, 157-99. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Jan Benjamins.
Lambreht, Knud, and Kevin Lemoine. 2005. Definite null objects in (spoken) French: A Construction-Grammar account. Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots, ed. by Mirjam Fried and Hans C. Boas, 13-55. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2005. Construction Grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so. Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction, ed. by Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibánez and M. Sandra Pena Cervel, 101-59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald. W. 1988. An overview of cognitive grammar. Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. By B. Rudzka-Ostyn, 127-61. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Langacker, Ronald. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive Applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald. W. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald. W. 2002. A dynamic usage-based model. Usage-based Models of Language, ed. by S. Kemmer and M. Barlow, 1-63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Leino, Jaakko. 2005. Frames, profiles and constructions: Two collaborating CGs meet the Finnish permissive construction. Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, ed. by Jan-Ola Ostman and Mirjam Fried, 89-120. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lekakou, Marika. 2002. Middle semantics and its realization in English and Greek. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14. 399-416.
Lemmens, M. 1998. Lexical Perspectives on Transitivity and Ergativity: Causative Constructions in English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lenci, Alessandro, and Pier Marco Bertinetto. 2000. Aspect, adverbs, and events: Habituality vs. perfectivity. Speaking of Events, ed. by James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi, and Achille C. Varzi, 245-87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levelt, W. 1989. Speaking. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity in the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2004. The semantic determinants of argument expression: A view from the English resultative construction. The Syntax of Time, ed. by Jacqueline Guéron and Jacqueline Lecarme, 477-94. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovev. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Li, Yafei. 1995. The thematic hierarchy and causativity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theories 13. 255-82.
Lidz, J., H. Gleitman, and L. Gleitman. 2003. Understanding how input matters: Verb learning and the foorprint of universal grammar. Cognition 87. 151-78.
Lien, Chinfa. 2001. The semantic extension of tioh8 著 in Taiwanese Southern Min: An interactive approach. Language and Linguistics 2:2. 173-202.
Lien, Chinfa. 2004. Polyfunctionality of pang3 放 in Taiwanese Southern Min: An exploration of the relationship between meaning and frorm. BIBLID 22:1. 391-418.
Lien, Chinfa. 2005. Phase and aspect markers in Li Jing Ji. Essays in Chinese Historical Linguistics. 293-420.
Lien, Chinfa. 2006. BONG2罔 in Taiwanese Southern Min: A lexical and constructional perspective. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 34:2. 328-54.
Lo, Hsiang-lin. 1933. Kejia Yanjiu Daolun (客家研究導論) [Introduction to Hakka Studies]. Xingning: Xi Shan Shu Cang.
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics, Vol.2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manning, C. D. 1996. Ergativity. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
McElvenny, James. 2006. The diachronic evolution of directional constructions in Mandarin. University of Sydney Honours Thesis.
Meier, Cécile. 2003. The meaning of ‘too’, ‘enough’ and ‘so…that’. Natural Language Semantics 11. 69-107.
Michaelis, Laura A. 2004.Type shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15. 1-67.
Michaelis, Laura A., and Josef Ruppenhofer. 2001b. Valence creation and the German applicative: The inherent semantics of linking patterns. Journal of Semantics 18: 335-395.
Michaelis, Laura A., and Josef. Ruppenhofer. 2001a. Beyond Alternations: A Constructional Model of the German Applicative. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Michaelis, Laura A., and Knud Lambrecht. 1996. Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language 72. 215-47.
Morris, W. C., and G. W. Cottrell. 1999. The empirical acquisition of grammatical relations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Meeting.
Müller, Stefan. 2006. Phrasal or lexical constructions? Language 82:4. 850-83.
Naigles, L., H. Gleitman, and L. Gleitman. 1993. Children acquire word meaning components from syntactic evidence. Language and Cognition: A Developmental Perspective, Vol.5, ed. by E. Dromi, 104-40. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nuyts, Jan. 2005. Brothers in arms? On the relations between cognitive and functional linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction, ed. by Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and M. Sandra Peña Cervel, 69-100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nuyts, Jan. 2006. Modality: Overview and linguistic issues. Expression of Modality, ed. by William Frawley, 1-26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ohta, T. 1958. Zhongguoyu Lishi Wenfa (中國語歷史文法) [Historical Grammar of the Chinese Language]. Chinese translation 1987 by S.Y. Jiang and C.H. Xu. Beijing: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe.
Östman, Jan-Ola, and Mirjam Fired. 2004. The cognitive grounding of Construction Grammar. Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried, 1-13. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Palmer, F. 1990. Modality and the English Modals. New York: Longman.
Palmer, F. 2001. Mood and Modality, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pianesi, Fabio, and Achille C. Varzi. 2000. Events and event talk: An introduction. Speaking of Events, ed. by James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi, and Achille C. Varzi, 3-47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pinker, Steven, and Ray Jackendoff. 2005. The faculty of language: What`s special about it? Cognition 95:2. 201-36.
Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Prince, E. F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. Radical Pragmatics, ed. by P. Cole, 223-54. New York: Academic Press.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin. 1998. Building verb meanings. The Projection of Arguments, ed. by M. Butt and W. Geuder, 97-134.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin. 2001. An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77:4. 766-97.
Rosch, E., and C. B. mervis. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7. 573-605.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José, and Ricardo Mairal Usón. 2006. Levels of semantic representation: Where lexicon and grammar meet. Interlingüística 17. 26-47.
Sagart, Laurent. 1988. On Gan-Hakka. Tsinghua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series. 18. 141-60.
Schachter, P. 1977. Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 8, ed. by P. Cole and J. Sadock, 279-306. New York: Academic Press.
Shen, jia-xuan. 2005. Ye tan nengxing shubu jiegou “V de C” han “V bu C” de bu duicheng (也談能性述補結構 “V得C” 和 “V不C”的不對稱) [Discussions of the asymmetry of potential complement constructions "V de C" and "V bu C"]. Yufahua yu Yufa Yanjiu (語法化與語法研究（二）)[Grammaticalizations and Grammatical research 2], ed. by Jiaxuan Shen, Fuxiang Wu, and Beijia Ma, 185-207. Beijing: Shangwu Publishing.
Siegel, L. 2000. Semantic bootstrapping and ergativity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago.
Silverstein, M. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. Grammatical Categories in Australian languages, ed. by R. Dixon, 112-71. New York: Humanities Press.
Smith, C. S. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Stowell, Tim. 2004. Tense and modals. The Syntax of Time, ed. by J. Gueron and J. Lecarme, 621-35. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word-order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Sun, Chaofen. 2006. Chinese: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suzuki, Toru. 2003. Constraining resultatives: A significant transition on a unique scale. Exploration in English Linguistics 18.
Tai, James H-Y. 1973. on the center of predication in Chinese verb-complement construction. Paper presented at 1973 Annual Meeting of Linguistics Society of America.
Tai, James H-Y. 2003. Cognitive relativism: Resultative construction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 4:2. 301-16.
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Force dynamics in language and thought. Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity, ed. by William H. Eilfort, Paul D. Kroeber, and Karen L. Peterson, 293-337. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Soceity.
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. Force dynamics in language and thought. Cognitive Science 12. 49-100.
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol.1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Taylor, J. R. 2004. Why construction grammar is radical. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 2. 321-48.
Tenny, C. 1987. Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge: MIT.
Tenny, C. 1992. The aspectual interface hypothesis. Lexical Matters, ed. by I. A. Sag, and A. Szabolcsi, 1-27. Stanford: Stanford University.
Tenny, C. 1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Tenny, C. 1995a. Modularity in thematic versus aspectual licensing. Paths and moved objects in motion verbs. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 40:2. 201-34.
Tenny, C. 1995b. How motion verbs are special: The interaction of semantic and pragmatic information in aspectual verb meanings. Pragmatics and Cognition 3. 31-73.
Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan. 2001. On subject specificity and theory of syntax-semantic interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10. 129-68.
Tsao, Fengfu. 1998. Taiwan Minnanyu zhong yu shimao youguan de yuci u o he a shixi [On three—Related morphemes u o a in Taiwan Minnan]. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 28. 299-334.
Van der Auwera, Johan and Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2. 79-124.
van Hout, A. 1996. Event Semantics of Verb Frame Alternations: A Case Study of Dutch and its Acquisition. Tilburg: Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 56. 143060. Reprinted in Z. Vendler (1967: 97-121).
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2001. Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 1505-28.
Voorst, J. van. 1993. A localist model for event semantics. Journal of Semantics 10. 65-111.
Wechsler, Stephen. 2005. Weighing in on scales: A reply to Goldberg and Jackendoff. Language 81:2. 465-73.
Wei, Pei-chuan. 2004. Object position in verb-complement potential constructions in early Mandarin. Language and Linguistics 5:3. 663-704.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wright, Saundra, and Beth Levin. 2000. Unspecified object contexts with activity and change of state verbs. Paper presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Chicago, IL.
Wu, Ching-Huei Teresa. 2004. On de/bu and the syntactic nature of resultative verbal compounding. Language and Linguistics 5:1. 271-329.
Wu, Fuxiang. 2002. Some remarks on the potential verb-complement construction in Chinese. Language Teaching and Research 5. 19-27. (吳福祥，2002，〈能性述補結構瑣議〉，《語言教學與研究》，第5期，19-27頁。)
Wu, Fuxiang. 2003. Types of word order of the potential verb-complement construction "V + de (得) + C/V + bu (不) + C" with object in the Southern Chinese Dialect. Fangyan (方言) [Dialect] 3. 243-54.
Xiang, Meng-bing. 1997. Grammatical Studies of Liancheng Hakka. Beijing: Yuwen Publishing.
Yang, P. 1989. "Dongci + de + binyu" jiegou de chansheng he fazhan ("動詞 + 得 + 賓語"結構的產生和發展) [Origin and development of the "verb + de + object" construction]. Zhongguo Yuwen 1989:2. 126-36.
Yip, Po-ching, and Rimmington Don. 1998. Intermediate Chinese: A Grammar and Workbook. New York: Routledge.
Yip, Po-ching, and Rimmington Don. 2004. Chinese: A Comprehensive Grammar. New York: Routledge.
Yue, Anne O. 2001. The verb complement construction in historical perspective with special reference to Cantonese. Sinitic Grammar: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, ed. by Hilary Chappell, 232-65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zaenen, A., and H. Uszkoreit. 1996. Language analysis and understanding. Survey of the State of the Art in Human language Technology, ed. by J. Cole, R. A. Mariani, H. Uszkoreit, A. Zaenen, and V. Zue, ch.3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhuang, Chusheng, and Tingting Huang. 2008. Potential constructions in Hakka more than 100 years a go in the new territories. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 2:2. 149-72. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
93555501 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0935555011 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [語言學研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 428 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
