English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89327/119107 (75%)
Visitors : 23820428      Online Users : 189
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95068


    Title: 驗證Penrose效應理論:以台灣企業為例
    Authors: 盧信丞
    Contributors: 譚丹琪
    盧信丞
    Keywords: 企業成長
    台灣企業
    Penrose Effect
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 14:53:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 摘要
    在企業成長理論中,「Penrose Effect」的意義,是指企業內管理資源的限制,影響了企業在未來成長速度。本研究主要探討在台灣的市場內,企業是否會有Penrose Effect的現象發生。本研究所設定的時間範圍為2002~2007年,以三年為一個時間階段,分第一期與第二期,來探討台灣企業的在這兩段期間內成長率的變動。本研究為首例使用台灣企業樣本進行Penrose Effect實證的研究,並進一步檢驗其他可能因素影響Penrose Effect的程度。
    研究結果顯示,台灣企業的第一期成長率與第二期成長率呈現負相關,也就是說,當台灣企業在第一期成長快速時,第二期的成長率就會相對的降低,證明了Penrose Effect現象在台灣企業中是存在的。在探討其他影響因素方面,本研究也發現,當企業資產報酬率越高、企業年齡越高、企業規模越大的狀況下,越能夠減弱第一期成長率對第二期成長率的負相關程度,也就是說,當這些因素數據越大,越有可能幫助企業在未來維持成長率,減少管理資源限制的影響。Penrose Effect意味著,台灣企業應為未來管理資源的培育做適當的分配,為企業長期的發展奠定良好的資源基礎。
    Reference: 參考文獻
    中文部分

    1. 王春如、唐麗英,《SPSS 統計分析(14.0中文版)》,儒林圖書公司,民國九十七年。
    2. 台灣經濟新報(Taiwan Economic Journal),台灣資料庫,民國九十八年。
    3. 林永順,《高級管理學》第二版,全力顧問有限公司,民國九十五年。
    4. 洪子豪,《企業概論,經營理念與實務操作》初版,華泰文化,民國九十五年。
    5. 廖光將,「台灣集團企業多角化策略與績效關係之研究:投資組合理論之運用」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國八十五年。
    6. 蘇怡如,「台灣集團企業多角化程度之探討」,國立成功大學國際企業研究所未出版碩士論文,民國九十一年。

    英文部分
    1. Aiken, L.S. & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. London: Sage.
    2. Amit, R. & J. Livant(1988). Diversification Strategies, Business Cycle, and Economic Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp. 99-110.
    3. Athanassious N. & Nigh D. (2000). Internationalization, Tacit Knowledge and the Top Management Teams of MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), pp 471-487.
    4. Barney, J.B. (1986). Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck and Business Strategy. Management Science, 32, pp.1231-1241.
    5. Becker, G.S. (1964). Human Capital. National Bureau of Economic Research: New York.
    6. Castania, R.P. & Helfat, C.E. (1991). Managerial resources and rents. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp.155-171.
    7. Cyert, R.M. & March, J.G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood, Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    8. Echevarria D. P. (1997). Capital Investment and the Profitability of Fortune 500 Industries: 1971-1990. Studies in Economics and Finance, Fall, pp.3-35.
    9. Gander, J.P. (1991). Managerial intensity, firm size and growth. Managerial and Decision Economics, 12, pp.261-266.
    10. Hay, D.A. & Morris, D.J. (1991). Industrial Economics and Organization: Theory and Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
    11. Hitt, MA., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K. & Kochhar, R.(2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: a resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), pp13-28.
    12. Ingham, H. (1992). Organizational Structure and firm behavior: an intertemporal perspective. Journal of Economic Studies, 19(5), pp. 19-35.
    13. Kuemmerle, W. (1997). Building Effective R&D Capabilities Abroad. Harvard Business Review, 75(2), pp.61-70.
    14. Levitt, B. & March, J.G. (1988). Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, pp.319-340.
    15. Luo, Y. & Peng, N.W. (1999). Learning to compete in a transition economy: experience, environment, and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), pp. 269-296.
    16. Maurer, H. (1955). Great Enterprise: Growth and Behavior of the Big Corporation. New York: Macmillan.
    17. Nelson, R.R. & Winter, S.G., (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    18. Neter, J., Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J. & Wasserrman, W., (1999). Applied Linear Statistical Models. Forth Edition. McGraw-Hill: New York.
    19. Orser, B.J., Hogarth-Scott, S. & Riding, A.L.(2000). Performance, firm size, and management problem solving. Journal of Small Business Management, Oct, pp.42-58.
    20. Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press: New York.
    21. Peterson, P.P. (1983). Financial Decision and the Life-Cycle of Corporations. Florida State University: The Financial Management Association Meeting.
    22. Porter, M., Sala-Matin, X., Blanke, J., Geiger, T. & Mia, I. (2007). The Global Competitiveness Report 2007-2008. World Economic Forum.
    23. Rubin, P.H. (1973). The Expansion of Forms. Journal of Political Economy, 81, pp.936-949.
    24. Shane, S.A. (1996). Hybrid Organizational Arrangements and Their Implications for Firm Growth and Survival: A Study of New Franchisors. Academy of Management Journal, 39, pp.216-234.
    25. Shen, T. Y. (1965). Economies of Scale, Expansion Path, and Growth of Plants. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, pp.420-428.
    26. Shen, T.Y. (1970). Economies of Scale, Penrose-Effect, growth of plants and their size distribution. Journal of Political Economy, 78(4), pp702-716.
    27. Slater, M. (1980). The Managerial Limitation To The Growth Of Firms. The Economics Journal, 90, pp 520-528.
    28. Stinchcombe, AL. (1965). Social structures and organizations. In Handbook of Organizations. March JG(ed.). Rand McNally: Chicago, pp 142-193.
    29. Tan, D. (2003). The Limits to the growth of multinational firms in a foreign market. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, pp.569-582.
    30. Tan, D. & Mahoney, J.T. (2005). Examining the Penrose Effect in an International Business Context: The Dynamics of Japanese Firm Growth in U.S. Industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26, pp. 113-127.
    31. Tan, D. & Mahoney, J.T. (2007). The Dynamics of Japanese Firm Growth in U.S. Industries: The Penrose Effect. Management International Review, 47, pp. 259-279.
    32. Teece, D.J. (1980). Economies of Scope and the Scope of the Enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, pp. 223-247.
    33. Teece, D.J. (1982). Towards an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firms. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, pp. 39-63.
    34. Thompson, R.S. (1994). The Franchise Life Cycle and the Penrose Effect. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 24, pp.207-218.
    35. Zander, U. & Kogut, B.(1995). Knowledge and the Speed of Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test. Organization Science, 6, 1, pp 76-92.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    96351041
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096351041
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML88View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback