政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/95352
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109948/140897 (78%)
造访人次 : 46076652      在线人数 : 636
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95352


    题名: 國民中學教師角色定義幅度對組織公民行為影響之研究-質量混合方法之應用
    The influence of Junior High School teachers’ role definition on organizational citizenship behavior –The application of mixed method
    作者: 高雅曼
    贡献者: 吳政達
    張奕華
    高雅曼
    关键词: 組織公民行為
    角色定義幅度
    混合方法
    日期: 2009
    上传时间: 2016-05-09 15:45:30 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究之主要目的在於透過文獻的探討，瞭解角色定義幅度與組織公民行為的相關研究，並輔以質性訪談瞭解教師角色定義幅度之內涵，最後運用量化統計分析方法探查國民中學教師組織公民行為與角色定義幅度之間的關連性，以及角色定義幅度對組織公民行為的預測力。
    本研究以700位國中教師為研究對象，有效問卷554份，問卷回收後以描述統計分析、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關及結構方程模式等統計方法進行資料分析。根據研究之結果與分析，歸納主要結論如下：
    一、國民中學教師組織公民行為之表現屬於中等程度。
    二、國民中學教師角色定義幅度之界定屬於中等程度。
    三、性別、年齡與現任職務在組織公民行為上有顯著的差異。
    四、現任職務在角色定義幅度上有顯著的差異。
    五、國民中學教師角色定義幅度與組織公民行為有高度正相關。
    六、國民中學教師角色定義幅度可以預測組織公民行為。
    最後，根據研究結果，研究者提出若干建議以提供教育相關人員以及未來研究之參考。
    The object of this study is to explore the influence of junior high school teachers’ Role Definition on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB). First of all, through literature review to understand related research of Role Definition and OCB. And then, explore connotation of teacher’s Role Definition by qualitative interviews. In the end, use quantitative analysis to explore relationship between Role Definition and OCB of junior high school’s teacher, and prediction of Role Definition to OCB.

    This study conducts a questionnaire survey on 700 junior high school’s teachers; the usable surveys were 554. The collected data were analyzed by using the descriptive statistic, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson Product-moment Correlation, structural equation modeling and other statistical methods.

    According to the finding, the conclusions of this study are:
    1. The OCB performance of junior high school teachers was moderate.
    2. The Role Definition of junior high school teachers was moderate.
    3. The gender, age and current position in the OCB have significant differences.
    4. Role Definition of current position has significant differences.
    5. School teachers’ Role Definition and OCB are highly positive correlation.
    6. School teachers’ Role Definition can predict OCB

    Finally, according to the result, the researchers bring up some suggestions as references for educational personnel and further studies.
    參考文獻: 壹、中文部分
    王文中、陳雪珠（1999）。新進國中教師主要工作內容之分析。教育與心理研究，22(1)，87-122。
    台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫(2004)。教師的工作內容與時間調查。2009年1月16日，取自http://www.teps.sinica.edu.tw/TEPSNews/TEPS~News_014.pdf
    朱經明（2005）。教育及心理統計學。臺北市：五南。
    吳明清（1996）。臺灣地區國民小學教師服務狀況之調查研究。臺北市：國立教育資料館。
    李碧娟（2002）。國中教師教學自主之研究－以一位東部國中教師為例。國立東華大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮縣。
    沈坤鴻(2005)。國民小學教師工作內容分析。國立中正大學心理學所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
    周怡君（2006）。國小校長家長式領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺南市。
    周祝瑛、陳威任（1996）。國中日常教學活動之生態硏究。臺北市：行政院教育改革審議委員會。
    林佳潓（2004）。知覺組織支持與組織公民行為:角色定義幅度之中介效果。中原大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
    林詩涵（2005）。角色界定與組織公民行為之關連性探討。國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版，花蓮縣。
    邱麗蓉、單小琳（2005）。國民小學組織公平與組織公民行為關係之研究。康寧學報，7，1-44。
    胡雅棠（2008）。教師覺知校長服務領導與教師組織公民行為的關係研究-以台南市國民中學為例。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所學校經營與管理教學碩士班碩士論文，未出版，臺南市。
    徐玉真（2008）。幼稚園教師組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究---兼論隱涵領導理論對信任的影響。國立政治大學幼兒教育所碩士碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
    張瑛儒（2009）。學校教師組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究以嘉義縣國民中學為例。國立嘉義大學教育行政與政策發展研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義是。
    許道然（2002）。公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
    許籐繼、羅綸新（2006）。國民中小學教師擔任校外交通導護工作之研究。師大學報，51(2)，237-256。
    陳新文（2004）。教師對行政工作的角色定義與兼任意願關係之研究---以桃園地區國中教師為樣本。元智大學管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
    陳源豐（2000）。繁重的國小教師工作。2009年1月16日，取自http://forum.frontier.org.tw/hef/viewtopic.php?topic=6079&forum=1
    劉之穎（1998）。教師生涯起步走。臺北市：幼獅文化。
    蔡孟眞（2002）。角色定義幅度與組織公民行為：前置要素之探討。中原大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
    蔡孟眞（2002）。角色定義幅度與組織公民行為：前置要素之探討。中原大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
    盧婉君（2004）。組織公民行為的角色定義對其與互動公正間關係之影響探討--以中華電信為例。國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
    鍾蕙如(2004)。主管-部屬交換品質、工作角色認知與工作負荷量對員工績效之影響 。 國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版，花蓮縣。
    韓曉磊（2007）。自定義角色理論在知識型員工激勵中的應用。雲南財貿學院學報社會科學版，22（6），128-129。
    鐘晨芳（2008）。國民小學校長教學領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究。國立新竹教育大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
    貳、英文部分
    Anderson, R. D., Jerman, R. E., & Constantin, J. A. (1979). A causal analysis of environment-reward-satisfaction linkages for the sales representative. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 7(11), 154-162.
    Bachrach, D. G., & Jex, S. M. (2000). Organizational citizenship and mood: An experimental test of perceived job breadth. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(3), 641-663.
    Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D.W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between effect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26 (4), 587-595.
    Blakely, G. L., Srivastava, A., & Moorman, R. H. (2005). The effects of nationality, work role centrality, and work locus of control on role definitions of OCB. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(1), 103-117.
    Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109.
    Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725.
    Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 25-44.
    Coyle-Shapiro, J. A-M., Kessler, I., & Purcell, J. (2004). Exploring organizationally directed citizenship behavior: Reciprocity or ‘it`s my job’? Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 85-106.
    Deluga, R. J. (1995). The relation between trust in the supervisor and subordinate organizational citizenship behavior. Military Psychology, 7(1), 1-16.
    DiPaola, M., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Organizational citizenship behavior in schools and its relationship to school climate. Journal of School Leadership, 11(5), 424-447.
    Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 421-444.
    Farth, J. L., Zhong, C. B., & Organ, D. W. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in the People’s Republic of China. Organization Science, 15, 241-253.
    Graen, G. (1976). Role-making processes within complex organizations. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp.1201-1245). Chicago: Rand McNally.
    Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 249-270.
    Hofmann, D. A., M. P. Frederick, & Gerras S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader–member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 170-178.
    Kamdar, D., McAllister, D. J., & Turban, D. B. (2006). All in a day`s work: How follower individual differences and justice perceptions predict OCB role definitions and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 841-855.
    Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131-146.
    Klieman, R. S., Quinn, J. A., & Harris, K. L. (2000). The influence of employee-supervisor interactions upon job breadth. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(6), 587-601.
    Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656-669.
    Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656-669.
    Lam, S. S. K., Hui, C., & Law, K. S. (1999). Organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing perspectives of supervisors and subordinates across four international samples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 594-601.
    Li, W., & Wan, W. (2007). A demographic study on citizenship behavior as in-role orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(2), 225-234.
    Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845-855.
    Morrison, E. W. (1993). Toward an understanding of employee role definitions and their implications for organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1993, 248-252.
    Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543-1567.
    O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychology attachment: The effect of compliance, identification and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492-499.
    Oplatka, I. (2006). Going beyond role expectations: Towards an understanding of the determinants and components of teacher organizational citizenship behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 385-423.
    Organ, D. W. (1977). A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction-causes-performance hypothesis preview. Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 46-53.
    Organ, D. W. (1988a). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
    Organ, D. W. (1988b). A restatement of the satisfaction-performance hypothesis. Journal of Management, 14, 547-557.
    Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85-97.
    Organ, D. W., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 157-164.
    Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 775-802.
    Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers` trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26 (3), 513-563.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Williams, M. L. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on follows’ truth in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107- 142.
    Puffer, S. M. (1987). Prosocial behavior, noncompliant behavior, and work performance among commission salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 615-621.
    Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(3), 289-298.
    Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121-139.
    Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 389-400.
    Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253.
    Schappe, S. P. (1998). The influence of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and fairness perceptions on organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Psychology, 132(3), 277-290.
    Schnake, M. (1991). Organizational citizenship: A review, proposed model, and research agenda. Human Relations, 44(7), 735-759.
    Scholl, R. W. (1981). Differentiating organizational commitment from expectancy as a motivating force. Academy of Management Review, 6, 589-599.
    Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-63.
    Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: the relationships between job satisfactions, sense of efficacy, and teachers’ extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 649-659.
    Tepper, B. J., Lockhart, D., & Hoobler, J. (2001). Justice, citizenship, and role definition effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 789-796.
    Van Dyne, L, Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal. 37(4), 765-802.
    Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & McLean Parks J. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 215-285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Weiner, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7, 418-428
    Williams, L. J., & Anderson S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behavior. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育行政與政策研究所
    94171011
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0941710111
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[教育行政與政策研究所 ] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈