政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/95463
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109951/140892 (78%)
造访人次 : 46221120      在线人数 : 697
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/95463


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95463


    题名: 企業文化與知識管理類型對企業智慧資本構成之關聯性研究
    作者: 賴冠宇
    贡献者: 林宛瑩
    賴冠宇
    关键词: 企業文化
    知識管理
    智慧資本
    組織效能
    無形資產
    corporate culture
    knowledge management
    intellectual capital
    financial performance
    日期: 2002
    上传时间: 2016-05-09 16:22:05 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 　　透過知識管理幫助智慧資本之衡量、管理已成為企業不容忽略的管理議題。學者專家建議良好的企業文化是成功推行知識管理的關鍵要素，而企業文化也顯著影響組織效能。因此，企業文化、知識管理、智慧資本與企業績效之關係即為重要的實證議題。本論文主要以國內上市櫃公司為研究對象，採用問卷調查方式，以較完整的架構探討企業文化類型、知識管理類型、智慧資本與財務績效相互間的關聯性。
    　　本研究發現企業文化與知識管理間存在顯著的關聯性，且企業文化類型與知識管理類型，分別對智慧資本各構面及其組成要素的重要程度有顯著的影響。主要實證結果顯示企業文化類型越強烈鮮明，越重視人力資源發展、創新與市場競爭的企業，則知識管理程度相對的越高，且同時重視資訊科技運用與鼓勵組織內成員間知識的交流和衝擊。高效率支持型企業文化相較於低創新官僚型企業文化，更重視人力資本、創新資本以及流程資本組成要素。
    　　彈性式高度知識管理類型相較於其他知識管理類型，在員工專業與自主、創新管理、流程成果以及顧客滿意與忠誠等資本智慧資本組成要素上的重視程度上明顯較高。彈性式高度知識管理類型相較於控制式低度知識管理類型，在人力資本、創新資本、流程資本之各項組成要素以及顧客投資與成果等顧客資本組成要素等的重視程度上明顯較高。人性化中度知識管理類型相較於控制式低度知識管理類型，在員工專業與自主等人力資本組成要素與創新資本各項組成要素的重視程度上明顯較高。
    　　研究結果亦顯示企業文化及人力資本、創新資本均與財務績效有顯著的關聯性。本研究結果所發現企業文化、知識管理、智慧資本以及財務績效四者間的關係，隱喻企業文化是企業推行知識管理及提昇經營效能的關鍵，亦即企業在推行知識管理前應先檢視本身的企業文化。此外，揭露具認知重要性之智慧資本各構面衡量指標似有助於傳遞企業隱藏價值給投資人。
    　　Measuring and managing intellectual capital through knowledge management (KM) has been perceived the most important issue in knowledge-intensive companies. It has been suggested that a supportive corporate culture cornerstones not only a successful implementation of KM system but also the effectiveness of an organization. It is essential therefore to enhance our knowledge in interrelationships among corporate culture, KM, intellectual capital and operating performance. Using a sample of firms listed in TSE and OTC and a questionnaire as research tool, this thesis explores the typologies of corporate culture and KM, and their impacts on intellectual capital and financial performance.
    　　The empirical evidence indicates that the attributes of corporate culture are significantly associated with the attributes of KM activities. Both corporate culture and KM shed significant impacts on cognitive importance of intellectual capitals. Firms with distinct corporate culture, placing more foci on human resource development, innovation and market competition tend to have more intensive knowledge management activities, information technology utilization, and exchange and lash of knowledge between the members of the organization. Compared to firms with low innovative-bureaucratic culture, firms with high effective-supportive culture concentrate more on all aspects related to human capital and innovation capital.
    　　Compared to other firms in the sample, firms with high flexibility-high degree of knowledge management activities focus more on human capital, innovation capital, and process capital. Compared to firms with high control-low degree knowledge management activities, companies characterized with humanistic-medium degree knowledge management activities emphasize more on innovation capital.
    　　The findings also show that both corporate culture attributes and components of human capital and innovation capital are significantly associated with financial performance. The results thus suggest that corporate culture is important to company success in implementing knowledge management system and business performance. It implies that companies may need to nurture a more supportive corporate culture prior to implementing a knowledge management system. The intellectual capital indicators suggested in the study may also be helpful in disclosing the hidden value of the firm to their investors.
    參考文獻: 一、中文參考文獻
    世界經理文摘，2001，用無形資產創造價值，第171期，第80- 88頁。
    李國維，2001，張忠謀點出知識經濟迷思，聯合報，3月12日，第20版。
    呂碧茹，1999，高科技產業企業文化、經營策略與人力資源發展及組織績效之關聯性研究，國立成功大學企業管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    吳明隆，2001，SPSS統計應用實務，松崗電腦。
    吳思華，2001，知識型產業之評價研究，知識經濟之產業研發暨創新衡量與評估國際研討會，台北，第9-1- 9-14頁。
    吳琮璠，謝清佳，2000，資訊管理理論與實務，智勝文化，第555- 572頁。
    周文賢，2001，多變量統計分析－SAS/STAT之應用，智勝文化。
    林士智，2001，知識管理理論模式初探－組織取向與資訊科技運用，私立東海大學工業工程研究所未出版碩士論文。
    林顯東，1999，Y2K危機與知識管理，資訊與電腦，頁44
    洪儒瑤，1999，台灣企業知識管理應用現況及其模式之研究，國立台北大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    黃宛華，1999，資訊服務業智慧資本之研究，國立政治大學企業管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    陳孟莉，2000，外在環境、企業文化與組織再造之互動對於經營績效之影響研究－以國內資訊電子業為例，國立成功大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    辜　輝，2001，企業E化知識管理策略，知行文化事業，第16- 21頁。
    廖盈昇，2000，企業文化對於知識管理應用之影響：國內企業之實證研究，國立中正大學資訊管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    劉權瑩，1999，資訊服務業知識管理之研究－以台灣HP與台灣IBM為例，國立政治大學企業管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    賴彥豪，2001，智慧資本之評量與知識管理活動－兩各個案分析，國立政治大學企業管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    龔詩哲，1999，組織文化及經營策略與企業進行電子商務應用之關係研究，私立大葉大學資訊管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    Davenport, T. H., and L. Prusak. 1998. Working Knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. 胡瑋珊譯，中國生產力中心。
    Edvinsson, L., and M. S. Malone. 1999. Intellectual Capital: realizing your company``s true value by finding its hidden roots. 林大容譯，麥田出版。
    Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1997. The knowledge-creating company. 楊子江、王美音譯，遠流。
    Stewart, T. 1998. Intellectual Capital: The new wealth of organizations. 宋偉航譯，智庫文化。
    二、英文參考文獻
    Alavi, M., and D. E. Leinder. 1999. Knowledge management systems: Issues, challenges, and benefits. Communications of the AIS 12 (March): 1-7.
    Apostolou, D., and G. Mentzas. 1999. Managing corporate knowledge: a comparative analysis of experience in consulting firms. Knowledge and Process Management 6: 129-138.
    Barney, Jay B. 1986. Organizational culture: Can it can be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review 11 (July): 656-665.
    Boulton, Richard E.S., Barry D. Libert, and Steve M. Samek. 2000. Cracking the Value Code. Harper Business.
    Buren, M. E. V. 1999. A yardstick for knowledge management. Training and Development (May): 71-78.
    Bukowitz, W. R., and G. P. Pctrash. 1997. Visualizing, measuring and managing knowledge. Research Technology Management. (July-August): 24- 31.
    Cameron, K.S., and R. E. Quinn. 1999. Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. Addison- Welsey Press.
    Cooper, R. B., and R. E. Quinn. 1993. Implications of the competing values framework for management information systems. Human Resource Management 32 (Spring): 175- 201.
    Denison, D.R. 1984. Bringing corporate to the bottom line. Organizational Dynamics 13(2): 4-22.
    DTIDC. 1997. Intellectual Capital Accounts Reporting and managing intellectual capital . DTIDC.
    Earl, Michael J., and Ian A. Scott. 1999. Opinion: What is a Chief Knowledge Officer? Sloan Management Review 40 (Winter): 29-38.
    Greengard, S. 1998. How to make KM a reality. Trends and Resources (Oct.): 90-91.
    Guthrie, J. 2000. Measuring up to change. Financial Management, London. (Dec.): 11-12.
    Hasen, M.T. 1999. The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 82-111.
    Hendriks, P. 1999. Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management 6: 91-100.
    Hope, J., and Tony Hope. 1997. Competing in the third wave: the ten key management issues of the information age. Harvard Business School Press.
    Knapp, E. M. 1998. Knowledge management. Business and Economic Review (Jul.-Sep.): 5.
    Kono Toyohiro(河野豐弘). 1990. Changing a company’s strategy and culture. Long Range Planning 27: 85-97.
    Liebowitz, J. 1999. Key ingredient to the success of an organization’s knowledge Management Strategy. Knowledge and Process Management 6: 37-40.
    Lynn, B. E. 1999. Culture and intellectual capital management: A key factor in success ICM implementation. International Journal of Technology Management 18: 590-603.
    McAdam, R., and S. McCreedy. 1999. The process of knowledge management within organizations: A critical assessment of both theory and practice. Knowledge and Process Management 6: 101-113.
    Miller, M. et.al. 1999. Measuring and reporting intellectual capital from a diverse Canadian industry perspective: Experiences, issues and prospects. Organization for Economic Co-operation and development, OECD symposium, Amsterdam.
    Nakra, P. 2000. Knowledge management: the magic is in the culture. Competitive Intelligence Review 11: 53-60.
    Osborne, A. 1998. Measuring intellectual capital: The real value of companies. The Ohio CPA Journal (Oct.-Dec.): 37-38.
    Ott, J.S. 1989. The Organizational Culture Perspective. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
    Peter, A.C. S. 1998. Systemic knowledge management: managing organizational assets for competitive advantage. Journal of Systemic Knowledge Management. (April): 17-21.
    Probst, Gilbert., Steffen Raub, and Kai Romhardt. 2000. Managing Knowledge: Building Blocks for Success. Wiley.
    Quinn, Robert E., and M. R. McGrath. 1985. The transformation of organizational culture: A competing values perspective. in P. Frost eds. Organizational Culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 315-334.
    Schein, Edgar H. 1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership. CA: Jossey-Bass Press.
    Shih, C. 1993. Corporate culture: Subtle movement beneath the surface. International Journal of Public Administration 16(11): 1699-1704.
    Society of Management Accountants of Canada, (the SMAC). 1998. The Management of Intellectual Capital: The Issues and the Practice. Issues Paper No. 16. Society of Management Accountants of Canada, Hamilton, Ontario.
    Sveiby, K. E. http://www.sveiby.com.au/
    Tan, J. 2000. Managing Knowledge- how to do it. Knowledge Management. (Mar.-Apr.): 12- 13.
    Talisayon, S. D. 2001. Knowledge and people: KM strategies 1: IT-focus or people-focus? Businessworld. Manila (Aug): 24.
    Trice, H., and J. Beyer. 1993. The Cultures of Work Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Wallach, Ellen J. 1983. Individuals and Organizations: The Cultural Match. Training and Development Journal (Feb.): 281-293.
    Woods, B. 2001. Intellectual capital and knowledge management. Chief Executive. (July): 2-3.
    Zack, Michael H. 1999. Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review 40(Summer): 45-57.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2010000394
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈