Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Issue Date: ||2016-05-09 16:55:37 (UTC+8)|
|Abstract: || 此論文研究俄羅斯、中國大陸和日本在遠東的經濟互動。狹義而言，遠東是指俄屬遠東，也就是說，西伯利亞的東部與日本海岸的西部之間的土地；廣義而言，它是指東北亞，因此，把東北亞的六個國家（俄羅斯、中國大陸、日本、南韓、北韓和蒙古） 當做研究對象。在這六個國家裡面，俄羅斯、中國大陸和北韓都是正在從計劃經濟改變到市場經濟的轉型國家。我要在此論文把經濟特區作為使轉型國家快速而順利地變成市場經濟的一個與其說有效不如說不可或缺的工具。具體而言，我要拿中國大陸的「經濟特區」和俄羅斯的「自由經濟區」，特別是「納霍德卡自由經濟區」為例。以比較優勢為基礎的處理方式使得中國大陸的經濟特區非常靠近在一個雖然過於嚴密的但是整體性的勞動密集出口產業和有希望的高科技計劃之下更單純而更狹窄的出口加工區模型，成功於外資的引進和出口的振興；而功能上太多機能，以及它所造成的法制上缺陷和混亂，使得納霍德卡自由經濟區難以得到所預期的成果，尤其是外資的引進即最緊急待解決的問題。
This paper studies about the economic interactions between Russia, the Mainland China, and Japan in the Far East. Narrowly, the Far East means the Russian Far East(RFE), namely the territories between east of Siberia and west of the coast along the Sea of Japan ; broadly it means the Northeast Asia, so the six Northeast Asian countries(Russia, the Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, and Mongolia)are cast within the range of studies. Of these six countries, Russia, the Mainland China, and North Korea are transitional countries that is converting the planning economy into the market economy. In this paper I take the special economic zone as effective, rather indispensable means to make the transitional countries move to the market economy rapidly and smoothly. Concretely, I pick up the Mainland China''s 「Special Economic Zone」(SEZ) and Russia''s 「Free Economic Zone」(FEZ), especially 「Nakhodka Free Economic Zone」(NFEZ). The excessive burden in function and the legislative defects and confusions has made it difficult for NFEZ to obtain the expected results, especially the introduction of foreign capital, that is, the most urgent problem awaiting solution for the present Russian economy, while the basis of a comparative advantage approach brought China''s SEZ quite close to a simpler and narrower 「Export Processing Zone」(EPZ)model with comprehensive, though strictly selective, promotion of labour-intensive export industries and promising high-tech projects, succeeding in the introduction of foreign investment and the promotion of export.
「The Tumen River Area Development Project」(TRADP) is originally to be thought a magnificent program that 「the United Nations Development Program」(UNDP)takes the leader in on the ground of strong economic supplements between those six Northeast Asian countries, but this project has gone wrong because of a collision of the state sovereignty of these three riparian states(Russia, the Mainland China, and North Korea)that consider the economic development in relation to their state interests. Consequently, the origin plan was obliged to shift from the creation of their common free trade zone to the development of each country''s export processing zone. So far we still find no any notable progress in it. What deserves to be picked up is a conflict between the Mainland China and RFE, the former wants to promote TRADP covering its Jilin Province, the latter warns Chinese population''s pressure and its permeate toward the inside of RFE beyond their common frontier.
To study the economic interactions between Russia, the Mainland China, and Japan, which also refers to the economic cooperation between those six Northeast Asian countries, this paper employs the one theory: 「Heckscher-Ohlin theorem」advocating that a country should export the product that is relatively intensive in using the factor with which the country is relatively well-endowed and that at the same time the country should import the product that is relatively intensive in using the factor with which the country is relatively ill-endowed than its trade partners; and the other theory: 「vent-for-surplus theory」advocating that a country, especially a developing country should appropriate domestic surplus resources to the export thereby creating an effective demand for it in the foreign market, as the theoretical framework. Heckscher-Ohlin theorem applies well in the relations between those six Northeast Asian countries because of the factor endowments is so clearly different that they are able to supply each other's wants. Especially, the abundant natural resources in RFE attract the Mainland China that is worried about future''s short of them by its huge population''s demand, while Chinese daily necessaries and food products that those Chinese relatively rich workforce produces have big markets in RFE that run short of them for the sake of the destruction of the national economy since the collapse of USSR and of its traditional distorted economic system impossible of self-sufficiency.In the other hand, surplus workforce in the Mainland China, which depress her making the situation of employment worse, has big effective demands in the labour market of RFE where an efflux of people is very serious. While such comparative advantages are static, there are dynamic comparative advantages artificially created by the concepts of new economic geography that makes much of the transportation cost arising from the distances between economic activities, the spatial agglomeration, and the industrial policy that creates comparative advantages as government''s measures, one of which is the special economic zone through tax exemption, accelerated depreciation, state subsidies for financing land use and labour costs and increased quotas for selling the products the foreign investors produce domestically.
As to the economic interactions between Russia and Japan, the farmer has a comparative advantage in its natural resources, the latter has in its capital, technology, and management system, so there are clear economic supplementary relations. Nevertheless, even peace treaty has not been signed these fifty years since a conclusion of their warfare. So, it is necessary to study the main cause that hinders the creation of their normal economic relations, that is, the problem of Northern Territories. This paper picks up the two approaches of Japan''s Foreign Ministry, the one is called「the indivisibility of economy from politics」that does not allow the promotion of their economic relations so long as the negotiations over the territorial problems are not in progress; the other is called 「the expanded equilibrium」that promotes their economic relations not necessarily after the progress of the negotiations over the territorial problems finally aiming at the balance development of these two: economic relations and negotiations over the territorial plobrems,if the problem of the Northern Territories will only be resolved at the end, while analyzing the origin of this problem and the process these negotiations about it between Russia and Japan. This paper also examines the relatively hopeful economic cooperative projects in 「Sakhalin Free Economic Zone」(SFFZ) between them.
|Source URI: ||http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2010000217|
|Data Type: ||thesis|
|Appears in Collections:||[俄羅斯研究所] 學位論文|
Files in This Item:
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.