English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46279469      Online Users : 1198
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96657


    Title: 多麗絲‧萊辛的《第五個孩子》與《浮世畸零人》：一個倫理的閱讀
    Other Titles: An Ethical Reading of Doris Lessing’s The Fifth Child and Ben, in the World
    Authors: 郭家珍
    Kuo, Chia-chen
    Keywords: Doris Lessing;The Fifth Child;Ben;in the World;Emmanuel Levinas;ethics
    Date: 2014-12
    Issue Date: 2016-05-13 14:53:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本篇以列維納斯的倫理學來閱讀多麗絲‧萊辛的《第五個孩子》與其續集《浮世畸零人》並討論在《第五個孩子》中，駱維特家族如何具現了海德格的「本體論式的居家感」，\\r以及他們拒斥班的行徑如何再現了自我的封閉內向性。當他者（班）向自我（駱維特家族）展現其臉龐及其他異性時，在列維納斯思考中所期待的倫理向度並未開展，駱維特家族反而保持沉默或視而不見。但是在續集《浮世畸零人》中，當班離開家、在世界遊蕩時，他卻得到了一位貧窮老婦人（畢\\r格斯太太）與一位妓女（德蕾莎）的熱忱款待。她們不在乎班到底是誰或是什麼，但卻對他提供了無私的幫忙與照顧。換句話說，她們成為了班的替代與俘虜，不僅對班負起所有的責任，連帶地也把班該負的責任都挪到自己的肩上，成為了「為了他者」的倫理主體。如果列維納斯修正海德格本體論的方式在於將重點從「自我」移向「他者」、從「此處」移往「彼方」，那麼萊辛這兩部關於班的作品，透過其文本政治性，則實踐了列維納斯的倫理哲學。
    This paper reads Doris Lessing’s The Fifth Child and Ben, in the World by drawing on Emmanuel Levinas’s ethics theory to explicate how the Lovatts in The Fifth Child embody the Heideggerian homeliness of ontology and to show how their rejection and exclusion of Ben represents the secluded interiority of the self. When the face of the other (Ben) shows itself, the ethical dimension that Levinas expects to initiate does not unfold accordingly. Instead, the Lovatts remain silent or even walk away. However, while Ben is away from home and is wandering around in the world in the sequel, he receives warm and hospitable welcomes from Mrs. Briggs and from Teresa who do not even bother to know who he really is. They become the substitution for and hostage of Ben, respectively, as they not only take responsibility for him, but also responsibility of him. In accordance with Levinas’s ethics, which reverses Heidegger’s ontology by emphasizing the dislocation from “here” to “there”\\r and of de-subjectification from “mine” to “the other,” Lessing pursues such Levinasian ethics in terms of textual politics in her two books on Ben
    Relation: 文山評論：文學與文化, 8(1),1-27
    The Wenshan Review of Literature and Culture
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[文山評論：文學與文化 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    8-1(001-027).pdf1345KbAdobe PDF2575View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback