English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 20 |  Items with full text/Total items : 90029/119959 (75%)
Visitors : 24039461      Online Users : 168
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96731


    Title: 信賴保護原則與法令不溯及既往——兼評最高行政法院九十四年度判字第一四四號判決
    Other Titles: The Principle of Reliance Protection and the Principle of Non-Retroactivity of Laws and Regulations
    Authors: 林三欽
    Lin, San-Chin
    Keywords: 信賴保護原則;法令不溯及既往原則;法令溯及適用;信賴保護措施;信賴基礎;信賴表現;信賴值得保護
    Date: 2007-12
    Issue Date: 2016-05-20 10:43:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以「信賴保護原則」為基礎,探討「法令不溯及既往原則」於行政法領域之適用問題。本文首先剖析人民主張信賴保護的要件,也整理各種可能的信賴保護措施。針對新舊法秩序如何銜接的問題,除了立法者應於法令修正時予以規範外,本文認為執法者亦得於解釋法令時,表達新舊法應如何銜接的見解。此外,本文也彙整法令溯及適用問題的各種思考模式,並主張建構以「案例事實發展階段之觀察」為基礎的思考模式。在處理具體個案時,本文認為應該分為二階段來思考:先檢視當事人是否具備主張信賴保護的要件,再討論修正後的新法秩序得否合法的溯及適用於本案。最後,本文將以二則實例來驗證本文所提出之理論。
    This article discusses the legal issues regarding the application of the” principle of non-retroactivity of laws and regulations” in the field of administrative laws based on the “principle of reliance protection.” This article begins with an analysis of the requirements of reliance protection and possible reliance protection measures when people allege their rights based on the principle of reliance protection. As to the issue of how to link old and new legal orders, this article believes that the legislature should enact relevant provisions when it revises laws, and the enforcement agency may also provide opinions when it interprets laws and regulations. Furthermore, this article compiles different thinking methods regarding the retroactivity of laws and regulations and suggests using the thinking method based on the” observation of the facts of the case in different stages.” When dealing with cases, this article provides two thinking stages: first, examine whether the claimant meets all the requirements of reliance protection; second, consider whether the new legal order may legitimately retroactively apply to the case. In the final section, two cases will be used to verify the theory provided by this article.
    Relation: 法學評論, 100, 57-134
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    100(57-134).pdf1330KbAdobe PDF4988View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback