English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46274401      Online Users : 1295
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97398


    Title: 經典考據與晚清「經世」思潮：以孫詒讓及其《周禮》研治「經歷」為中心
    Other Titles: The Textual Research on Confucian Classics and the Ideological Trend of Jingshi during the Late Qing Period: Sun Yirang’s Studies on the “Rites of the Zhou”
    Authors: 徐佳貴
    Xu, Jia-gui
    Keywords: 經世;經典;考據;孫詒讓;《周禮》
    Jingshi;Confucian classics;textual research;Sun Yirang;“Rites of the Zhou”
    Date: 2014-05
    Issue Date: 2016-06-02 16:46:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 以往關於晚清「經世」思想的討論，往往依附於凸顯漢宋、今古之分的「學派史」書寫範式，或將之等同於具體的變革建議與「政策」分析。本文以晚清治經家孫詒讓研治《周禮》、著書立說的經歷為線索，意在強調，「經世」是一個在時政刺激下，將「學」提升到「政」的層面從而予以合法化的「套語」，本有超越學術派分的性質；它誘使士人對於王朝興替、政制變遷作出「學術化」的解釋，而這套由學及政的「思維模式」，也直接影響到「學」本身的命運。清代經典考據之風相對科舉「正途」，規模始終有限，而在觀念上，「士」亦始終以「仕」為原則性的目標，致使「政」「學」難以兩分。但經典考據雖有研求精密之「學」、以探求精確之「政」的期許，終卻只能以一種去精密化的形式進入「經世」語境，經典不言自明的正當性之下是始終曖昧難明、又始終難以回避探討的「實用性」。晚清西力東漸，西學西政自身的源流漸為士人所體認，經典復從正當性之源泉的一面退卻；治經之士固可基於自身訴求，置身經世浪潮，可經學與對經世之道的闡發終被視為歧出兩路，「所學」已然無關「所用」。結合時人表述與表述的社會形成機制，「經世」一語所指涉的近代觀念變遷，或可由此得到較前更直觀也更為立體的呈現。
    Past studies on the ideological trend called Jingshi (statecraft) in the Late Qing period mostly centered on the history of schools of thought, or were equated with specific analyses on proposals for reform and policy analysis. With a focus on Sun Yirang’s academic career in the “Rites of the Zhou”, this article emphasizes that Jingshi was a widely used term that justified xue (learning) at the level of zheng (administration) and hence overcame the traditional boundaries of the schools of learning. The term also induced a vision attributing administrative change to the transformation of learning, and then directly influenced the fate of learning itself. In comparison to the imperial examination as a common path of self-fulfillment for the literati, the textual research on Confucian classics in the Qing Dynasty was altogether of a limited scale. Furthermore, the literati (shi) were regarded in principle as officials or quasi-officials instead of scholars, which made it practically impossible to distinguish xue from zheng. Although the textual research concentrated on understanding the accuracy of learning and through it the correctness of administration, ultimately it was only able to see Jingshi through a muddy lens. Compared with the self-evident legitimacy of the Confucian classics, the research was vague and it was difficult to avoid questions about its practicability, especially with the arrival of Western learning. Although its researchers were able to participate in the ideological trend of Jingshi, their in depth research was considered as separate from the analyses of the classics. From the perspective of the interplay between the texts and the society, the related ideological transition in modern China could be viewed in a direct and multi-dimensional way with this research.
    Relation: 政治大學歷史學報, 41, 105-148
    The Journal of History
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學歷史學報 THCI Core ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    41-3.pdf1415KbAdobe PDF2337View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback