English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140900 (78%)
Visitors : 46067378      Online Users : 1310
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97580


    Title: 目標設定方式與目標預期差異對認知與工作表現之影響
    Authors: 汪孝慈 ; 陳彰儀 
    Keywords: VIE值 ; 工作 ; 方式 ; 目標 ; 表現 ; 值問卷 ; 差異 ; 問卷 ; 設定 ; 預期 ; 認知
    Date: 1992-08
    Issue Date: 2016-06-04 13:51:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究的目的是欲了解目標設定方式與目標預期差異對個體工作動機的影響。本 實驗的受試為 120 名國立政治大學學生，以 6 人為一組，每組受試隨機指派到參與目標設 定或指派目標之中的一個實驗處理。研究採用 2 × 2 （目標設定方式：參與式或指派式× 目標預期差異：一致或不一致）的二因子實驗設計，依變項為受試在文書校對工作上的工作 表現、三認知成份（ VIE 值， V 代表主觀價值觀，E 代表期望值，I 代表獲利可能）的問 卷回答改變情形以及對目標接受的程度。研究結果發現，指派目標組在團體目標和個人的預 期一致時的工作表現高於預期不一致時； 參與目標設定組在預期不一致時的 VIE 值增加量 大於預期一致時； 在預期不一致時，參與目標設定組的 VIE 增加量大於指派目標組；參與 目標設定組對團體目標的接受度高於指派目標組；而預期一致時對團體目標的接受度高於預 期不一致時。最後，研究者討論造成此結果的一些可能原因，並檢討在實驗進行中可能產生 的一些偏差及對未來研究的一些建議。
    The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of goal setting and expectancy on individual`s motivation. One hundred and twenty students were assigned randomly to 4 experimectal conditions differing in terms of goal setting methods (assigned vs. participatively set goals) and goal-expectancy differences (consistent vs. different). The results indicated that: (a) For assigned goals groups, expectancy consistent groups performed better than expectancy different groups (b) For expectancy different groups, participatively set goals groups had greater VIE increment than assigned goals groups, (c) For those with participatively set goals, expectancy different groups had greater VIE increment than expectancy consistent groups, (d) participatively set goal groups had higher goal acceptance than assigned goal groups, and (e) expectancy consistent groups had higher goal acceptance than expectancy different groups.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 15,1-20
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2304View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML2392View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback