English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46286116      Online Users : 774
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97624


    Title: 教師道德推理測驗之發展
    Authors: 張鳳燕
    Keywords: 教師道德推理測驗
    Date: 1995-09
    Issue Date: 2016-06-04 14:00:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在道德認知發展領域的研究中，Kohlberg的Moral Judgment Interview （MJI） 及 Rest 的 Defining Issues Test （ DIT ）是兩種測量道德推理的有效工具。但是 Rest 建議為了能更精確解釋及預測專業成員的道德行為，研究者應自各個專業中發掘道德難題。 因為取自真實情境的道德兩難推理測驗，當比 MJI 或 DIT 此兩種假設性的道德推理測驗， 更能有效解釋及預測專業成員的道德行為。 本文是在 Rest 指導下， 發展適用於教學的「教師道理推理測驗」（ THE TEST OF TEACHERS` MORAL REASONING, TTMR ）。 TTMR 的研究共分兩個階段，第一階段工作主要是 經由深度訪談，發展出七個道德兩難故事及道德考慮因素。結果顯示在加權後的「重要性排 序」分數的 t 考驗上，「專家老師」的分數顯著高於「新手教師」， 顯示此測驗具有初步 效度。 第二階段工作是以修訂後的 TTMR 及中文版 DIT 為工具， 對 223 名國小老師及 108 名師 院學生施測。 主要目的是進一步找出 TTMR 最佳計分方式及再考驗 TTMR 的信效度。 在對 TTMR 的三十二種計分指標作種種信效度考驗後， 結果發現「因素分析取向」的第一種計分 指標的信效度最高。效度檢驗顯示：ヾ TTMR 與「道德提名」的相關顯著高於 TTMR 與「人 緣提名」的相關； ゝ「道德專家老師」的 TTMR 分數顯著高於「非道德專家老師」的 TTMR 分數； ゞ小學老師的 TTMR 分數顯著高於師院學生的 TTMR 分數； 以及々 TTMR 與中文版 DIT 有低度相關。 更值得注意的是 TTMR 較中文版 DIT 在分別老師的道德判斷上，更具區 辨力。
    A two phase study was conducted to develop a teaching-specific moral reasoning test, involving refinement of test scale indices. All cata for both phases of the study were collected in Taiwan. The Test of Teachers` Moral reasoning (TTMR) was developed and used in the first phase study. Subjects were asked to rate the importance of each of 15 "consideration statements" related to moral dilemmas presented in story form and to rank the three most important statements form each story. Forth three teacher college students served as the novice group and 26 teaching faculty and ex-teachers were ominated to serve as the expert group. T-tests comparisons of the weighted scores for the rankings show that the experts scored higher than the novices on the TTMR. Phase Two of the sutdy employed the revisec TTMR and the Chinese Defining Issues Test (DIT) as instruments. Samples included 223 primary school teachers and 108 teacher college students. The primary school teachers were divided into morally expert and less morally expert teachers, according to the morality nomination. The peer popularity nominations also separated the teachers into popular and less popular teacher categories. Thirty two indexing methods for the TTMR had been tried in order to see which consistently yielded the best results. The findings showed that the TTMR was valid and reliable. Results also indicated that, compared with the Chinese DIT, the TTMR better differentiated the morally expert teachers from the less morally expert teachers. Limitations and suggestions for future studies were also discussed.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 18,103-138
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2300View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML2417View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback