English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 90756/120810 (75%)
Visitors : 25013692      Online Users : 321
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97644

    Title: A Comparative Analysis of Alternative Evaluation Approaches
    Other Titles: 評量方法之分析比較
    Authors: 尚惠芳
    Keywords: 過程評量法 ; 全面性評量法 ; 非正式主觀評量法
    Judgmental model ; Decision-facilitation model ; Naturalistic model
    Date: 1997-12
    Issue Date: 2016-06-04 14:44:52 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本篇論文旨在探討與比較現行的幾種評量方法。文中將一一分析過程評量法 (Judgmental Model),全面性評量法 (Decision-Facilitation Model),及非正式主觀評量 法 (Naturalistic Model) 之基本理論及其優缺點。 比較結果顯示,全面性評量法 (Decision-Facilitation Model) 最能夠提供教師及校方主管人員對整個教學與校務發展流 程,有一個清晰明確的架構,以作為改進的依據。
    The purpose of this paper is to make a thorough study of three alternative evaluation models which are the judgmental model, the decision-facilitation model, and the naturalistic model. Scriven's goal-free evaluation approach, Stufflebeam's CIPP model, and Stake's responsive evaluation approach will be selected and presented from those alternative evaluation models, respectively. The rationale, strengths, and weaknesses of those three evaluation approaches will be compared and analyzed. By comparison, Stufflebeam's CIPP model is the most useful and helpful evaluation approach in providing program directors and teachers with a clear record-keeping framework regarding how the school program is going.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 20(下),203-215
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback