English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88295/117812 (75%)
Visitors : 23403257      Online Users : 120
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97865

    Title: 大學生教學評鑑量表之發展研究
    Other Titles: Development of Student Instructional Rating Scale
    Authors: 張郁雯
    Keywords: 教學有效性 ; 學生評量 ; 大學教學 ; 驗證性因素分析
    Teaching effectiveness ; Student rating ; University teaching ; Confirmatory fator analysis
    Date: 2003-06
    Issue Date: 2016-06-13 11:07:27 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究報告輔仁大學理工學院發展教學評鑑量表的過程,其基本理念是教學評量要能發揮改善教學功能,必須是師生都能以嚴肅認真的態度面對教學評量。因此,研究開始先由理工學院院長及各系系主任等組成教學評量研議小組,透過小組的討論定位教學評量的角色。然後由研究者根據教育心理學的相關研究相關的教學評量量表找出影響學生學習成效的重要教學向度,擬定量表草稿。接著請院內所有專兼任教師對量表項目達成其教學目標的重要性進行評量。同時,請大三、大四高年級學生就其所修習過的課程中選擇一門最喜歡或最不喜歡的課程,評定該課程的教師的教學行為。刪除預測結果不佳的題目後,編成正式量表。正式施測的結果,量表內部一致性信度為0.96、再測信度0.80,各分量表的信度在0.72到0.95間。量表能夠有效區分績優教師與一般教師,量表的結構分析頗符合原先八個有效的教學向度。
    The Study described the development of a Student Instructional Rating Scale in the College of Science and Engineering, Fu-Jen Catholic University. In the beginning, the role of evaluation of teaching effectiveness was discussed and determined by the committee on instruction evaluation composed of the college dean and department chairmen. Questionnaire items were drafted based on research findings from educational psychology as well as developed instruments. Faculty rated the importance of each item to achieve their teaching goals. Junior and senior students selected a course he/she liked or disliked and rated the course teacher’s teaching behavior. Items which did not have good characteristics were deleted. The internal reliability of the scale was 0.96.Test-retest reliability was0.80. The internal reliabilities for subscales ranged from 0.72 to 0.95. There was significant difference between the ratings from exemplary teachers and general teachers. Confirmatory factor analysis found that the 8-factor model fitted data moderately well.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 26(2),227-239
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback