English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88272/117759 (75%)
Visitors : 23395132      Online Users : 130
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97897


    Title: AHP和CPC之比較--以教育資料為例
    Other Titles: A Comparison of the AHP and CPC by Using Educational Data
    Authors: 葉連祺
    Keywords: 分析層級法 ; 階層分析法 ; 成對比較 ; 連續成對比較法
    Analytic Hierarchy Process ; Paired comparison ; Chainwise Paired Comparisons
    Date: 2004-12
    Issue Date: 2016-06-13 11:19:54 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 儘管層級分析法(AHP)已被廣泛應用於國內教育和其他領域建構指標及決策的研究中,但仍有一些分析方法的問題需要解決。近年來,論者針對該法提出不少改良的新方法,其中連續成對比較法(CPC)有簡化成對比較次數、運算簡易等優點,具參考應用的價值,值得注意。本研究自理念、分析流程、方法、應用現況等方面比較兩者,發現兩者有相似的理念和分析流程,但是分析方法截然不同,AHP較為完整且被廣泛採用,CPC則嫌簡略且無人應用。以實際教育資料考驗,發現兩者分析結果不相同,CPC在輸入值的邏輯一致性、輸出權重值及其次序的誤差等方面,均明顯優於AHP。
    Although Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been widely used in the education and other areas studies of index and decision-making in Taiwan, it still has some methodological problems needed to be resolved. There are some new methods have been proposed recently to improve the AHP. The Chainwise Paired Comparisons (CPC) is the noticeable one, which reduced the frequency of paired comparison and operated simply. The study compared AHP with CPC in analytic ideas, procedure, operation, and application. It found that AHP was similar to CPC in analytic ideas and procedure but was different in operation. AHP has a complete analytic system and was widely used, but CPC was not. Using practical educational data to test, it showed that AHP ’s outcomes were different from CPC. In the consistency of input data and the item errors in weights and its orders, CPC were more excellent than AHP.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 27(4),751-774
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML630View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML683View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback