English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109927/140876 (78%)
Visitors : 45968608      Online Users : 48
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97987


    Title: 特定明確原則與機動性通訊監察
    Other Titles: The Particularity Requirement and Roving Surveillance
    Authors: 李榮耕
    Li, Rong-Geng
    Keywords: 令狀原則;特定明確原則;相當理由;通訊監察;監聽;機動性通訊監察
    Warrant Requirement;Particularity Requirement;Probable Cause;Communication Surveillance;Wiretapping;Roving Surveillance
    Date: 2012-04
    Issue Date: 2016-06-17 11:36:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 令狀原則的規範目的在於藉由法院的審查程序確保偵查機關不會提出無相當理由的強制處分聲請。這從我國實證上的各樣數據可以獲得證明。作為令狀原則的衍生概念，特定明確原則的目的在於進一步確保強制處分的發動具有相當理由，防止執行官員恣意進行搜索。依據釋字第六三一號解釋的意旨，在通訊監察中，也有特定明確原則的適用。此外，我國通保法已有明文，通訊監察書上必須記載監察對象、通訊種類、號碼及處所等事項。判斷令狀上的記載是否合於特定明確原則之標準應在於，其記載是否得以確保強制處分具有相當理由，並可防止偵查機關恣意侵害人民之憲法權利。是故，在有嚴謹之要件及程序可以控制偵查機關之監察權限時，法制上應可採行機動性通訊監察。若採行此一制度，本文建議，其要件應為，有相當理由可信監察對象的行為有妨礙通訊監察之虞。再者，必須是有相當理由可信監察對象即將或已經開始使用一定設備或是電話線路時，方可開始進行監察。
    The purpose of the warrant requirement is to prevent law enforcement from making applications without probable cause through court review proceeding. This can be proven by practical data. The particularity requirement stems from the warrant requirement, and ensures that the police do not search a place in which there is no probable cause to believe that evidence can be found. Based on J. Y. Interpretation No. 631, the particularity requirement applies to communication surveillance as well. CPSL also has related provisions. The standard to determine whether a warrant is compliant with the particularity requirement is whether the descriptions are capable of ensuring the probable cause of searches and seizure and protecting people’s constitutional rights. Thus, with proper procedures to control surveillance power, roving surveillance could be adopted. This article suggests that a court may issue a roving surveillance warrant only when there is probable cause to believe that the target’s action could have the effect of thwarting interception. In addition, the warrant authoring interception is limited to interception only for such as it is reasonable to presume that the target is or was reasonably proximate to the instrument through which such communication will be or was transmitted.
    Relation: 法學評論126,105-153頁
    Chengchi law review
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    126(105-153).pdf2135KbAdobe PDF2222View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback