English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 87924/117065 (75%)
Visitors : 23342662      Online Users : 145
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98030


    Title: 晚清民國禁革奴婢買賣的理念與實踐
    Other Titles: The Context of Prohibition against Human Trafficking in Late Qing and the Republic of China
    Authors: 黃源盛
    Huang, Yuan-Sheng
    Keywords: 奴婢;半人半物;人口買賣;人權;晚清民國
    Nupi;the Mixture of Goods and People;Human Trafficking;Human Rights;Late Qing Dynasty and Republic of China
    Date: 2013-09
    Issue Date: 2016-06-20 10:49:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 傳統中國,歷代統治者為了鞏固專制政體,總是把社會成員按其不同的階級、身分、地位、職業,分為不同等級,賦予不同的法律地位,明顯是一種身分等差的社會秩序。漢以後的法律,尤其從《唐律》到《大清律例》,奴婢均被列為「賤民」。而所謂的「賤民」,名稱並不一致,唐代主要包括部曲、客女、樂人、雜戶、官戶、奴婢等;清代則以士、農、工、商四民為良,奴婢及娼優、隸卒為賤。歷朝各代對於略賣及誘賣良人為奴婢均有禁條,但對於「奴婢買賣」卻是法之所許。這種規範的背後制度為何?思想理據何在?降及清末,為什麼一反過去,有了新局面出現?弔詭的是,到了二十一世紀的今天,打開《中華民國刑法》第二九六條及第二九六條之一,赫然還有「使人為奴隸」及「買賣質押人口」的兩種犯罪類型,何以致之?這攸關百年來晚清民國的「自由、平等、尊嚴」的人權發展歷程,很值得細細追索。\r法制歷史的迷人處,在變與不變之間,何以奴婢買賣歷久不替?到了晚清,又何以突然生變?探討歷史事件不僅在於釐清當時的歷史事實是什麼?還要追問為什麼歷史的現象會是如此?甚至要再進一步聯結歷史的過去、現在與未來,探尋其中意義之所在。
    In traditional China, the emperors always divided their people into different social classes of different statuses of law according to their social status, professions and so on. Apparently, it was a hierarchy of social order. After the Han Dynasty, especially from the Tang Code to the Great Qing Legal Code, slaves were ranked as untouchables. The names of slaves were diverse. In the Tang Dynasty, for example, they included Puchu(部曲), Kenu(客女), Yuehjen(樂人), Tsahu (雜戶), Kuanhu(官戶) and Nupi(奴婢). In the Qing Dynasty, the intellectuals, farmers, workmen and businessmen were included in upper social statuses, and Nupi, Changyu(娼優)and Litsu(隸卒) were in a lower class. In different dynasties, there had always been a prohibition against human trafficking, but not including slaves. What was the system behind the legal norm? In the 21st century, why are there still two crimes of “compelling people as slaves” and “trading people” in the criminallaw of R.O.C.? The issue is concerned with the development of human rights in the late Qing Dynasty and the R.O.C., so it deserves to be researched very carefully. An intriguing aspect of legal history is between the change and the unchanged. Why was the history of the slave trade so long? Why was the phenomenon changed in the late Qing Dynasty? To research the historical fact is not only to know “what” but also to know “why”, even connecting the past with the present and the future to search its meaning.
    Relation: 法學評論, 134,47-114頁
    Chengchi law review
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966%2f102398202013090134002
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202013090134002
    Appears in Collections:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    134-2.pdf1681KbAdobe PDF198View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback