English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140903 (78%)
Visitors : 46051687      Online Users : 898
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98033


    Title: 論國民參與刑事審判制度的合憲性爭議——以日本裁判員制度之相關合憲性討論為借鏡
    Other Titles: A Study of the Constitutional Issues of the Lay Participation System in Taiwan: With Reference to Constitutional Discussions of Japan’s ＂Saiban-In＂ System
    Authors: 張永宏
    Chang, Yong-Hong
    Keywords: 國民參與審判;陪審;參審;觀審;合憲性;違憲;法官獨立;身分保障;正當法律程序
    Civil Participation;Jury System;Lay Assessor System;Lay Judge System;Constitutionality;Unconstitutionality;The Independence of Judge;The Assurance of Judge’s Status;Due Process of Law
    Date: 2013-09
    Issue Date: 2016-06-20 10:50:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 對於國民參與刑事審判制度（陪審、參審等）已經存在於制度中數百年以上的國家而言，合憲性的問題似乎並不存在，但對於日本、韓國、臺灣等東亞民主國家而言，因為憲法中似乎沒有預留國民參與刑事審判制度的空間（憲法沉默），也欠缺此種制度的法律傳統，所以合憲性的問題變得非常巨大。本文以為，我國憲法的沉默並不代表制憲者拒絕國民參與刑事審判制度，但也不代表憲法接受任何形式的審判制度。至於憲法容許國民參與刑事審判制度的底線為何？則應該從憲法條文中有關司法權、刑事被告權利的相關規定中尋找。讓具備解釋、適用法律專業的法官成為法院的當然構成員，且能充分發揮其功能，以確保抽象的法律能夠在具體個案中被正確地解釋、適用，本文認為乃是我國憲法對於司法權建制及刑事被告權利保障的基本要求，故應以此為前提，進行後續的制度設計，始能謂為合憲。
    For countries which have had the Lay Participation System (such as the Jury and Civil Judge System) for hundreds of years, constitutional problems seemingly do not exist. But for Far East Asian Countries, including Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, the lack of preservative provisions of the Lay Participation System in their Constitutions, (also called “the silence of the Constitution”), the constitutional problems could be enormous. In my opinion, the silence of the Constitution does not mean that the legislators of Taiwan’s Constitution refuse Lay Participation in any form, but at the same time it does not mean that they will accept Lay Participation in all forms. What is the lowest conceivable demand of Lay Participation from Taiwan’s Constitution? We shall investigate the provisions of judicial authority and criminal defendant’s rights in our Constitution. The substantial role of the “Judge” who has the professional ability to interpret and apply the law correctly in a tribunal, for the assurance of the abstract law can be interpreted and applied correctly in concrete cases, in my opinion, is the basic demand of judicial authority and the rights of criminal defendants in Taiwan’s Constitution. By treating the basic demand as an assumption, we may then introduce the constitutional Lay Participation System in Taiwan.
    Relation: 法學評論, 134,229-307頁
    Chengchi law review
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966%2f102398202013090134005
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202013090134005
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    134-5.pdf1238KbAdobe PDF2260View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback