English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89327/119107 (75%)
Visitors : 23829663      Online Users : 206
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98049


    Title: 民法第四八三條之一之研究——以我國實務見解及日本法為素材
    Authors: 徐婉寧
    Hsu), Wan-Ning
    Keywords: 保護照顧義務;勞工安全衛生法;保護他人之法律;債務不履行;民法第四八三條之一;民法第四八七條之一;性別工作平等法;性騷擾
    Employer’s Duty to Care for Employee Safety and Health;Labor Safety and Health Act;Civil Code § 483-1;Civil Code § 487-1;Responsibility for Damages under the Civil Code;Gender Equality in Employment Act;Sexual Harassment;Employment Injury
    Date: 2014-09
    Issue Date: 2016-06-20 11:43:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 民法債編於一九九九年時,增訂了民法第四八三條之一,明文規定「受僱人服勞務,其生命、身體、健康有受危害之虞者,僱用人應按其情形為必要之預防。」將僱用人之保護照顧義務予以明文化。然而由於民法第四八三條之一乃係一抽象規定,對於保護照顧義務之具體內容並未詳加論述,因此如何特定保護照顧義務之內容,據以主張僱用人之債務不履行損害賠償責任,對受僱人而言即為一棘手的課題。此外,關於保護照顧義務的性質、僱用人違反民法第四八三條之一時之效果,學說上仍有爭議;且自債編修正以來,縱使實務上已累積了相當的案例,學界對民法第四八三條之一相關的研究仍十分有限,且欠缺對我國近年來的實務見解為進一步分析整理之探討。因此,本文擬以實務見解為中心,先探討保護照顧義務之性質,進一步去探究其具體內容及其與勞工安全衛生法規、性別工作平等法中性騷擾防治義務之關係。隨後分析其與民法第一八四條第二項、第四八七條之一的關係,最後進行日本法之介紹與探討,冀透過比較法的觀察,對於我國民法第四八三條之一之發展及實務上的運作能有所助益。
    Civil Code § 483-1 was enacted and promulgated in 1999, and so the employer’s duty to care for employee safety and health becomes a statutory one. However, when the employee pursues the employer’s responsibility for damages in the legal context of an exploration of liability for non-performance of an obligation in a contract relationship under the Civil Code, it is very difficult for the employee to specify the content of the violation of the duty to care for safety because Civil Code § 483-1 is very abstract. In praxis of Jurisdiction in Taiwan it seems unusual to specify the actual content of such duty on the part of the employer; neither do scholarly opinions. From the both theoretical and practical aspects, through the analyses of the relationship between Civil Code § 483-1 and the Labor Safety and Health Act and the Gender Equality in Employment Act, the relationship among Civil Code § 483-1, § 487-1, and § 184, and the cases in Taiwan, this research will construct a framework of the actual content of the employer’s duty to care for safety.
    Relation: 法學評論, 138,237-304頁
    Chengchi law review
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    138(237-304).pdf1032KbAdobe PDF247View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback