政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/98057
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 109948/140897 (78%)
造訪人次 : 46080028      線上人數 : 1162
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98057


    題名: 美國法上懲罰性賠償金數額分享制度之研究
    其他題名: A Study on the Split-Recovery Punitive Damages System under U.S. Laws
    作者: 戴志傑
    Tai, Chih-Chieh
    關鍵詞: 填補性賠償金;懲罰性賠償金;數額分享法令;消費者保護基金;徵收條款;平等保護條款;過度罰金條款;正當法律程序條款
    Compensatory Damages;Punitive Damages;Split-recovery Statute;Consumer Protection Fund;Takings Clause;Equal Protection Clause;Excessive Fines Clause;\\Due Process Clause
    日期: 2015-03
    上傳時間: 2016-06-20 14:23:20 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 近年來黑心產品致害事件頻傳，故消基會即提出「消費者保護\\r 基金」草案，明訂該基金創設上之法源依據及其目的，並規範該基\\r 金之經費來源。然儘管該草案立意甚佳，但細究其內容仍有諸多疑\\r 慮與商榷之處。是故，因現今美國法上已有若干州施行懲罰性賠償\\r 金數額分享法令而實踐如同上開基金之目的，從而本文即研究該國\\r 此等數額分享制度，其中包括該制度之公共政策及其實踐疑慮，以\\r 及其已涉合憲性爭議的相關判決，尤其是聯邦最高法院於二○○七\\r 年Philip Morris USA v. Williams乙案判決後，論者間對該制度存廢\\r 與修正上所提出的相關意見。最後，希冀以該國此等制度之實踐經\\r 驗為鑑而供我國未來立法上之參考。
    Since damaging events caused by defective products have occurred frequently in recent years, the Consumers’ Foundation proposed the Consumer Protection Fund Draft, which stipulated the legal bases and purposes of creating the fund and also regulates the fund’s sources of funding. Although the idea of the draft is good, there is still room for doubts and questions concerning its contents. Since certain states in the U.S. already have enacted such split-recovery statutes through carrying out the methods that are similar to the purposes of the funds mentioned above, this thesis, therefore, examines the sharing system of U.S. public policy, its practical concerns, and its relevant decisions challenged by constitutionality. Especially, the study examines the decision for the case of Philip Morris USA v. Williams by the Supreme Court in 2007 and scholarly concerns and studies on the abolition of the system. Finally, it takes the practical experience of these systems as a reference to provide a resource for Taiwan’s future legislative references.
    關聯: 法學評論, 140,287-371頁
    Chengchi law review
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966%2f102398202015030140005
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202015030140005
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    140(287-371).pdf1165KbAdobe PDF2390檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋