English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46196883      Online Users : 812
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98126


    Title: 英國學派發展之研究－探討其對國際社會、制度與研究方法之觀點
    Other Titles: The Development of the English School and its Influence on China’s Study
    Authors: 過子庸
    Kuo, Tzu-yung
    Keywords: 英國學派;國際社會;霍布斯的傳統;康德的傳統;格勞秀斯的傳統
    English School;International Society;Hobbesian Tradition;Kantian Tradition;Grotian Tradition
    Date: 2010-07
    Issue Date: 2016-06-21 09:39:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 國際關係學雖然起源於英國，但二次大戰結束後，隨著美國成為世界強權，以及英國國際地位的下滑，其在國際關係學術中的地位也同樣拱手讓給了美國。從此以後，以「美國中心觀」的國際關係理論一直主導著國際關係學的研究方向。但是，有一批不滿以「美國中心觀」的英國國際關係學者在20世紀的60年代之後，對美國學者的研究方法與相關理論進行挑戰，並提出了許多有價值的理論，他們被稱之為「英國學派」，其研究成果已經逐漸引起其他國家的國際關係學界之重視。雖然如此，在國際關係學的研究領域中，此學派仍然是一個陌生的名詞。然而由於此學派為國際關係學術界中唯一非美國的學派，其主張有別於美國的觀點與視野來理解及研究國際關係，因此我們有必要對其加以探討。
    The study of International Relations originated from England, where the Britons had kept their lead until the rise of the United States in the wake of World War II in tandem with the fall of England’s international standing. Since then, the U.S.-centered perceptive dominated the study of the International Relations. However, after the 1960’s, some British scholars who dissatisfied “the U.S.-centered perceptive” proposed the method of study, viewpoint of theory and value driven which are different from the dominant American scholars to discuss the questions of international relation systemically and in depth and created fruitful theory results that are getting attention among academic field. Despite that, to this day, the English School remains an obscure term and its thought and arguments are not well known to scholars of International Relations. However, due to the only non American scholar school in international relations among the academic field, its study and contention is different from the perspective and the view point of American scholars.
    Relation: 國際關係學報, 30, 137-186
    Journal of international relations
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[國際關係學報] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    30(p137-186).pdf706KbAdobe PDF2446View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback