English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92720/123072 (75%)
Visitors : 26968005      Online Users : 272
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98534

    Title: 企業成長與併購
    Firm Growth and Mergers And Acquisitions
    Authors: 柳伯威
    Contributors: 蘇威傑
    Keywords: 併購
    Merger and Acquisition
    Firm Growth
    Antecedent of M&A
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-07-01 14:54:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   隨著國內企業的成長,以及商業競爭的國際化,併購已成為企業在維持及增加成長幅度時考慮的主要策略之一。過往的文獻對於企業成長理論有相當多的研究,經理人在成長歷程中的角色也被深度討論。另一方面,許多學者針對併購的動機進行討論,其中又以綜效、經理人自利與過度自信經理人為最被廣泛認可的併購動機。
    With the growing of firms in Taiwan and the internalization of commercial competition, merger and acquisition (M&A) have become one of the main strategies that firms consider when they want to keep growing. Previous studies have done a lot of research of firm growth and managers’ role on the path of growth. The antecedent of M&A has been discussed widely as well. Synergy, managerialism and hubris are the most recognized antecedents of M&A in these studies.
    Although there were a large number of studies concerning firm growth and antecedents of M&A, few focused on the relationship between them, especially none was about Taiwan’s situation. With the sample of M&A cases of Taiwanese firms from 2008 to 2014, this study examines the relationship between firm growth and antecedents of merger. This study uses regression model to analysis the impact of firm growth rate on M&A behavior. Furthermore, M&A related variables such as probability of M&A, equity bought, international M&A percentage and success rate are explained in this study.
    Two methods are used in this study to measure firm growth: sales revenue and total assets. The regression result shows that firms with higher growth rates are more likely to participate in M&A activities in both methods. While firms with higher sales growth tend to merge more foreign companies, firms with higher assets growth tend to buy more equity in M&As. To sum up, firm growth increase the probability of M&A activity. But different growth patterns can lead to variation of M&A behavior as well.
    Reference: 江逸之,2015,四個併購決策併購不敗,天下雜誌,570,152-157


    Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. The Bell Journal of Economics, 605-617.

    Anand, J., & Singh, H. (1997). Asset redeployment, acquisitions and corporate strategy in declining industries. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 99-118.

    Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. (1998). International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 7-26.

    Borenstein, S. (1990). Airline mergers, airport dominance, and market power. The American Economic Review, 80(2), 400-404.

    Bradley, M., Desai, A., & Kim, E. H. (1988). Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 21(1), 3-40.

    Capron, L., Dussauge, P., & Mitchell, W. (1998). Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988–1992. Strategic Management Journal, 19(7), 631-661.

    Conn, R. L., & Connell, F. (1990). International mergers: Returns to US and British firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 17(5), 689-711.

    Cummins, J. D., & Xie, X. (2008). Mergers and acquisitions in the US property-liability insurance industry: Productivity and efficiency effects. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(1), 30-55.

    Devos, E., Kadapakkam, P. R., & Krishnamurthy, S. (2009). How do mergers create value? A comparison of taxes, market power, and efficiency improvements as explanations for synergies. Review of Financial Studies, 22(3), 1179-1211.

    Garnsey, E., Stam, E., & Heffernan, P. (2006). New firm growth: Exploring processes and paths. Industry and Innovation, 13(1), 1-20.

    Greve, H. R. (1998). Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1),58-86.

    Hansen, G. S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1989). Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of economic and organizational factors. Strategic Management Journal, 10(5), 399-411.

    Haspeslagh, P. C., & Jemison, D. B. (1991). Managing acquisitions: Creating value through corporate renewal (Vol. 416). New York: Free Press.

    Hayward, M. L., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1),103-127.

    Hietala, T. R. (2003). Manifest design: American exceptionalism and empire. Cornell University Press.

    Higgins, M. J., & Rodriguez, D. (2006). The outsourcing of R&D through acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 351-383.

    Hymer, S., & Pashigian, P. (1962). Firm size and rate of growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 556-569.

    Jacobs, L., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1971). Self-esteem and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(1), 84.

    Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2).

    Kazanjian, R. K. (1988). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257-279.

    Kim, E. H., & Singal, V. (1993). Mergers and market power: Evidence from the airline industry. American Economic Review, 549-569.

    Kim, J. Y. J., Haleblian, J. J., & Finkelstein, S. (2011). When firms are desperate to grow via acquisition: The effect of growth patterns and acquisition experience on acquisition premiums. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(1), 26-60.

    Kumar, M. S. (1985). Growth, acquisition activity and firm size: evidence from the United Kingdom. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 33(3), 327-338.

    Lehto, E. L. O., & Lehtoranta, M. O. (2004). Becoming an acquirer and becoming acquired. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(6), 635-650.

    Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 20-43.

    Marris, R. (1964). The economic theory of managerial capitalism (Vol. 258). London: Macmillan.

    McKelvie, A., Wiklund, J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). A resource-based view on organic and acquired growth. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 9, 175-194.

    Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1990). Do managerial objectives drive bad acquisitions?. The Journal of Finance, 45(1), 31-48.

    Penrose, E. T. (1995). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press, USA, 1995.

    Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 197-216.

    Seth, A. (1990). Value creation in acquisitions: A re‐examination of performance issues. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 99-115.

    Seth, A., Song, K. P., & Pettit, R. (2000). Synergy, managerialism or hubris? An empirical examination of motives for foreign acquisitions of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), 387-405.

    Singh, A., & Whittington, G. (1975). The size and growth of firms. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(1), 15-26.
    Singh, H., & Montgomery, C. A. (1987). Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 377-386.

    Tan, D. (2003). The limits to the growth of multinational firms in a foreign market. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(8), 569-582.

    Walsh, J. P. (1988). Selectivity and selective perception: An investigation of managers' belief structures and information processing. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 873-896.

    Yasuda, T. (2005). Firm growth, size, age and behavior in Japanese manufacturing. Small Business Economics, 24(1), 1-15.
    Description: 碩士
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103351027
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    102701.pdf993KbAdobe PDF0View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback