English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88272/117759 (75%)
Visitors : 23394157      Online Users : 69
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98738


    Title: 大學教師教學評鑑量表發展之研究
    Other Titles: The Development of the University Teacher Teaching Evaluation Scale
    Authors: 鄭博真;黃義良
    Keywords: 教學評鑑;驗證性因素分析;學生評鑑教學
    confirmatory;teaching evaluation;student evaluation of teaching
    Date: 2009-06
    Issue Date: 2016-07-07 11:53:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在發展大學教師教學評鑑量表。研究者以某大學現有教學評鑑工具為基礎,並依據教學評鑑理論,透過師生意見調查、師生代表座談會議、相關文獻歸納及問卷調查分析等步驟,進行量表題目編修工作。並以嚴謹的統計檢定程序,確認本量表題目之信效度。研究工具採用自編之調查問卷和量表,以某大學全校專任教師與學生樣本進行施測,驗證性因素分析的有效問卷836份。實證資料經由項目分析、探索性和驗證性因素分析考驗,發展出由教學內容、教學方法、師生互動、學習評量和學生學習等五個構面,18個題目組成的大學教師教學評鑑量表。本工具具有良好信度與效度,且具有不受師生變項影響的複核效度,適合大學生評鑑教師教學及教師自評教學使用。
    The purpose of this study was to develop the University Teacher Teaching Evaluation Scale (UTTES). The study was based on the current teaching evaluation instrument and made reference to the theory of teaching evaluation. The scale was revised through teachers and students’ opinions reflective survey, teachers and students’ discussion, related literatures, and a questionnaire analysis. The reliability and validity of the scale was confirmed through the statistical analysis. The survey questionnaire and scale were used in this study. The subjects were the full-time teachers and student samples in the university. The empirical data were examined through item analysis, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The UTTES was consisted of 18 items. The 18 items can be divided into five dimensions: curriculum contents, teaching methods, the interaction of teachers and students, learning assessments, and students’ learning. The result showed that UTTES has a good reliability and validity. The UTTES can be used by students evaluating university teachers and teachers’ selfevaluation.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 32(2), 57-80
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    32(2)-57-80.pdf1948KbAdobe PDF263View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback