English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92604/122928 (75%)
Visitors : 26790560      Online Users : 461
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/98867
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98867

    Title: Development and validation of the social hierarchy scale
    Authors: 游琇婷
    Yu, Hsiu-Ting
    Tsai, Annie
    Yu, Chong Ho
    Contributors: 心理系
    Keywords: 文化差異;內在社會階級構念;測驗編製
    cultural difference;scale development;social hierarchy
    Date: 2015.09
    Issue Date: 2016-07-11 17:21:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究討論及發展編製「內在社會階級構念量表」(SHS),以作為測量內在社會階級構念(social hierarchy)的工具。本研究討論過去文獻中對於內在社會階級構念的定義以及此構念和其他相關構念與理論的關係,並以此作為編製此量表的依據和藍圖。本量表的編製過程共使用四個樣本,總樣本數為1,063 人。研究中描述包含題目選取、項目分析、信效度檢驗,以及因素結構分析等編製過程。所編製的「內在社會階級構念量表」採用李克特氏七點量表評分,共計32 題且包含兩個分量表。兩個16 題的分量表之向度結構也以因素分析進行驗證。本量表在兩項信度指標(內部一致性、重測信度)以及四項效度指標(內容效度、建構效度、聚合效度,以及區辨效度)的檢驗均有良好的信效度表現。結論亦針對本量表用於社會科學研究和其他可能的應用進行討論。
    The Social Hierarchy Scale (SHS) was developed as a measurement tool of the construct of social hierarchy. Its development began with a comprehensive literature review and an in-depth discussion of the definition and practices of social hierarchy. Four samples, a combined total of 1,063 participants, were involved during the course of developing the scale. The processes of items’ formation, selection, evaluation, and inclusion in the final scale are detailed. The final SHS consisted of 32 items using a 7- point Likert scale rating scheme. The two subscales, each with 16 items, are also confirmed by factor analyses. The psychometric properties of the scale have been confirmed to meet quality standards by two measures of reliability (internal reliability and testretest reliability) and four measures of validity (content validity, construct validity, convergent validity, and discriminate validity). This research concludes with a discussion of the importance of developing the SHS from an indigenous approach, as well as possible contributions to and applications in social science.
    Relation: Psychological Testing, 62(3), 181-208
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    181-208.pdf569KbAdobe PDF345View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback