English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 94188/124659 (76%)
Visitors : 29644435      Online Users : 363
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/98897
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98897

    Title: Dickie的藝術制度理論
    Dickie’s institutional theory of art
    Authors: 李佳穎
    Lee, Chia Ying
    Contributors: 鄭光明
    Cheng, Kuang Ming
    Lee, Chia Ying
    Keywords: George Dickie
    George Dickie
    institutional theory of art
    analytical aesthetics
    the definition of art
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-07-11 17:40:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 寫作這篇論文的動機,是為了探討哲學家George Dickie的藝術制度理論(Dickie’s institutional theory of art)。在第一章中,回顧哲學家Arthur Danto與Morris Weitz的反本質主義(anti-essentialism),及其如何影響Dickie藝術制度理論的發展,以及研究制度理論的重要性;第二章中,說明Dickie的藝術制度理論內容,並以實際的作品為例子講述藝術制度理論的應用;第三章至第四章中,整理反對藝術制度理論的數個哲學家(Jeffery Wieand, Robert Stecker, Stephen Davis, Richard Wollheim, Noël Carroll)的重要論點,並為Dickie的藝術制度理論辯護。最後第五章為結論,提出「藝術眼鏡」此一觀點用以修正藝術制度理論。
    The purpose of this paper is to investigate George Dickie’s institutional theory of art. I will first discuss Arthur Danto and Morris Weitz’s anti-essentialism, which is the groundwork for Dickie’s institutional theory of art. I will then discuss Dickie’s institutional theory of art, which has been developed as two versions. Both versions have been widely criticized. Stephen Davis argues that art created outside any institution seems possible, although Dickie’s institutional theory of art rules it out. Noël Carroll argues that Dickie’s definition of art is circular, and his institutional theory of art fails to distinguish art institutions from other social institutions. Jeffery Wieand argues that Dickie’s perceptually indistinguishable objects argument fails to show that his institutional theory of art is tenable. In this paper, I will argue that Dickie’s theory can be modified as “the glass theory of art.” If this is true, then these criticisms fail to undermine Dickie’s theory, and Dickie’s theory is still powerful.
    Reference: Carroll, Noël. (1999). Philosophy of Art. London, UK: Routledge.
    Carroll, Noël. (2001). Identifying Art. In Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays (pp. 75-100). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Danto, A.C. (1981). Works of Art and Mere Real Things. In The Transfiguration of the Commonplace (pp. 1-32). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Davis, Stephen. (1991). Definitions of Art. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Dickie, George. (1974). What Is Art? An Institutional Analysis. In Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis (pp. 426-437). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Dickie, George. (1997). The Art Circle: A Theory of Art. Evanston, IL: Chicago Spectrum Press.
    Dickie, George. (1998). Wollheim’s Dilemma. British Journal of Aesthetics, 38, 2: 127-135.
    Dickie, George. (2000). The Institutional Theory of Art. In Theories of Art Today (pp. 93-108). Edited by Noël Carroll. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
    Edmunds, David & Nigel Warburton, (2010). Philosophy Bites. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Stecker, Robert. (1986). The End of an Institutional Definition of Art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 26, 2: 124-132.
    Weitz, Morris. (1956). The Role of Theory in Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 15: 27-35; reprinted in P. Lamarque and S. H. Olsen eds. (2004). Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: The Analytic Tradition (pp. 12-18). UK, Oxford: Blackwell.
    Weitz, Morris. (1977). Art as an Open Concept. In The Opening Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Wieand, Jeffery. (1994). Perceptually Indistinguishable Objects. In Institutions of Art: Reconsiderations of George Dickie’s Philosophy (pp. 39-49), ed. Robert J. Yanal. Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Translate by G. E. M. Anscomb. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    Wollheim, Richard. (1980). The Institutional Theory of Art. In Art and Its Objects, 2nd edition (pp. 157-166). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Wollheim, Richard. (1987). Painting as an Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Description: 碩士
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1021540011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    001101.pdf3298KbAdobe PDF1110View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback