English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 20 |  Items with full text/Total items : 90029/119959 (75%)
Visitors : 24034427      Online Users : 132
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 東亞研究 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/99245
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99245


    Title: 理論移植或創新:新自由主義在中國國際關係學界的發展(1998-2008)
    Other Titles: Copying or Innovation? The Development of Neoliberalism in Chinese International Relations Scholarship (1998~2008)
    Authors: 張登及;余佳芳
    Chang, Teng-Chi;Yu, Chia-Fang
    Keywords: 國際關係理論;新自由主義;知識社群;中國外交
    International Relations;Neoliberalism;Epistemic Communities;Chinese School
    Date: 2011-01
    Issue Date: 2016-07-20 16:14:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 現代國際關係理論主要是由西方的知識社群所形塑。對於崛起中的大國,其論述大都以結構現實主義的視角分析,認為國家會根據權力多寡與處於國際體系的位置,調整對外政策。中國作為一個崛起中國家,自然亦不例外。不同於結構現實主義,新自由主義對於冷戰後區域經濟整合、國家相互依賴與國際組織參與提供了不同的視角。這也鼓舞中國內部不少學者,以新自由主義理論的角度,思考與闡述中國的崛起。本文的研究即以90年代末以來中國國關學界對新自由主義的研究做為主要分析重點,從中找出論述的主要類型與對中國國關學界具有重大影響的核心人物,探討由西方發展出來的新自由主義,經過中國知識社群「臨摹」與「改造」,是否會產生理論移植或創新的現象,並探討其論點發展趨向。而本文結論認為,中國國關學界經由引介西方自由主義國關理論,確實帶來豐富的理論反思與創新動機。但其知識社群的理論進步毋寧說還處在「初級階段」,其未來動向值得台灣同行密切觀察。
    The contemporary discipline of International Relations (IR) is mainly characterized by mainstream theories of the West. Especially, from the viewpoint of neorealism, rising powers in the system are expected to challenge the incumbent hegemon and hence try to rewrite the established order. After the end of the Cold War, in contrast to neorealism, literature of neoliberalism stresses interdependence and nations’ participation in international organizations. Based on the learning and copying of the imported Western theories above, Chinese IR scholars manage to explore the meaning of the rise of China highlight its cooperation with the established order, with the insights of neoliberalism in particular. This study aims at analyzing the discourse of Chinese IR scholarship in neoliberalism. It further compare the main promises of neoliberalism and the Chinese studies of it to find out whether Western neoliberalism will be innovated through Chinese scholars’ imitation and transformation. Finally, by bringing together Chinese scholars’ neoliberalist studies, it offers a prospect of the future development of Chinese IR studies, including the rise of “Chinese School”.
    Relation: 東亞研究, 42(1), 45-84
    East Asia Studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[東亞研究] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    42(1)p45-84.pdf1907KbAdobe PDF524View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback