政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99246
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 86525/115230 (75%)
Visitors : 23149772      Online Users : 112
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99246


    Title: 調解者與北韓核武危機
    Other Titles: Mediator and North Korea Nuclear Crisis
    Authors: 林文謙
    Lin, Wun-Cian
    Keywords: 調解者;第三方干預;主要調解者;北韓核武危機;中立調解者
    Mediator;North Korea Nuclear Crisis;Third-Party Intervention;Principal Mediator;Neutral Mediator
    Date: 2011-01
    Issue Date: 2016-07-20 16:14:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文嘗試由「調解」(mediation)的角度來研究北韓核武危機,目的是針對其中的調解者進行分析,以加深吾人的認識。透過Thomas Princen在國際衝突的調解者一書當中所作出的分類,本文檢視爭端當中調解者的角色、特質和能力,並評估調解的結果與相關影響要素。研究發現如下:首先,在這場僵局當中,除美國、北韓與南韓等主要方之外,尚包括諸多國家或非國家形式的調解者。其次,在緩和衝突方面,中國與俄羅斯等主要調解者可以藉由實質利益或威脅要求爭端各方讓步。但因自身亦具有政治或地緣上之利益,所以難以使美國同意讓出調解程序的控制權。另外,國際原子能總署、聯合國秘書長(副秘書長)、以及美國前總統卡特等中立調解者,主要倚賴自身公正、公平或良好的名聲來博取爭端者的信任,其在緩和衝突上亦能有所貢獻。最後,除軍事武器布局與戰略規劃之外,筆者認為「調解」的思維是構建朝鮮核武僵局解決之道的另一個可行選項,值得未來深入探究。
    This article attempts to study the North Korea nuclear crisis from the standpoint of “mediation”, particularly in efforts to enhance our understanding the concept of mediator. In the Intermediaries in International Conflict, Thomas Princen classified several types of actors in international conflicts. Applied this framework this article analyze the mediator’s role, characteristics, and capability, while also evaluates that mediation outcome and factors associated with successful mediation. This article has the following finds: first, besides such principal parties as U.S., North Korea and South Korea, this deadlock also includes many mediators who have characteristics of state or non-state actor. Second, China and Russia (principal mediators) can reconciliation this conflict by benefit and threat. But because they have interests of politics or geography, hence the U.S. Government cannot agree if they gain the control power in the conciliation process. Moreover, IAEA, UN Secretary General (Vice-Secretary General) and Jimmy Carter which neutral mediators also can settle this conflict rely on their just, fair or good reputation. Finally, in addition to military weapons and strategy plans, this article found that the thought of mediation is a feasible option to settle the North Korea nuclear crisis.
    Relation: 東亞研究, 42(1), 85-126
    East Asia Studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[East Asia Studies] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    42(1)p85-126.pdf1984KbAdobe PDF183View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback