English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89327/119107 (75%)
Visitors : 23857852      Online Users : 415
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99287


    Title: 高階經營團隊對於公司風險追求的影響
    The Influence of Top Management Team on Corporate Risk Taking
    Authors: 蔡旻諭
    Tsai, Min Yu
    Contributors: 蘇威傑
    蔡旻諭
    Tsai, Min Yu
    Keywords: 高階經營團隊
    風險追求
    高層理論
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-07-20 16:37:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究主要目的在於探討高階經營團隊(Top Management Team)的成員組成背景是否會影響公司風險追求(Risk Taking)的程度,並且採用Hambrick & Mason (1984)所提出之高層理論的觀點,將高階經營團隊視為組織的反射鏡,進而觀察高階經營團隊的組成背景(教育程度、國外經驗、專業異質性)與策略行為之間的關係。有鑒於過去的研究較多著墨在高階經營團隊的組成背景與組織績效之間的關係,較少探討其與風險追求之間的關係,故本研究將重點探討高階經營團隊的組成背景與公司風險追求之間的關係。本研究的樣本以台灣的電子業為主,分別自公開資訊觀測站取得樣本公司的高階經營團隊背景資料以及台灣經濟新報取得風險追求(研發費用、併購費用、資本支出)的衡量指標。研究發現教育程度與風險追求之間存在顯著性的關係,當公司的碩博士生人數佔高階經營團隊的比例越高,公司風險追求的程度也會越高,而國外經驗亦得出相同的結果,惟專業異質性的部分並未存在顯著性的關係。
    Reference: 1. Becker, M. (1970). Sociometric location and innovativeness: reformulation and extension of the diffusion model. American Sociological Review, 35, 2, 267-304.
    2. Bantel, K. & Jackson, S. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference. Strategy Management Journal, 10, 107-124.
    3. Bloom, M. & Milkovich, G. (1998). Relationships among Risk, Incentive Pay, and Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 3, 293-287.
    4. Beckman, C. & Haunschild, P. (2002). Network learning: the effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 92-124.
    5. Child, J. (1974). Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance. Journal of Management Studies, 11, 13-27.
    6. Channon, D. (1979). Leadership and corporate performance in the service industries. Journal of Management Studies, 16, 185-201.
    7. Chatterjee, A. & Hambrick, D. (2011). Executive Personality, Capability Cues, and Risk Taking: How Narcissistic CEOs React to Their Successes and Stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 202-237.
    8. Chittoor, R. & Aulakh, S. (2015). What Drives Overseas Acquisitions by Indian Firms? A Behavior Risk-Taking Perspective. Management International Review, 55, 255-275.
    9. Dearborn, D. & Simon, H. (1958). Selective perception: A note on the department identification of executives. Sociometry, 21, 140-144.
    10. Dollinger, M. (1984). Environmental Boundary Spanning and Information Processing Effects on Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 2, 351-368.
    11. Daellenbach, U. & Schoenecker, S. (1999). Commitment to innovation: the impact of top management team characteristics. R&D Management, 3, 199-207.
    12. Hoffman, R. & Maier, N. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 27-32.
    13. Hart, P. & Mellons, J. (1970). Management youth and company growth: A correlation? Management Decision, 4(2), 50-53.
    14. Hambrick, D. & Mason, P. (1984). Upper Echelons: The organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 2, 193-206.
    15. Hitt, M. & Tyler, B. (1991). Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 327-352.
    16. Hoskisson, R. & Hitt, A. (1993). Managerial incentives and investment in R&D in large multiproduct firms. Organization Science, 4(2), 325-341.
    17. Hambrick, D. & Chen, M. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firm’s competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659-684.
    18. Haleblian, J. & Devers, E. (2009). Taking Stock of What We Know About Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 35, 3, 469-502.
    19. Kimberly, J. & Evanisko, M. (1981). Organizational innovation: the individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 4, 689-713.
    20. Kish-Gephart, J. & Campbell, J. (2015). You don’t forget your roots: The influence of CEO social class background on strategic risk taking. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 6, 1614-1636.
    21. Lawrence, P. & Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-47.
    22. March, J. & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial Perspective on Risk and Risk Taking. Management Science, 33, 11, 1404-1418.
    23. Michel, J. & Hambrick, D. (1992). Diversification Posture and Top Management Team Characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 1, 9-37.
    24. Pratt, J. (1964). Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large. Econometrica, 32, 122-136.
    25. Perlmutter, H. (1969). The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Columbia Journal of World Business, 9-18.
    26. Rogers, E. & Shoemaker, F. (1971). Communications to Innovations. New York.
    27. Schroder, H. & Winston (1967). Human information processing: individuals and group functioning in complex social situations. New York.
    28. Sambharya, R. (1996). Foreign Experience of Top Management Teams and International Diversification Strategies of U.S. Multinational Corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 9, 739-746.
    29. Sanders, W. & Hambrick, D. (2007). Swing for the Fences: The Effects of CEO Options on Company Risk Taking and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 5, 1055-1078.
    30. Tihanyi, L. & Ellstrand, A. (2000). Composition of the Top Management Team and Firm International Diversification. Journal of Management, 26, 6, 1157-1177.
    31. Thomas, D. (2005). Top Management Team International Dominant Logic: A New Linkage in the International Diversification-Performance Link. Problem and Perspectives in Management, 2, 54-62.

    32. Wiersema, M. & Bantel, K. (1992). Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 1, 91-121.
    33. Wright, P. & Ferris, P. (1996). Impact of Corporate Insider, Blockholder, And Institutional Equity Ownership On Firm Risk Taking. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 2, 441-458.
    34. Welbourne, T. & Cycyota, C. (2007). Wall Street Reaction to Women in IPOs: An Examination of Gender Diversity in Top Management Teams. Group Organization Management, 32, 524-547.
    35. Zhu, D. & Chen, G. (2015). Narcissism, director selection, and risk-taking spending. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 2075-2098.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    103351041
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103351041
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    104101.pdf801KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback