English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25779496      Online Users : 102
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99318


    Title: 仲介員特性與房屋交易時的議價能力之關聯性
    The correlation between characteristics of a real estate agent and power of negotiation
    Authors: 李亞叡
    Lee, Ya Jui
    Contributors: 吳文傑
    Wu, Jack
    李亞叡
    Lee, Ya Jui
    Keywords: 特徵價格理論
    仲介員議價能力
    代理人問題
    hedonic house pricing
    power of negotiation
    agency problem
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-07-20 16:54:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之目的可分為二,第一個是希望探討具有不同特性之仲介員,在交易過程中是否有某些特性對於議價能力有顯著影響。第二個目的,希望探討在不同房屋類型之交易案件中,是否由更為適任之仲介員經手交易,能獲得更好的成果。透過模型設計,將特徵價格模型配合本研究目的加以修改,以實證迴歸分析那些仲介員特性更能夠在交易過程中,展現議價能力使買家提高願付價格(willingness to pay),讓委託人取得更好之賣價,同時也為公司創造更高價值。
    根據實證結果顯示,仲介員性別、年齡對於議價達成率所產生的影響並不顯著,教育水準、年資與血型才是影響議價達成率的關鍵。仲介員教育程度越高議價能力越強,也越能達成委託人所委託之目標。同時本研究也發現年資高之仲介員容易產生代理人問題(agency problem),年資高之仲介員傾向於利用訊息優勢,左右買賣雙方之交易決策,使交易價格降低,不但背離委託人初衷,亦對公司造成負面影響。另一方面,血型為AB型之仲介員在議價能力上的表現最佳,該類仲介員普遍具有好的協商能力、邏輯分析能力,其次是順從、負責的A型仲介員,表現最差的反而是一般認為積極熱情的B型與O型。
    There are two purposes of this article. The first one is to identify the correlation between characteristics of a real estate agent and power of negotiation/bargain. The second one is to find if there are some characteristics of a real estate agent that are more suitable for dealing certain type of housing, including apartment, mansion and high-rise.
    Using the method of hedonic house pricing as a basic model, the article takes a bargain rate as dependent variable instead of housing prices, while characteristics of real estate agents are included in independent variables. It should be noted that higher bargain rate means greater power of negotiation.
    The results of this article are (a) education, blood type are positively significant, (b) seniority is negatively significant, (c) gender, age, astrology are not. It is also found that there are agency problems in housing markets since agents with more seniority are more likely to have poor power of negotiation, which is opposite of our expectations. The study findings may serve as a guide for further research on management and leadership of real estate industries.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    朱明星,2010,「管理者的血型、人格特質與工作績效之關聯性研究」,臺北大學企業管理學系,學位論文。
    何友鋒、吳綱立,1993,「臺中市住宅價格與住宅屬性關係之研究」,《建築學報》,8,59-84。
    李春長、游淑滿、張維倫,2012,「公共設施, 環境品質與不動產景氣對住宅價格影響之研究─兼論不動產景氣之調節效果」,《住宅學報》,21(1),67-68。
    李鴻岳,2010,「房仲業內部服務品質對員工工作滿意度之研究---以臺北市高專為例」,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班,碩士論文。
    林祖嘉、馬毓駿,2007,「特徵方程式大量估價法在臺灣不動產市場之應用」,《住宅學報》,16(2),1-22。
    林祖嘉、林素菁,1993,「臺灣地區環境品質與公共設施對房價與房租影響之分析」,《住宅學報》,1,21-45。
    洪得洋、林祖嘉,1999,「臺北市捷運系統與道路寬度對房屋價格影響之研究」,《住宅學報》,8,47-68。

    高振順,2011,「壽險業務人員績效表現的分析 --以X壽險公司為例」,國立高雄第一科技大學風險管理與保險研究所,碩士論文。
    張仁偉,2003,「血型與人格關係的研究」,中國大陸東華師範大學,碩士論文。
    張漢宜,2011,「血型決定棒次!球團教練、企業老闆為何最愛A型」,《天下雜誌424期》。
    楊宗憲、蘇倖慧,2011,「迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究」,《住宅學報》,20(2),61-80。
    廖桂梅,2009,「業務人員的性別特質對顧客購買決策的影響-以保險櫃銷售員為例」,國立臺中技術學院事業經營研究所,碩士論文。
    鄭力倫,2008,「在不同主管領導風格下業務人員人格特質對業績績效的影響-以事務機器業為例」,國立臺北大學企業管理學系,碩士論文。
    劉連龍,2006,「血型、人格特质与心理健康」,《國際中華應用心理學雜誌》,1,29-31。
    魏子雲,1994,「壽險業務人員個人知覺及人格特質與績效間關係之探討」,中原大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。

    外文文獻
    Barrick, M. R., G. L. Stewart and M. Piotrowski, 2002, “Personality and Job Performance: Test of the Mediating Effects of Motivation among Sales Representatives,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 87:1, 43-51.
    Bartik, T. J. and V. K. Smith, 1987, “Urban Amenities and Public Policy. In: Mills, E.S. (Ed.), Handbook on Urban Economics,” North Holland Publishers, Amsterdam, 1207-1254.
    Beron, K., J. Murdoch and M. Thayer, 2001, “The Benefit of Visibility Improvement: New Evidence from the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22, 319-337.
    Bourassa, S., M. Hoesli and J. Sun, 2005, “The Price of Aesthetic Externalities,” Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13, 2, 165-188.
    Boyle, M. A. and K. A. Kiel, 2001, “A survey of house price hedonic studies of the impact of environmental externalities,” Journal of Real Estate Literature, 9, 117-144.
    Can, A., 1992, “Specification and Estimation of Hedonic Housing Price Models,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22, 453-474.
    Daneshvary, N. and T. Clauretie, 2012, “Agent Change and Seller Bargaining Power: A Case of Principal Agent Problem in the Housing Market,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 47, 416-433.
    Do, A. Q., R. W. Wilbur and J. L. Short, 1994, “An Empirical Examination of the Externalities of Neighborhood Churches on Housing Values,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 9:2, 127-136.
    Gatto, M. and G. A. De Leo, 2000, “Pricing Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: The Never-Ending Story,” Bioscience, 50, 347-355.
    Goldberg, L. R., 1990, “An Alternative "Description of Personality: The Big-Five Factor Structure,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59:6, 1216-1229.
    Goodman, A. C., 1978, “Hedonic Prices, Price Indices and Housing Markets,” Journal of Urban Economics, 5, 471-484.
    Haab, T. C. and K. E. McConnell, 2002, “Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-market Valuation,” Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.
    Harding, J. P., S. S. Rosenthal and C. F. Sirmans, 2003, “Estimating Bargaining Power in the Market for Existing Homes,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85:1, 178-188.
    Harrison, D. and D. Rubinfeld, 1978, “Hedonic Housing Prices and the Demand for Clean Air,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 5, 81-102.
    Hite, D., W. Chern, F. Hitzhusen and A. Randall, 2001, “Property-Value Impacts of an Environmental Disamenity: The Case of Landfills,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22, 2, 185-202.
    Horwitz, J. L., 1992, “The Role of the List Price in Housing Markets: Theory and an Econometric Model,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7, 115-129.
    Hoshino, T. and K. Kuriyama, 2010, “Measuring the Benefits of Neighborhood Park Amenities: Application and Comparison of Spatial Hedonic Approaches,” Environmental and Resource Economics, 45, 429-444.
    Jim, C. Y., 2009, “Value of Scenic Views: Hedonic Assessment of Private Housing in Hong Kong,” Landscape and Urban Planning, 91, 226-236.
    Jud, G. and J. Frew, 1986, “Real Estate Brokers, Housing Prices, and the Demand for Housing,” Urban Studies, 23, 21-31.
    Kagie, M. and M. V. Wezel, 2007, “Hedonic Price Models and Indices Based on Boosting Applied to The Dutch Housing Market,” Intelligent System in Accounting Finance and Management, 15, 85-106.
    Knight, J. R., 2002, “Listing Price, Time on the Market, and Ultimate Selling Price: Causes and Effects of Listing Price Changes,” Real Estate Economics, 20:2, 213-237.
    Leggett, C. G. and N. E. Bockstael, 2000, “Evidence of the Effects of Water Quality on Residential Land Prices,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 121-144.
    Levitt, S. and C. Syverson, 2008, “Market Distortions When Agents Are Better Informed: The Value of Information in Real Estate Transactions,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90:4, 599-611.
    Li, M. M. and H. J. Brown, 1980, “Micro-Neighborhood Externalities and Hedonic Housing Prices,” Land Economics, 56:2, 125-141.
    Rosen, S., 1974, “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition,” Journal of Political Economy, 82:1, 34-55.
    Rutherford, R. C., T. M. Springer and A. Yavas, 2005, “Conflicts between Principals and Agents: Evidence from Residential Brokerage,” Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 627-665.
    Sheppard, S., 1999, “Hedonic Analysis of Housing Markets,” Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 3, 1595-1635.
    Singell, L. D. and J. H. Lillydahl, 1990, “An Empirical Examination of the Effect of Impact Fees on the Housing Market,” Land Economics, 66:1, 82-92.
    Tyrvainen, L., 1997, “The Amenity Value of the Urban Forest: An Application of the Hedonic Pricing Method,” Landscape and Urban Planning, 37:3-4, 211-222.
    Tyrvainen, L. and A. Miettinen, 2000, “Property Prices and Urban Forest Amenities,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 205-223.
    Webster’s New International Dictionary 1925.
    Yavas, A. and S. X. Yang, 1995, “The strategic role of listing price in marketing real estate: Theory and evidence,” Real Estate Economics, 23:3, 347-368.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    103255002
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103255002
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    500201.pdf1106KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback