English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46107278      Online Users : 1357
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99445


    Title: 個人特質對接受職務調整意願之影響
    The Impacts of Individual Characteristics on People’s Willingness to Accept Job Rotations.
    Authors: 洪美秋
    Hung, Mei Chiou
    Contributors: 董祥開
    Dong, Hsiang Kai
    洪美秋
    Hung, Mei Chiou
    Keywords: 接受改變意願
    風險偏好
    官僚人格
    公共服務動機
    行政區劃
    職務輪調制度
    理性行為理論
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-07-21 10:40:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來政府機關為提升行政效能與國家競爭力,積極運用「職務輪調制度」及「組織改造」以精簡組織人力,迫使人員改變既有熟識環境及伙伴關係,致提高其離職意願;然個人日常生活、工作態度與工作動機等行為表現均受到個人特質所影響,且面對風險之決策行為亦與個人心理預期有絕對關係;故個人風險傾向、官僚人格特質與公共服務動機差異會影響個人在工作上行為,也會影響個人職業選擇及生涯規劃。
    本研究係以民國100年新北市政府民政局委託中國地方自治學會辦理新北市行政區劃調整規劃案為個案,而以依變項接受改變意願為主軸,分別對影響行為意願之「個人因素」及「組織因素」等自變項進行探討,以了解行政區劃調整是否因個人風險傾向、官僚人格特質、公共服務動機及預期職務調整效益等變項考量,影響接受職務調整之意願,進而轉換其職業行為模式。
    本研究係以新北市各區公所主管人員為研究對象,對所有對象發放問卷,共發出268份問卷;採用敘述性統計進行個人基本統計變項分析,及運用卡方檢定、t檢定、變異數分析、相關性分析及迴歸分析等推論性統計進行差異性與關聯性分析,進而提出下列研究發現:一、區公所主管人員個人風險偏好以風險趨避者居多,且其接受職務調整意願影響之程度受到行政區域調整規劃案干擾;二、具保守者官僚人格特質之區公所主管人員較不接受職務調整意願,兩者具負向因果關係;三、區公所主管人員公共服務動機有逐漸削弱趨勢,致與職務調整接受意願無顯著因果關係;四、區公所主管人員對職務調整之預期效益會影響接受職務調整意願,兩者具正向因果關係;五、區公所主管人員接受職務調整意願頗高,且偏愛以各區公所間輪調安排模式。最後,提出建議予政府當局施政之參考,期使執行行政區劃機關提升政策實行效益。
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    中國地方自治學會(2012)。新北市行政區域調整委外研究規劃案。新北市政府民政局委託研究報告(編號:100806916),未出版。
    王俊元(2014)。強化公共服務動機之可行策略。T&D飛訊,197,1-32。
    史美強(譯)(1997)。官僚經驗:對現代組織方式之批評(Ralph P. Hummel原著)。臺北市:五南。
    考試院(2010)。建立公務人員職務輪調制度之研究,104年11月26日取自考試院,網址:http://www.exam.gov.tw/cp.asp?xItem=4217&ctNode=720&mp=1。
    宋明哲(2001)。現代風險管理(五版)。臺北市:五南。
    宋明哲(2010)。風險管理:非金融風險(四版)。臺北市:五南。
    余明助(2006)。組織變革不確定感與員工工作態度關係之研究-以組織溝通和員工信任為中介變數。人力資源管理學報6(2),89-110。
    何國強(1994)。當代中國地方政府。廣州:廣東高等教育出版社。
    吳定、鄭勝分、李盈盈(2005)。組織發展應用技術。臺北市:智勝文化。
    吳宗憲、黃浩瑋(2014)。促參承辦人工作動機和團隊關係對其工作態度的影響研究。行政暨政策學報,58,87-120。
    吳秉恩(1993)。組織行為學。臺北市:華泰書局。
    吳靖東(2009)。個別投資人風險偏好程度與股票交易行為:以模擬交易為例。創新與管理 ,6(2),21 – 37。
    紀俊臣(2011)。臺灣五直轄市行政區劃與地方治理。中國地方自治,64(5),4-22。
    涂金堂(2012)。量表編製與SPSS(初版)。臺北市:五南。
    夏道維(2007)。公部門人員知識分享行為之初探。人文社會學報,3,73-120。
    張永承、陳瑾儀(2015)。人格特質對於產品推薦機制之影響。中原企管評論,13(1), 1-25。
    張其祿(2015)。公共服務動機概念操作與應用之研究紀要。中國行政評論,21(1),1-14。
    張景盛、戴士欽、石英鈴(2008)。臨床護理人員工作輪調與工作滿意對組織承諾影響之探討。醫護科技學刊,10(1),15-26。
    黃同圳(2008)。人力資源管理:全球思維本土觀點(八版)。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。
    黃先鋒、廖敏齡、周澤民(2005)。工作輪調、工作滿足與組織承諾相關性之實證研究。人力資源管理學報,5 (4),107-129。
    黃俊英、林震岩(1997)。SAS精析與實例。臺北市:華泰書局。
    黃家齊(譯)(2011)。組織行為學(十三版)(Stephen P. Robbins & Timothy A. Judge原著)。臺北市:華泰書局。
    黃朝盟(1999)。公務人員職務輪調制度之影響評估。行政暨政策學報,1,185-218。
    曾冠球(2004)。基層官僚人員裁量行為之初探:以台北市區公所組織為例。行政暨政策學報,38,95-140。
    曾冠球、黃偉誠(2011)。公共管理者對於公私合夥風險的認知:調查與反思。公共行政學報,41,1-36。
    曾紀壽、賴緁瑩(2012)。大學生美國打工旅遊參與動機對參與意願影響之研究。知識經濟學報,9(1),25-41。
    馮佩君、林裕益(2014)。強制扣薪之警察人員風險偏好之研究。中央警察大學警察行政管理學報,10,221-242。
    新北市政府民政局(2016)。新北市人口統計,105年2月16日取自新北市政府民政局,網址:http://www.ca.ntpc.gov.tw/Population/List?wnd_id=68。
    詹中原(2006)。組織變革之因應,憲政(研)095-048號,104年11月20日取自國策研究報告,網址:http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/CL/095/CL-R-095-048.htm。
    廖永靜(2008)。論行政組織的創新能力。研習論壇月刋,88,1-9。
    陳衍宏(2011)。迎向「新公共服務(NPS)」的具體實踐。研習論壇月刋,125,25-36。
    陳朝建(2010)。縣(市)改制對「區」的行政區劃之衝擊與因應。中國地方自治,63(9),18-38。
    陳敦源(2002)。民主與官僚:新制度論的觀點(初版)。臺北縣:韋伯文化。
    潘瑛如、李隆盛(2014)。中文版公共服務動機量表之信效度驗證。測驗學刊,61(1),135-158。
    潘瑛如、李隆盛(2015)。初薦任公務人員公共服務動機及其前因之探究。文官制度季刊,7(1),35-69。
    劉君德(1996)。中國行政區劃的理論與實踐。上海:華東師範學院出版社。
    薄占宇(2010)。中共地方政府行政區劃變革之探討:一個中央與地方關係的新視角。中國行政評論,18(1),69-126。
    謝秋山、陳世香(2015)。國外公共服務動機研究:起源、發現與局限性。上海行政學院學報,2015 (1),70 -78。
    謝茵如、周文玲、梁榮輝(2010)。會計人員工作輪替與角色壓力之關係研究。全球管理與經濟,6 (2),19-36。
    蔡明華(2011)。公務人員人格發展與公共服務。文官制度季刊,3(1),93-115
    魏定仁(1991)。憲法學。北京:北京大學出版社。
    簡淑華、廖翠紅(2008)。全權委託業務中人格特質、風險偏好對投資決策之影響。國立臺中技術學院學報,9(1),91-108。
    蘇文賢、江吟梓(譯)(2010)。基層官僚:公職人員的困境(Michael Lipsky原著)。臺北市:學富文化。 
    二、英文文獻
    Anil, A., & Brian, M., (2004), Using Job Rotation to Extract Employee Information, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 20 ( 2), 400-414.
    Anderson, J., Milkovich, G., & Tsui, A. (1981), A Model of Intra-Organization Mobility, The Academy of Management Review, 6 (4), 529-538.
    Ajzen, I , (1991), The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
    Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding Attitude & Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Black, J., & Gregersen, H. (2008), It starts with one, Philadelphia: Wharton School Press.
    Brewer, G.A., & Maranto, R.A. (2000), Comparing the Roles of Political Appointees and Career Executives in the U.S. Federal Executive Branch, American Review of Public Administration, 30 (1), 69-86.
    Bright, L. (2007), Does person-organization fit mediate the relationship between public service motivation and the job performance of public employees? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27 (4), 361-379.
    Bruinsma, G. (2010), If there’s a will, there’s a way: Determinants of willingness to change at the UMCG, Vos University of Groningen Msc BA Master Thesis Change Management.
    Buchanan, B. (1975), Red-tape and the service ethic, Administration & Society, 6(4),423-444.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics, NLSY79, Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/nls/y79summary. htm.
    Burnes, B. (2005), Complexity theories and organizational change, International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 73–90.
    Campion, M. A., Cheraskin, L., & Stevens, M. J. (1994), Career-Related Antecedents and Outcomes of Job Rotation, Academy of Management Journal, 37 ( 6), 1518-1542.
    Cacioppe, R. & Mock, P. (1984), A Comparison of the Quality of Work Experience in Government and Private Organizations, Human Relations, 37, 923-940.
    Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2003), The new public service: An approach to reform, International Review of Public Administration, 8(1), 3-10.
    Dong, H. K. D. (2014), Individual Risk Preference and Sector Choice: Are Risk-Averse Individuals More Likely to Choose Careers in the Public Sector? Administration & Society,1-22.(SSCI)
    Downs, A. (1967), Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
    Eriksson, T. & Ortega, J. (2006), The Adoption of Job Rotation: Testing the Theories, Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 59 (4), 653–666.
    Frederickson, H. G., & Hart, D. K. (1985), The public service and the patriotism of benevolence, Public Administration Review, 45 (5), 547-553.
    Ferreira, M., & Armagan, S.(2011), Using social networks theory as a complementary perspective to the study of organizational change, Brazilian Administration Review, 8(2), 168-184.
    Greenhalgh, L. & Rosenblatt, Z. (1984), Job insecurity: Toward conceptual clarity, Academy of Management Review, 9, 438-448.
    Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1976), Motivation Through the Design of Work:Test of a Theory, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,16 , 250-279.
    Herscovitch, L. & Meyer, J.P.( 2002), Commitment to organizational change: extension of a three-component model, The Journal of applied psychology, 87( 3), 474-487.
    Jang, C-L (2012), The Effect of Personality Traits on Public Service Motivation: Evidence from Taiwan, Social Behavior and Personality, 40 (5), 725-734. (SSCI).
    Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002), Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (4), 797-807.
    Kaplan, S. & Garrick, B. J. (1981), On The Quantitative Definition of Risk, Risk Analysis, 1 (1) ,11–27. 
    Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979), Prospect theory: Ananalysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
    Kelman, S. (1987), Public choice and public spirit, The Public Interest, 87 (1), 80-94.
    Kilpatrick, F. P., Cummings, M. C., & Jennings, M. K. (1964), Reviews of Books and Documents: Image and Reality in the Public Service, Public Administration Review , 24(2), 113-119.
    Kim, D. C. (1992), Risk preferences in participative budgeting, The Accounting Review, 67, 303-318.
    Kim, S. (2009), Testing the structure of public service motivation in Korea: A research note, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 839-851
    Knoke, D., & Wright-Isak, C. (1982), Individual motives and organizational incentive systems, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1 (2), 209-254.
    Korunka, C., Scharitzer, D., Sainfort, F. & Carayon, P.(2003) , Employee strain and job satisfaction related to an implementation of quality in a public service organization: A longitudinal study, Work and Stress, 17 (1), 52-72.
    Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001), Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle, Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429-451.
    Machin, M. A., Fogarty, G. J., & Bannon, S. F (2009), Predicting employees` commitment to and support for organisational change, The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Organisational Psychology, 2 (1), 10-18.
    Messmer, M. (1992), Cross-Discipline Training: A Strategic Method to Do More with Less, Management Review, 81 (5), 26-28.
    Metselaar, E. E. (1997), Assessing the willingness to change: construction and validation of the DINAMO, Aalsmeer: VU huisdrukkerij.
    Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2007), The Role of Organizations in Fostering Public Service Motivation, Public Administration Review, 67 (1), 40-53. 
    Perry, J. L. (1996), Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6 (1), 5-22.
    Perry, J. L. (2000), Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10 (2), 471-488.
    Perry, J. L., & Porter, L. W. (1982), Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations, The Academy of Management Review, 7 (1), 89-98.
    Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990), The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50 (3), 367-373.
    Piderit, S. K. (2000), Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes toward an Organizational Change, The Academy of Management Review, 25 (4), 783-794.
    Rainey, H. G. (1982), Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. The American Review of Public Administration, 16(4), 288-302.
    Rainey, H. G.(1983), Public Agencies and Private Firms: Incentive Structure, Goals, and Individual Roles, Administration and Society, 15, 207-242.
    Robbins, S. P., (1991), Organization Theory, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
    Steijn, B. (2008), Person-environment fit and public service motivation, International Public Management Journal, 11 (1), 13-27.
    Stoffers, J. & Mordant-Dols, A.(2015), Transformational Leadership and Professionals Willingness to Change: A Multiple Case Study in Project Management Organisations, Human Resource Management Research, 5 (2), 40-46.
    Tucker, R. B. (2001). Innovation: The new corecompetency, Strategy and Leadership, 29 (1), 11-14.
    Vandenabeele, W. (2008), Government calling: public service motivation as an element in selecting government as an employer of choice, Public Administration, 86 (4), 1089-1105. 
    Weber, M. (1946), From Max Weber: essays in sociology, New York: Oxford University Press.
    Worley, C.G. & Feyerherm, A.E. (2003), Reflections on the Future of Organization Development, The Journal of Appied Behavioral Science, 39(l), 97-115.
    Zajonc, R. B., Wolosin, R. J., Wolosin, M. A. & Sherman, S. J. (1968), Individual and group risk-taking in a two-choice situation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 4(1), 89-106.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    103921042
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103921042
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    104201.pdf3470KbAdobe PDF2537View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback