政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99591
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109951/140892 (78%)
造访人次 : 46196118      在线人数 : 886
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/99591


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99591


    题名: 康德法權論在其道德哲學中之定位
    The Status of Kant’s Rechtslehre in His Moral Philosophy
    作者: 王冠龍
    Wang, Kuan Lung
    贡献者: 林遠澤
    Lin, Yuan Tse
    王冠龍
    Wang, Kuan Lung
    关键词: 康德
    法權論
    道德形上學
    實踐哲學
    Kant
    Doctrine of Right
    Metaphysics of Morals
    Practical Philosophy
    日期: 2016
    上传时间: 2016-08-02 17:53:12 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 做為康德道德哲學最後一本主要的著作，《道德底形上學》一書長期以來一直受到康德研究者們的忽視。許多論者們認為，〈法權論〉做為《道德底形上學》一書中的第一部份，其中的許多觀點與康德道德哲學中的理念並不一致。然而，在本論文中，筆者即試圖捍衛〈法權論〉的道德地位，以及《道德底形上學》一書的重要性。是故，本論文有兩個主要的論點：第一，康德的〈法權論〉並不會與其道德哲學理念產生衝突，相對的，法權的法則必須由定言令式演繹而來，而法權的系統本身也未違反自律的原則；第二，《道德底形上學》一書扮演了「道德義務學」及「道德實踐學」的角色，從而與《道德底形上學之基礎》及《實踐理性批判》共同構成康德道德哲學系統中不可或缺的重要部份。
    As the last major work of Kant’s morality, the Metaphysics of Morals has long been neglected in Kantian literatures. Many Scholars argue that the Rechtslehre, or Doctrine of Right, as the first part of Metaphysics of Morals, is not consistent with Kant’s moral theory. This research intends to defend the moral status of Rechtslehre and the importance of Metaphysics of Morals in Kant’s moral philosophy. There are two main arguments - firstly, Rechtslehre does not conflict with Kant’s moral theory; instead, the laws of Right should be derived from categorical imperative, and the system of Right does not contradict to the principle of autonomy. Secondly, the Metaphysics of Morals can be regarded as the “doctrine of moral duties” and the “doctrine of practical morality”, and, together with the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals and the Critique of Practical Reason, constitutes an essential part in Kant’s moral philosophy.
    參考文獻: 壹、 中文部份
    Kant, Immanuel著，李明輝譯，《道德底形上學之基礎》，台北：聯經出版社，1990年。
    ———，《一切能作為學問而出現的未來形上學之序論》，台北：聯經出版社，2008年。
    ———，《康德歷史哲學論文集》，台北：聯經出版社，2013年。
    ———，《道德底形上學》，台北：聯經出版社，2015年。
    Kant, Immanuel著，鄧曉芒譯，楊祖陶校訂，《純粹理性批判》，台北：聯經，2004年。
    ———，《實踐理性批判》，台北：聯經，2004年。
    貳、 英文部份
    Allison, H. E. Kant`s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
    Anderson, P. S., and J. Bell. Kant and Theology. New York: T&T Clark International, 2010.
    Browne, S. S. S. "Right Acts and Moral Actions." The Journal of Philosophy 42 (1945): 505-515.
    Cassirer, Ernst. Kant`s Life and Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.
    Feinberg, Joel. "Voluntary Euthanasia and the Inalienable Right to Life." Philosophy and Public Affairs 7, no. 2 (1978): 93-123.
    Flikschuh, Katrin. "Kant`s Indemonstrable Postulate of Right: A Response to Paul Guyer." Kantian Review 12 (2007): 1-39.
    ———. "Justice without Virtue." In Kant`s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, ed. by Lara Denis, 51-70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
    Gregor, Mary J. "Laws of Freedom: A Study of Kant`s Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik Der Sitten." The Philosophical Review 65 (1963): 223.
    Guyer, Paul. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
    ———. "Kant`s Deductions of the Principles of Right." In Kant`s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, ed. by Mark Timmons, 23-64. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
    Höffe, Otfried. "Kant’s Principle of Justice as Categorical Imperative of Law." In Kant’s Practical Philosophy Reconsidered, ed. by Yirmiyahu Yovel, 149-167. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
    ———. Immanuel Kant. State University of New York Press, 1994.
    Hardwig, John. "Action from Duty but Not in Accord with Duty." Ethics 93 (1983): 283-290.
    Kant, Immanuel. Philosophical Correspondence, 1759-99. ed. and trans. by Arnulf Zweig. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
    ———. On History. ed. and trans. by Lewis White Beck. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing, 1977.
    ———. "Perpetual Peace, and Other Essays on Politics, History, and Morals." Trans. by Ted Humphrey. 162. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co., 1983.
    ———. Kant: Political Writings. Trans. by H. S. Nisbet. ed. by Hans Reiss Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
    ———. The Metaphysics of Morals. ed. and trans. by Mary Greory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
    ———. Critique of Practical Reason. ed. and trans. by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
    ———. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
    ———. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections from the Critique of Pure Reason. ed. and trans. by Gary C. Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
    ———. Religion and Rational Theology. ed. by Allen Wood and George Di Giovanni Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
    ———. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. ed. and trans. by Mary Gregor and Jens Timmermann. Revised Edition ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
    Kuehn, Manfred. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
    ———. "Kant`s Metaphysics of Morals: The History and Significance of Its Deferral." In Kant`s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, ed. by Lara Denis, 9-27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
    Mulholland, Leslie A. Kant`s System of Rights. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
    Murphy, Jeffrie G. Kant: The Philosophy of Right. New York: St. Martin`s Press, 1970.
    Nance, Michael. "Discussion Kantian Right and the Categorical Imperative: Response to Willaschek." International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2012): 541-556.
    Paton, H J. The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant`s Moral Philosophy. Chicago: University of Pennsylvania Press, Incorporated, 1971.
    Potter, Nelson. "Applying the Categorical Imperative in Kant`s Rechtslehre." Jahrbuch fuer Recht und Ethik 11 (2003): 37-51.
    Riley, Patrick. Kant`s Political Philosophy. Totowa, N.J: Rowman and Littlefield, 1983.
    Ripstein, Arthur. "Kant on Law and Justice." In The Blackwell Guide to Kant`s Ethics, ed. by Jr. Thomas E. Hill, 159-178. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
    ———. "A Postulate Incapable of Further Proof." In Force and Freedom: Kant`s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.
    ———. "Kant and the Circumstances of Justice." In Kant`s Political Theory: Interpretations and Applications, ed. by Elisabeth Ellis, 42-73: Penn State University Press, 2012.
    Seel, Gerhard. "How Does Kant Justify the Universal Objective Validity of the Law of Right?". International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2009): 71-94.
    Taylor, Robert S. "Kant`s Political Religion: The Transparency of Perpetual Peace and the Highest Good." The Review of Politics 72 (2010): 1.
    Wellman, Carl. Real Rights. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
    Wellman, Christopher Heath. "On Conflicts between Rights." Law and philosophy 14, no. 3 (1995): 271-295.
    Willaschek, Marcus. "Why the Doctrine of Right Does Not Belong in the Metaphysics of Morals." Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 5 (1997): 205-227.
    ———. "Which Imperatives for Right? On the Non-Prescriptive Character of Juridical Laws." In Kant`s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, ed. by Mark Timmons, 65-88. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
    ———. "Right and Coercion: Can Kant`s Conception of Right Be Derived from His Moral Theory?". International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2009): 49-70.
    ———. "The Non-Derivability of Kantian Right from the Categorical Imperative: A Response to Nance." International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2012): 557-564.
    Williams, Howard. Essays on Kant`s Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
    Wood, Allen. Kant`s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
    ———. "Kant’s Doctrine of Right: Introduction." In Immanuel Kant. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe Der Rechtslehre., ed. by O. Höffe, 19-40. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1999.
    ———. "The Final Form of Kant`s Practical Philosophy." In Kant`s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, ed. by Mark Timmons, 1-21. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
    ———. Kantian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
    ———. Kant`s Moral Religion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    哲學系
    101154003
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101154003
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[哲學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    400301.pdf1698KbAdobe PDF21071检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈