政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99627
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49589391      Online Users : 632
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99627


    Title: 面臨颱洪災害下家戶風險溝通與調適行為之研究
    A Study of Flood Disaster Risk Communication and Adaptive Behavior for Household
    Authors: 陳郁筠
    Contributors: 白仁德
    陳郁筠
    Keywords: 颱洪災害
    風險溝通
    調適行為
    結構方程模式
    多項式羅吉斯迴歸
    risk communication
    adaptive behavior
    structural equation modeling
    multinomial logistic regression
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-08-03 10:21:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著氣候變遷與溫室效應影響日益明顯，台灣近年發生極端強降雨颱風的次數越來越頻繁，更造成流域地區嚴重災情，而從莫拉克風災經驗可體會到家戶風險溝通的重要性，也意識到我國實務與學術上相關研究的缺乏，故本研究探討家戶風險溝通機制中各項重要因素與調適行為間的關係，以及找出影響家戶調適行為決策之關鍵因素，進而提出家戶風險溝通策略之改善建議，以促進家戶採取調適行為。
    本研究經由文獻回顧建立家戶調適行為之風險溝通概念架構，依循此架構研擬問卷，以高屏溪流域地區家戶為研究對象進行問卷調查，透過結構方程模式(SEM)驗證風險溝通架構，了解風險溝通機制各項因素與影響調適行為各因素之關係，後以面對災害回應之強烈將調適行為積極程度分為「消極或低度積極」、「中度積極」與「高度積極」，運用多項式羅吉斯迴歸模型建立家戶應變措施決策模型與調適措施決策模型，找出影響家戶調適行為決策之關鍵因素。
    研究結果顯示，調適行為受到內在認知的影響，而內在認知同時受風險溝通機制與外在環境之影響，就風險溝通機制而言，親友鄰居、村里長與地方政府等社區網絡為重要管道。影響調適行為之關鍵因素以災害認知為主，其次為調適行為認知，居住村里次之，其中災害認知與調適行為認知越高，越有可能採取較積極之調適行為，此外，由於自然社會環境、風險溝通特性與社會經濟背景等因素交互影響下，各村里在調適行為決策上也有所差異。最後依據實證結果，與水患自主防災社區風險溝通現況，提出改善家戶風險溝通之策略建議，期望增進風險溝通機制的完備與促進家戶採取調適行為，以減緩極端氣候造成的衝擊。
    Along with the intensification of global climate change and greenhouse effect, typhoons with extreme rainfall strike Taiwan more and more frequently, which cause severe disasters in watershed area. From the experience of Typhoon Morakot in 2009, we realized the importance of risk communication with households and also the lack of related academic research. As a result, this study aims to discuss important factors in risk communication mechanism and their relationships with adaptive behaviors. It also find out key factors influencing decision-making of adaptive behaviors.
    Based on literature review, this study build a conceptual framework of risk communication process to describe how to trigger adaptive behaviors and encourage adaptive behaviors with risk communication. This study send out questionnaires to the households in Kaoping River Watershed and use structural equation modeling(SEM) to verify the conceptual framework. Then according to attitude of positive degree, adaptive behaviors are classified into“passive or low”,“medium” and “high” levels. By multinomial logistic regression, an empirical analysis was performed to analyze the key factors influencing decision-making of adaptive behaviors.
    The results show that adaptive behaviors are affected by internal cognition and at the same time internal cognition are affected by risk communication mechanism and external environment. As for risk communication mechanism, family, friends, neighbors and local governments are crucial communication channel. Key factors influencing decision-making of adaptive behaviors are cognition of disaster and adaptive behavior. People with higher cognition of disaster and adaptive behavior would more likely to take positive adaptive behaviors. Besides, community they lived in is also a key factor. Because the interaction of environments, risk communication patterns and socioeconomic attributes, people from different communities would take different adaptive behaviors. Based on empirical results, this study propose suggestions of risk communication strategies in order to better the risk communication mechanism and encourage households to take adaptive behaviors.
    Reference: 中文參考文獻
    王韋超，2013，「影響個體水災調適行為因素之研究」，臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所學位論文，1-98。
    吳宜蓁，盧鴻毅 、 侯心雅，2009，「樂觀偏誤及預防行為: 台灣民眾對禽流感的反應」，『臺灣公共衛生雜誌』，28(6)，505-516。
    李維芹，2012，「颱洪災害預警系統與居民調適行為之研究-以宜蘭縣蘇澳鎮六里為例」，臺北大學都市計劃研究所學位論文，1-134。
    李馥潔，2011，「災害資訊與社區防災意識關聯性之研究－以南投市社區為例」，長榮大學土地管理與開發學系（所）學位論文，1-135。
    余桂霖，2011，『結構方程式模型分析』，台北:五南。
    林宏立，2010，「以結構方程模式探討台灣地區堰塞湖災害預警與居民認知影響避難決策之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
    林冠慧，2010，「全球變遷下脆弱性與適應性研究方法與方法論的探討」，『全球變遷通訊雜誌』，43，33-38。
    林韋秀、廖學誠，2005，「汐止地區店家的洪患災害識覺及調適行為之研究」. 『Journal of Chinese Soil and Water Conservation』，36(4)，413-427。
    林水波、李長晏，2005，『跨域治理』，台北:五南。
    周嘉盈，2011，「影響民眾採取水災整備行為的因素」，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
    袁國寧，2007，「現代社會風險倫理之探析－台灣颱風、洪水災害風險管理觀點」，『亞太經濟管理評論』，10(2)，47-78。
    洪鴻智、盧禹廷，2015，「沿海居民的氣候變遷與颱洪災害調適」，『都市與計劃』，48(1)，87-108。
    馬彥彬、李長晏，2014，《強化地方政府災害防救效能之研究》，國家發展委員會委託研究報告書。
    胡幼偉，2004，「政府風險溝通研究—以農委會和衛生署因應禽流感風險為例」。
    張長義，1977，「環境識覺與自然災害之研究」，『中國地理學會會刊』，(5)，57-60。
    張偉豪、鄭時宜，2012，『與結構方程模型共舞』，新北市:前程。
    許天生，2009，「颱風災害風險判斷與災害防備之硏究:以澎湖地區為例」。
    許晃雄、陳正達、盧孟明、陳永明、周佳、吳宜昭等，2011，「臺灣氣候變遷科學報告2011」，行政院國家科學委員會。
    曹建宇、張長義，2008，「地震災害經驗與調適行為之比較研究-以台南縣白河，台中縣東勢居民為例」，『華岡地理學報』，(21)，52-75。
    黃榮村、林舒予、邱耀初、郭鎧紋、江嘉豪，2008，〈地震社會易損性與有效資訊內容傳播方式之探討:以不同類型民眾與社區為對象〉，《中央氣象局地震技術報告彙編》。
    黃榮村、陳寬政，1993，「嘉南地區整合性預警系統之需求特徵、風險知覺與防災經驗調查(二) 」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
    黃芳銘，2004，『社會科學統計方法學─結構方程模式』，台北:五南。
    黃芳銘，2011，『結構方程模式: 理論與應用』，台北:五南。
    曾薏珊，2011，「H1N1 新型流感報導中憤怨恐慌的要素與風險解釋」，國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    辜勁智2011，「風險報導與公眾認知研究:以情境理論檢視超級細菌ndm-1為例」，世新大學公共關係暨廣告學研究所碩士論文。
    楊雲龍，1997，「蘭陽平原水災災害識覺之研究」，『新竹師院學報』，10，287-323。
    廖楷民、鄧傳忠、李香潔、陳淑惠2013。『天然災害風險溝通指南』，國家災害防救科技中心技術報告（編號:NCDR 101-T16）。
    魯開元，2004，「汐止水患對居民的災害識覺及其調適行為之探討」，國立東華大學自然資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    郭彥廉、林彥伶、蕭代基，2010，「台灣民眾地震減災整備行為研究」，98年度強化災害防救科技研發與落實運作方案成果研討會，國家災害防救科技中心，台北，5月5日。
    郭彥廉、廖楷民，2010，「利用網路進行風險溝通與其成效評估─以災害防救電子報為例」，『資訊科學應用期刊』，6(1):29-38。
    郭彥廉，2013，「災害經驗與風險資訊對家戶減災整備及風險暴露行為之影響研究(II)」。
    陳宜彣，2014，「好茶村民災害識覺與莫拉克颱風災後新生活調適之研究」，國立高雄師範大學地理學系碩士論文。
    盧禹廷，2011，「應用社會資本探討社區居民的氣候變遷調適行為-以東港林邊佳冬為例」，臺北大學都市計劃研究所學位論文，1-114。
    蔡麗玉，1993，「地盤下陷地區居民的環境識覺與調適:以口湖、東石為例」，國立臺灣師範大學地理學系碩士論文。
    經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所，2011，強化高屏溪流域因應氣候變遷防洪調適能力研究計畫。
    高雄市政府消防局，2010，『強化高高屏防救災計畫』。
    外文參考文獻
    Adger, W. N., Brooks, N., Bentham, G., Agnew, M., & Eriksen, S, 2004, “New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity”, Norwich: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research 122.
    Alaszewski, A., 2005, “Risk communication: Identifying the importance of social context”, Health, Risk & Society, 7(2):101-105.
    Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y., 1988, “On the evaluation of structural equation models.” Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1):74-94.
    Benjamin, S. L., & Belluck, D. A. , 1990, “Risk feedback: an important step in risk communication. ” Journal (American Water Works Association), 50-55.
    Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R., 1993, “Alternative ways of assessing model fit.” Sage focus editions, 154:136-136.
    Bočkarjova, M., van der Veen, A., & Geurts, P. A. T. M. ,2009, “Flood disaster in the Netherlands: a trade-off between paying for protection and undertaking action? ”, In Proceeding of the 56th NARSC meetings, San-Francisco, America.
    Byrne, B. M., 1994, Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
    Burton, I., Kates, R. W., White, G. F., 1993, The Environmental as Hazard(2ded.), New York: the Guilford press.
    Covello, V. T., Slovic, P., & von Winterfeldt, D., 1986, “Risk communication - A review of the literature”, Risk Abstracts 3:171-181.
    Covello,V.T. & F.W. Allen, 1988, “Seven cardinal rules of risk communication. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency”, Office of Policy Analysis.
    Covello, V. T, & Sandman, P. M., 2001, “Risk communication: evolution and revolution”, Solutions to an Environment in Peril: 164-178.
    Deanne K. Bird, Gudrun Gisladottir, Dale Dominey-Howes, 2010, “Volcanic risk and tourism in southern Iceland: Implications for hazard, risk and emergency response education and training”, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 189:33–48
    Duval, T. S., & Mulilis, J. P., 1999, “A Person‐Relative‐to‐Event (PrE) Approach to Negative Threat Appeals and Earthquake Preparedness: A Field Study1”, Journal of applied social psychology 29(3):495-516.
    Drabek, T. E., & Boggs, K. S., 1968, “Families in disaster: Reactions and relatives”, Journal of Marriage and the Family: 443-451.
    Driscoll, P., & Salwen, M. B., 1996, “Riding out the storm: Public evaluations of news coverage of Hurricane Andrew”, International journal of mass emergencies and disasters 14(3):293-303.
    Edwards, M. L., 1993, “Social Location and Self-Protective Behavior: Implications for Earthquake Preparedness”, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 77:293-304.
    Engle, N. L., 2011, “Adaptive capacity and its assessment”, Global Environmental Change 21(2):647-656.
    Fang, D., Fang, C. L., Tsai, B. K., Lan, L. C., & Hsu, W. S. , 2012, “Relationships among trust in messages, risk perception, and risk reduction preferences based upon avian influenza in Taiwan”, International journal of environmental research and public health 9(8) : 2742-2757.
    Fiorino, D. J., 1990, “Citizens participation and environmental risk: a survey of instructional mechanisim”, Science, Technology, and Human Values. 15: 226-243.
    Frewer, L., 2004, “The public and effective risk communication”, Toxicology letters, 149(1): 391-397.
    Garson, G. D., 2012, Testing statistical assumptions, Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishing
    Griffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S., & Neuwirth, K., 1999, “Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors”, Environmental research 80(2): 230-S245.
    Gurabardhi, Z., Gutteling, J. M., & Kuttschreuter, M., 2004, “The Development of Risk Communication: An Empirical Analysis of the Literature in the Field”, Science Communication 25(4): 323-349.
    Grothmann, T., & Patt, A., 2005, “Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change”, Global Environmental Change 15(3): 199-213.
    Hilgartner, S., 1990, “The dominant view of popularisation: conceptual problems, political uses”, Social Stud. Sci.20: 519–539.
    Hillson, D., & Murray-Webster, R., 2007, Understanding and managing risk attitude, Gower Publishing.
    Höppner, C., Buchecker, M., & Bründl, M., 2010, Risk communication and natural hazards, CapHaz project. Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
    Jason Beringer, 2000, “Community fire safety at the urban/rural interface: The bushfire risk”, Fire Safety Journal 35(1): 1-23.
    Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D., 1989, LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Spss
    Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D, 1996, LISREL 8: User`s Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc Chicago: Scientific Software International, 4, 43.
    O`Riordan, T., Jungermann, H., Kasperson, R. E., & Wiedemann, P. M., 1989, “Themes and tasks of risk communication: Report of an International Conference held at KFA Jülich.” Risk Analysis, 9(4), 513-518.
    Poussin, J. K., Botzen, W. W., & Aerts, J. C, 2014, Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households. Environmental Science & Policy, 40, 69-77.
    Kasperson, R.E., 1986, “Six propositions on public participation and their relevance for risk communication”, Risk Analysis 6: 275-381.
    Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R.,... & Ratick, S.,1988, “The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework”, Risk Analysis 8(2): 177-187
    Kasperson, R. E., & Stallen, P. J. M, 1991, Communicating risks to the public: International perspectives, Springer Science & Business Media.
    Kline, R. B., 1998, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, NY: Guilford Press
    Lundgren, R. E., & McMakin, A. H., 2013, Risk communication: A handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks, John Wiley & Sons.
    Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. , 1993, Risk area residents’ changing perceptions of volcano hazard at Mt. St. Helens. In Prediction and perception of natural hazards, pp. 159-166, Springer Netherlands.
    Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W., 2003, Communicating environmental risk in multiethnic communities (7), Sage Publications.
    Lindell, M. K., Lu, J. C., & Prater, C. S., 2005, “Household decision making and evacuation in response to Hurricane Lili”, Natural Hazards Review 6(4): 171-179
    Leiss, W., 1996, “Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 545 (1): 85-94.
    Wilkins, L., & Patterson, P, 1987, “Risk analysis and the construction of news”, Journal of Communication 37(3): 80-92.
    McCarthy, J. J. et al., 2001, Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, Vulnerability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
    McComas, K. A, 2006, “Defining moments in risk communication research: 1996–2005”, Journal of health communication 11(1): 75-91.
    Morrow, B. H., 2009, “Risk behavior and risk communication: Synthesis and expert interviews”, Final Report for the NOAA Coastal Services Center 53.
    Nunnally, J.C., 1978, Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill
    Otway, H., 1987, “Expert risk communication and democracy”, Risk Analysis 7 (2): 125–129.
    Paton, D., 2003, “Disaster preparedness: a social-cognitive perspective”, Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 12(3): 210-216.
    Renn, O., 1992, “Risk communication: Towards a rational discourse with the public”, Journal of hazardous materials 29(3): 465-519.
    Rohrmann, B., 1992, “The evaluation of risk communication effectiveness”, Acta psychologica 81(2): 169-192.
    Rohrmann, B., 2000, “A socio-psychological model for analyzing risk communication processes”, The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies
    Rohrmann, B., 2002, Risk attitude scales: Concepts and questionnaires, Melbourne: University of Melbourne, 12
    Ronan, K. R., & Johnston, D. M, 2001, “Correlates of hazard education programs for youth”, Risk Analysis 21(6): 1055-1064.
    Rogers, G. O, 1997, “The dynamics of risk perception: How does perceived risk respond to risk events?” Risk Analysis 17(6): 745-757.
    Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L., 1981, “Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research”, American Journal of Sociology 89(4): 986-988
    Rogers, R. W., Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R., 1983, “Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation”, Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook : 153-177.
    Rowan, K. E., 1994, “The technical and democratic approaches to risk situations: Their appeal, limitations, and rhetorical alternative”, Argumentation 8(4): 391-409.
    Sandman, P. M., 1989, “Hazard versus outrage in the public perception of risk”, Effective risk communication 4: 45-49.
    Sheppard, B. Janoske, M., & Liu, B., 2012, Understanding Risk Communication Theory: A Guide for Emergency Managers and Communicators, START, National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, University of Maryland.
    Smit, B., & Wandel, J., 2006, “Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability”, Global environmental change 16(3): 282-292.
    Seyal, A., Rahman, M., & Rahim, M., 2002, Determinants of Academic Use of the Internet: A Structural Equation Model. Behavior and Information Technology, 21(1), 71–86
    Scott. J. E., 1994, The Measurement of Information Systems Effectiveness: Evaluating a Measuring Instrument. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information System, Vancouver, 111-128.
    Tigere, D., 2013, An evaluation of flood risk communication efforts based upon the values judgements of the inhabitants of a selection of informal settlements in the Cape Town municipal area, Department of Environmental and occupational studies, Cape Peninsula University of Science and Technology, Cape Town, South Africa.
    Tompkins, E. L., & Eakin, H., 2012, “Managing private and public adaptation to climate change”, Global environmental change22 (1): 3-11.
    Takao, K., 2003, “Factors Determining Disaster Preparedness in Residents: Differences in Terms of Homeownership and Age”, Kawasaki journal of medical welfare 9(1): 21-29.
    Tobin, G. A., & Montz, B. E., 1997, The impacts of a second catastrophic flood on property values in Linda and Olivehurst, California. Natural Hazards Research and Applications Center, University of Colorado, Boulder.
    Wang, X. H., & Kapucu, N., 2007, “Public complacency under repeated emergency threats: some empirical evidence”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(1): 57-78.
    Waterstone, M., 1978, Hazard mitigation behavior of urban flood plain residents, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
    Woolgar, S., 1996, “Psychology, qualitative methods and the ideas of science”, Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences: 11–24.
    Zhu, D., X. Xie, et al., 2011, “Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception”, Journal of Environmental Psychology 31(2): 129-36.
    網路參考文獻
    Daly, D., Jodieri, R., McCarthy, S., Pygott, K., & Wright, M., 2015, “Communication and engagement techniques in local flood risk management” (Date visited: May 15, 2016) http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/15220/1/CIRIAreportC752.pdf
    Firus, K., Fleischhauer, M., Greiving, S., Grifoni, P., & Stickler, T, 2011, “Planning and implementing communication and public participation processes in flood risk management-Procedural guidelines and toolbox of methods.” (Date visited: May 11, 2016) http://www.partizipation.at/fileadmin/media_data/Downloads/Zukunftsdiskurse-Studien/imra_handbook.pdf
    水患自主防災社區資訊系統，2015，取用時間2015年11月23日
    http://140.112.76.195/CVD
    國家災害防救科技中心災害潛勢地圖網站，2015，取用時間2015年11月23日 http://satis.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/Dmap/gis/default.aspx
    廖楷民、鄧傳忠，2012，如何瞭解風險溝通對象─以水災備災行為為例
    http://www.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/upload/epaper/081.pdf
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    103257012
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103257012
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Land Economics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    701201.pdf5682KbAdobe PDF280View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback