English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88295/117812 (75%)
Visitors : 23403167      Online Users : 274
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99904


    Title: IRT真實分數等化於群體不變性假設之探究-以TASA 2007英語文題組測驗為例
    Other Titles: Investigating the Population Invariance Assumption of Item Response Theory True Score Equating Across Gender Groups for Forms of a Testlet-Based the Taiwan Assessment of Student Achievement
    Authors: 王暄博;郭伯臣;呂玉如
    Keywords: IRT真實分數等化方法;群體不變性;臺灣學生學習成就評量資料庫;題組反應理論模式
    item response theory true score equating;population invariance;Taiwan Assessment of Student Achievement;testlet response theory
    Date: 2013-03
    Issue Date: 2016-08-09 16:06:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 群體不變性是指不同次群體的測驗分數,經過相同的等化程序後,其轉換後之量尺分數應該相同。因此,為了要滿足測驗公平性的原則,等化在進行時必須符合群體不變性之需求(Kolen & Brennan, 2004)。近年來,許多研究皆在檢驗大型測驗進行量尺化程序後是否仍符合群體不變性的性質,例如:Yang與Gao(2008)透過IRT真實分數等化方法檢驗CLEP題組測驗的量尺分數是否符合群體不變性。此外,由於Yang與Gao使用Rasch測量模式估計題組測驗,而非使用題組反應理論模式。因此,本研究將以2007年臺灣學生學習成就評量資料庫英語文題組測驗資料為例,檢驗測驗資料是否滿足等化群體不變性的性質,並探究使用不同測量模式的等化效果。
    In this study, population invariance refers to treating the test scores of different subgroups. Following identical equalization processes, the scaled scores after transformation should be the same. Thus, to ensure the fairness of tests, equalization must adhere to the demands of population invariance (Kolen & Brennan, 2004). In recent years, numerous studies have examined whether tests meet population invariance demands after scaling is performed. For example, Yang and Gao (2008) examined whether scaled CLEP scores using item response theory true score equating method conformed to the principles of population invariance. However, they employed the Rasc model to estimate the testlets rather than using testlet response theory. Therefore, this study uses the English test score data from the 2007 Taiwan Assessment of Student Achievement (TASA) as an example, investigating population invariance after equalization, and examining the effects of using different measurement models.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 36(1),117-146
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102498852013033601005
    DOI: 10.3966/102498852013033601005
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    36(1)-117-146.pdf7541KbAdobe PDF457View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback