English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25751008      Online Users : 169
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99966


    Title: The Words-and-Rules Theory: Evidence from Chinese Morphology
    Other Titles: 漢語述賓式合成複合詞對詞項與規則理論的映証
    Authors: 何元建
    He, Yuan-Jian
    Date: 2004-12
    Issue Date: 2016-08-11 10:36:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 帶施事題元的漢語述賓式合成複合詞有兩種:OVS型和VOS型。前者是純粹的向心型詞結構,而後者卻不是如此。在VOS型當中,如果V和O分別是單音節的,那麽VO是VP經模式聯體記憶而轉化過來的詞根,跟S再組成複合詞。如果V和O分別是雙音節的,那麽VO是VP直接進入複合詞,即所謂“短語入詞”現象。模式聯體記憶和運用規則之間的相互補充反映了語法運作的經濟原則。漢、英兩種語言中的合成複合詞都為這一原則提供了證據。不同的是,漢語合成複合詞中的施事題元是一個粘著詞根,而英語合成複合詞中的施事題元卻可以是一個動詞後綴。這樣,漢語合成複合詞在成分結構中直接就滿足了“題元指派統一論”的要求,而英語合成複合詞(如果施事題元是一個動詞後綴的話)就需要在邏輯形式中去完成相同的要求。
    Chinese OVChinese OVS compounds are generated by morphological rules, whereas VOS compounds are far less homogenous. The VO part is a root word if the V and O are monosyllabic, or a VP if the V and/or O are disyllabic. In the former case, the syllable count may have conditioned a pattern-associated memory that has transformed a VP into a root. In the latter case a lexico-syntactic compound has been created. These findings are in agreement with the principle of memory vs. symbol-processing proposed by Pinker (1999) and provide proof that the principle works in more areas than inflectional morphology and may indeed be universal.S compounds are generated by morphological rules, whereas VOS compounds are far less homogenous. The VO part is a root word if the V and O are monosyllabic, or a VP if the V and/or O are disyllabic. In the former case, the syllable count may have conditioned a pattern-associated memory that has transformed a VP into a root. In the latter case a lexico-syntactic compound has been created. These findings are in agreement with the principle of memory vs. symbol-processing proposed by Pinker (1999) and provide proof that the principle works in more areas than inflectional morphology and may indeed be universal.
    Relation: 臺灣語言學期刊, 2(2), 1-26
    Taiwan Journal of Linguistics
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6519/TJL.2004.2(2).1
    DOI: 10.6519/TJL.2004.2(2).1
    Appears in Collections:[台灣語言學期刊 THCI Core ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    2(2)-1-26.pdf913KbAdobe PDF262View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback