English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111316/142225 (78%)
Visitors : 48382565      Online Users : 692
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/102067


    Title: 法庭錄音的公開及其限制－司法獨立、司法課責與隱私保護
    Other Titles: Public Access to Audio Court Recordings and Its Limits—Judicial Independence, Judicial Accountability, and the Protection of Individual Privacy
    Authors: 劉定基
    LIU, Chien-Chi
    Contributors: 法律系
    Date: 2015-10
    Issue Date: 2016-09-20 13:27:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 二○一三年底修正公布的「法庭錄音及其利用保存辦法」引發資訊隱私權與訴訟權保障間的衝突。二○一五年中，法院組織法的修正，雖然解決部分問題，但卻未能突破法庭錄音僅對訴訟相關當事人公開的限制。本文從上述爭議出發，希望釐清法庭錄音公開的目的除輔助筆錄製作外，是否還有維護司法獨立及司法課責的意義，並深入分析法庭錄音公開所涉及的資訊隱私權爭議，嘗試參考美國經驗及臺灣實務見解，就如何取得法庭錄音公開與相關當事人隱私利益的平衡，提出建議，俾供未來修法參考。
    The Promulgation of the Regulations on the Use and Storage of Audio Court Recordings in 2013 has sparked a debate between the protection of information privacy and the right to litigation. Although the amendment of the Court Organization Act in 2015 partially solved this problem, the bigger issue regarding the access to court recordings by the general public was left unanswered. First, this article seeks to clarify the purpose of access to audio court recordings; it asks that in addition to assisting the preparation of court records, do audio court recordings also serve other functions, such as preserving judicial independence and accountability? Furthermore, this paper will also analyze the potential information privacy issues resulting from public access to court recordings. By analyzing U.S. practices and taking into account of Taiwans existing judicial opinions, this article aims to provide concrete suggestions on how to balance public interests of greater access to court recordings versus the potential harms to individual privacy that might result from such access.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, No.245, 149-167
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102559312015100245009
    DOI: 10.3966/102559312015100245009
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2516View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback