English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46285678      Online Users : 781
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/109132
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/109132


    Title: 揮別俾斯麥模式社會保險制度? 從德國聯邦憲法法院幾則判決評析 德國近二十年健保制度改革方向
    Other Titles: Far from Bismarckian Social Insurance? -An Observation of Twenty Years of German Healthcare Reforms with a Review of the Relevant Decisions of the German Federal Constitutional Court
    Authors: 孫迺翊
    Sun, Nai-Yi
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 德國法定健康保險;健保改革;競爭;附加保費;共同自治
    German statutory health care insurance;health care reform;competition;supplementary premium;joint selfgovernment
    Date: 2016-09
    Issue Date: 2017-04-24 10:23:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 德國法定健康保險制度近二十年來歷經多次重大改革,現行制度已不同於以往以保障受薪階級為主、採多元複數之社會自治組織形式、強調階級認同與社會互助等圖像,取而代之者為全民強制保險配合商業保險社會法化、導入保險人間競爭機制、聯邦層級組織單一化、一般保費費率單一化搭配附加保費由各保險人再自主決定等制度特徵。本文就此詳加介紹,並探討上述改革措施引發的憲法疑義,包括商業保險締約自由之限制、競爭機制是否弱化社會互助及醫療服務指令民主正當性不足等問題。最後,再就德國與臺灣健保制度所面臨的憲法爭議進行簡要分析。
    German statutory health care insurance (Die gesetzliche Krankenversicherung) has undergone important changes over the last twenty years. Today its framework is fairly different from the traditional Bismarckian model, which is characterized by identity and solidarity among employees and management manifested in plural self-governmental bodies. The current health care system is constructed by the following means: legal instruments, including the obligation for all citizens to be insured by public or private insurers, with free choice of public insurers-the sickness funds (Krankenkasse) for insured persons which leads to more competition among sickness funds; centralization of the plural federal self-governmental and joint self-governmental bodies; introduction of a uniform contribution rate for all sickness funds connected with supplementary premiums for individual one. This article will provide an overview of paradigmatic changes of the German health care reform over the last twenty years, and of the relevant legal issues, including the constitutionality of compulsory insurance accompanied by legal modifications of private health care insurance contracts, the consistency of competition mechanisms in the social insurance scheme with the constitutional principle of social welfare state, and the democratic legitimacy deficit of the medicinal directives issued by the Federal Joint Committee (gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss). Finally this article will conduct a comparative analysis of the constitutional debates over Taiwan`s National Health Insurance and its 2011 reforms in light of the different legal frameworks and the social, economic and political challenges of each system.
    Relation: 歐美研究, 46(3), 373-442
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    373-442.pdf1569KbAdobe PDF2394View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback