English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25743163      Online Users : 250
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/109300


    Title: 論民事上歧視禁止規定的證立可能性
    Other Titles: On the Justification of the Civil Antidiscrimination Program
    Authors: 周伯峰
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: 民事上歧視禁止規定;私法自治;契約自由;平等對待;Civil Antidiscrimination Program;Private Autonomy
    Date: 2016-12
    Issue Date: 2017-05-02 19:07:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文的主要目的在於探討民事上歧視禁止規定在現代民法體系中可否證立的問題,也就是說民事上歧視禁止規定對於建立在私法自治與契約自由之上的現代民法來說是否是一個無法相容的異物?認為民事上歧視禁止規定是無法證立的理由主要有二:其一,因其主要目的在於實現分配正義,而分配正義的實現並不是現代民法的任務;其二,這樣的規定是混淆法律與道德的界限,是一種強迫性道德的法律化。而本文則試著指出,分配正義的實現也是民法的任務之一,而且民事上歧視禁止規定的明文化也沒有混淆法律與道德的問題。民事上歧視禁止規定其實意味著一種以平等限制自由來確保自由的想法,而這是現代民法或契約法的發展趨勢或未來。This study aims to discuss whether the civil antidiscrimination program is justifiable in the contemporary civil legal system. In other words, is the civil antidiscrimination program incompatible with the contemporary civil legal system—a system established in the principle of private autonomy and contract freedom? Some believe that the said program cannot be justified due to the following two reasons: 1. While the goal of the program is to realize distributive justice, such aim is not within the domain of contemporary civil law. 2. The program is unable to distinguish law from moral. In this study, it is argued that one of principal missions which contemporary civil law aims to complete is to achieve distributive justice. Furthermore, the alleged inability to distinguish law from moral is both nonexistent and ungrounded. The very essence of civil antidiscrimination program is that to achieve justified freedom, it is necessary to impose certain restrictions based on the concept of equality. Such program is consistent with the development trend of the modern civil law.
    Relation: 政大法學評論, No.147, pp.159-202
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102398202016120147003
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202016120147003
    Appears in Collections:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文
    [法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML403View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback