 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 111316/142225 (78%)
Visitors : 48379778
Online Users : 909
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/109678
|
| Title: | 論刑事訴訟之權利濫用禁止原則 |
| Authors: | 何賴傑 |
| Contributors: | 法律系 |
| Keywords: | 刑事妥速審判法;誠信原則;權利濫用禁止原則
Criminal Speedy Trial Code;principle of good faith;prohibition of the abuse of rights |
| Date: | 2016 |
| Issue Date: | 2017-05-17 15:12:51 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 刑事妥速審判法第3條規定：「當事人、代理人、辯護人及其他參與訴訟程序而為訴訟行為者，應依誠信原則，行使訴訟程序上之權利，不得濫用，亦不得無故拖延。」依立法理由所示，此係援引日本刑事訴訟規則第1條第2項「訴訟上之權利應誠實行使，不得濫用」規定。依我國法院適用刑事妥速審判法應行注意事項第3點規定所示，速審法第3條係以權利行使不得以損害其他訴訟行為人之利益或延滯訴訟程序為主要目的。依此，似乎是以誠信原則作為本條之規範意旨。但本文認為，於刑事訴訟法並無誠信原則適用餘地，本條是權利濫用禁止原則之明文。相對於我國情形，德國雖然花了將近一世紀時間在討論刑事訴訟之權利濫用問題，但最終仍沒有予以明文，只有於刑事訴訟法有部分零星修法而已，因為德國學說對權利濫用禁止原則之明文化仍有諸多疑慮與爭議。本文嘗試以德國學說及實務之討論資料，作為我國刑事妥速審判法第3條之適用參考。
Article 3 of the Criminal Speedy Trial Code provides that:“The parties, agents, defenders and other persons involved in the proceedings shall exercise the rights in the proceedings in accordance with the principle of good faith and not abuse or cause undue delay.“ As shown in the legislative reasons, this is a reference to the Japanese Criminal Procedure Rules, Article 1, paragraph 2, “the right in the proceedings should be exercised honestly, not
abuse“. According to the provision 3 of the Notice on the Application of the Criminal Speedy Trial Code, the main purpose of Article 3 of the Criminal Speedy Trial Code is
that, the rights in the proceedings shall be exercised not to harm the interests of the other litigants or to delay the proceedings. Therefore, it seems that the principle of good faith is the normative intention of this article. However, my opinion is that, there is no room for the
principle of good faith in this Article, this Article is for the prohibition of the abuse of rights. Compared with the situation above mentioned, although Germany spent nearly a century in the discussion of this theme, but ultimately did not expressly, only in the Criminal
Procedure Code hat some sporadic amendments, because there are still many doubts and controversies. This project attempts to discuss the German doctrine and practice as reference to the Article 3 of the Criminal Speedy Trial Code. |
| Relation: | MOST 104-2410-H-004-055 |
| Data Type: | report |
| Appears in Collections: | [法律學系] 國科會研究計畫
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 104-2410-H-004-055.pdf | | 8906Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 618 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
