政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/110787
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 97142/127787 (76%)
Visitors : 33378906      Online Users : 455
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110787

    Title: 禮讓參選的賽局分析
    A game-theoretic analysis of making a concession decision of election
    Authors: 嚴馥妤
    Yan, Fu Yu
    Contributors: 王智賢
    Wang, Jue Shyan
    Yan, Fu Yu
    Keywords: 禮讓參選
    Concession election
    Party integration
    Sequential equilibrium
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-07-11 11:26:45 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 臺灣的政黨候選人在選舉競選過程中時常發生政治禮讓參選的狀況,相關新聞報導政黨整合同黨內或是政治理念較接近的不同政黨,可凝聚較多力量來提升選舉的勝選機率。本文引進參選人可以在他方參選人參選時,選擇是否採取禮讓決策的賽局模型來分析禮讓參選決策的合理性,而在參選人一方不知道他方參選人實力的強弱情況下,我們發現強者型態的他方參選人比例較大、他方參選人給予較多的禮讓好處時,使參選人較容易啟動禮讓機制。
    In Taiwan, there is a common phenomenon that the candidates of the party give in to other candidates in the election campaigns. The relevant news reports a political party can integrate with the same party or different political parties with closer political ideas. By integrating, a political party can gather more political power to enhance the winning probability of election. This paper establishes a model of game theory which candidates can choose whether to make a concession decision of election when other party candidates are running for the election. This model is used to analyze the rationality of making a concession decision of election. In the case of candidates who do not know the capability of other party candidate, the candidates are easier to start the concession mechanism when the proportion of strong type of other candidates is larger and the other party candidates give more concessional benefits.
    Reference: 王宏恩 ( 2015 ),「政黨標籤的規模效應-以2014年村里長選舉為例」,選舉研究, 22:1,109-141。
    王智賢 ( 2007 ),「勸退參選的賽局分析」,經濟研究,43:2,149-180。
    王智賢、曾姵華 ( 2008 ),「勸退參選的賽局分析-政黨利益模型」,經社法治論叢,42,193-227。
    王鼎銘 ( 2011 ),「參選人競選支出效果及其外部性:單記非讓渡投票制下之黨內競爭性分析」,人文及社會科學集刊,23:3,341-370。
    田弘華、劉義周 ( 2005 ),「 政黨合作與杜瓦傑法則:連宋配、國親合的賽局分析 」,臺灣政治學刊,9:1,3 -37。
    林水波 ( 2010 ),「 政治弔詭及其管理--以發展第三勢力為例」,政策研究學報,10,1-18。
    林長志 ( 2009 ),「立委選制變遷對選民投票行為之影響---投票穩定與變遷的分析」,國立政治大學政治學系博士論文。
    崔曉倩、吳重禮 ( 2007 ),「政黨與未獲提名候選人之參選決策分析」,選舉研究,14:1,119-143。
    黃紀,劉義周與蕭怡靖 ( 2009 ),「單一選區兩票制下台灣選民的投票行為,2008年立法委員選舉的多層分析」,國立政治大學政治學系博士論文。
    羅月英 ( 2005 ),「 政黨聯盟的經驗—兼論國民黨、親民黨之政黨整合 」,私立中國文化大學政治學系研究所碩士論文。
    Aldrich, J. H. 2011. Why Parties? : A Second Look, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Aylott, N. and N. Bolin (2017), “Managed Intra-Party Democracy: Precursory Delegation and Party Leader Selection.” Party Politics, 23:1, 55-65.
    Balliet, D., J. M. Tybur, J. Wu, C. Antonellis and P. A. M. Van Lange (2016), “Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-Group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, forthcoming.
    Best, R. E. and S. B. Lem (2010), “Electoral Volatility, Competition and Third-Party Candidacies in US Gubernatorial Elections.” Party Politics, 17:5, 611-628.
    Cassino, D., C. S. Taber and M. Lodge (2007), “Information Processing and Public Opinion.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 48:2, 205-220.
    Jensen, C. and J. P. F. Thomsen (2011), “Can Party Competition Amplify Mass Ideological Polarization over Public Policy? The Case of Ethnic Exclusionism in Denmark and Sweden.” Party Politics, 19:5, 821-840.
    Kreps, D. and R. Wilson (1982), “Sequential Equilibrium.” Econometrica, 50, 863-894.
    Riker, W. H. (1982), “The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” The American Political Science Review,76:4, 753-766.
    Somer-Topcu, Z. (2017), “Agree or Disagree: How do Party Leader Changes Affect the Distribution of Voters’ Perceptions.” Party Politics, 23:1, 66-75.
    Description: 碩士
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103255008
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Public Finance] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    500801.pdf883KbAdobe PDF202View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback