政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/110931
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140901 (78%)
Visitors : 46060537      Online Users : 1107
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110931


    Title: 從技藝與機運的對立關係來看公共領域中的政治自由—鄂蘭與海德格的比較
    Other Titles: On Political Freedom in Public Sphere in View of the Contrast between Téchne and Túche - A Comparison between Arendt and Heidegger
    Authors: 汪文聖
    Wang, Wen-Sheng
    Contributors: 哲學系
    Keywords: 技藝;機運;公共領域;漢娜鄂蘭;馬丁海德格
    Téchne;Túche;Public Sphere;Hannah Arendt;Martin Heidegger
    Date: 2017-02
    Issue Date: 2017-07-12 10:17:43 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 此文始於討論亞里斯多德理解政治為一種技藝，及其界定的技藝對反於機運。故政治學既非精確的科學，也非偶發的意見，它可稱為一種技藝之學，政治是以人為活動來面對機運的公共事務。其次本文探討漢娜．鄂蘭如何理解公共領域中的政治自由為多數公民的意志，以面對一個機運的、但可被化解的不確定未來。本文接著對馬丁．海德格基於「此－在」的意志與從「存有」的本有而來的思想，以理解公共領域中的政治自由，並詮釋政治對於海德格而言是如何面對機運的。最後我們可做介於鄂蘭與海德格之間的一個比較。
    This paper begins with a discussion of the thesis that politics is a kind of téchne (art), as Aristotle states. He defines téchne to be the opposite of túche (chance). Hence, politics is neither an exact science nor an accidental opinion. It is, rather, a teachable art or skill (Kunstlehre). Politics is a public affair in the sense of human activity facing túche. Based on this theme, the paper investigates how Hannah Arendt interprets political freedom in public sphere as the will of the plural citizens, facing an uncertain future, which can be interpreted as túche, in an attempt to still the disquiet of the collective ego. We further investigate Heidegger`s understanding of political freedom in public sphere based on his comprehension of the will of Da-sein and the enowning (Ereignis) of Being. Hence we can also interpret how politics is for Heidegger to face túche. With this regard, a comparison between Arendt and Heidegger could be made.
    Relation: 東吳哲學學報, 35, 1-30
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Philosophy] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1-30.pdf1195KbAdobe PDF2495View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback