政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/111313
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111253/142169 (78%)
Visitors : 48150112      Online Users : 45
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of Finance > Theses >  Item 140.119/111313


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111313


    Title: 機構投資人交易頻率與主併公司購併宣告效果之關聯
    The trading frequency of institutional investors and M&A announcement returns
    Authors: 李佳諺
    Contributors: 吳啟銘
    李佳諺
    Keywords: 購併
    機構投資人
    M&A
    Institutional investor
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-07-24 12:00:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 全球產業以及經濟局勢瞬息萬變，不斷的出現各種破壞式創新的產品與商業模式，也因此企業積極的尋求購併擴張的機會，以達到永續經營和極大化股東財富的目的。而近年來機構投資人在台灣證券市場扮演著重要的腳色，因此本文將探討機構投資人的持股穩定度與購併宣告效果之關聯。
    本論文以機構投資人(外資、投信、自營商)對主併公司的持股比例穩定度為依據，分類為被長期與短期機構投資人持有之主併公司，並以台灣市場2003年起至2016年底，排除掉金融相關產業的購併案件為研究樣本，探討機構投資人是否對主併公司發揮監督效果，同時觀察長短期機構投資人是否對主併公司之公司特性以及購併交易案之交易特性有無偏好。
    本文研究結果指出，不論在三日、五日或是七日的事件窗口之下，長期機構投資人所持有之主併公司的累積異常報酬都顯著大於被短期機構投資人所持有之主併公司，顯示長期機構投資人確實對主併公司發揮了監督功能。而被長期機構投資人持有之成長型公司獲得的累積異常報酬顯著優於被短期機構投資人所持有之成長型公司。亦發現短期機構投資人偏好能夠明顯提升主併公司盈餘的購併案件。
    This study investigates the relationship between institutional ownership stability and the announcement effect of merger and acquisition, instead of the proportion of institutional ownership, which is very common in last few years. This research is based on acquiring firm listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange which announced merger and acquisition between 2003 and 2016. We classify the sample into two groups according to the standard deviation of the proportion of institutional ownership. The first group is the acquiring firm owned by long-term institutional investor, which means the standard deviation of the acquiring firm in group one is relatively small. By contrast, the second group is the acquiring firms owned by short-term institutional investor. First, we found the long-term institutional investor demonstrated the ability to monitor the acquiring firm because the first group’s CAR is significantly higher than the second group. Second, the growth stock owned by long-term institutional investors also has a significantly higher CAR than the growth stock owned by short-term institutional investor. Third, we also found that the short-term institutional investors prefer the merger and acquisition cases which can increase the net income of the acquiring firm.
    Reference: Almazan et al., 2005. Active Institutional Shareholders and Costs of Monitoring: Evidence from Executive Compensation. Financial Management, December, p. 5–34.
    Anup Agrawa et al., 1992. The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly. The Journal of Finance, 9, pp. 1605-1621.
    Badrinath, Kale et al., 1995. Of Shepherds, Sheep, and the Cross-autocorrelations in Equity Returns. The Review of Financial Studies, pp. 401-430.
    Bhide, A., 1994. Efficient markets deficient governance: US securities regulations protect investors and enhance market liquidity, but do they alienate managers and shareholders?. Harvard Business Review, pp. 128-140.
    Boulton et al., 2014. DOES EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION MAKE CEOS MORE ACQUISITIVE?. Journal of Financial Research, 2 September, pp. 267-294.
    Brickley et al., 1988. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, January–March, pp. 267-291.
    Bushee, 1998. The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior. The Accounting Review, pp. 305-333.
    Bushee, 2001. Do Institutional Investors Prefer Near-Term Earnings over Long-Run Value?. Contemporary Accounting Research, June, pp. 207-246.
    Cai and Vijh, 2007. Incentive Effects of Stock and Option Holdings of Target and Acquirer CEOs. The Journal of Finance, 12 August, pp. 1891-1933.
    Callen and Fang, 2013. Institutional investor stability and crash risk: Monitoring versus short-termism?. Journal of Banking & Finance, August, p. 3047–3063.
    Capron and Shen, 2007. Acquisitions of private vs. public firms: Private information, target selection, and acquirer returns. Strategic Management Journal, April, p. 891–911.
    Capron and Shen, 2007. Acquisitions of private vs. public firms: Private information, target selection, and acquirer returns. Strategic Management Journal, April, pp. 891-911.
    Carow, Heron, and Saxton, 2004. Do early birds get the returns? An empirical investigation of early-mover advantages in acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 23 April, pp. 563-585.
    Chen, Harford and Li, 2007. Monitoring: Which institutions matter?. Journal of Financial Economics, November, pp. 279-305.
    Cheung, K. Y., 2009. The Effects of Merger and Acquisition Announcements on the Security Prices of Bidding Firms and Target Firms in Asia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, August, pp. 274-283.
    Chi et al., 2011. Performance and characteristics of acquiring firms in the Chinese stock markets. Emerging Markets Review, June, pp. 152-170.
    Cole and Vu, 2007. Do Mergers Create or Destroy Value? Evidence from Unsuccessful Mergers. Working paper, University of DePaul, August.
    Conn et al., 2005. The Impact on UK Acquirers of Domestic, Cross-border, Public and Private Acquisitions. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 8 June, pp. 815-870.
    Dobrzynski, 1993. Relationship investing. Business Week, March, pp. 68-75.
    Elkinawy and Offenberg, 2012. Accelerated Vesting in Takeovers: The Impact on Shareholder Wealth. Financial Management, 31 October, pp. 101-126.
    Elyasiani et al., 2010. Institutional ownership stability and the cost of debt. Journal of Financial Markets, November, pp. 475-500.
    Erickson and Wang, 1999. Earnings management by acquiring firms in stock for stock mergers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, April, p. 149–176.
    Gasper et al., 2005. Shareholder investment horizons and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics, April, pp. 135-165.
    Gerald R. Jensen et al., 1997. New Evidence on Size and Price-to-Book Effects in Stock Returns. Financial Analysts Journal, pp. 34-42.
    Grossman and Hart, 1980. Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation. The Bell Journal of Economics, pp. 42-64.
    Hsu and Wang, 2014. The level and stability of institutional ownership and firm performance: Evidence from Taiwan. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, March, pp. 159-173.
    Huang et al., 2016. Method of payment and risk mitigation in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, October, p. 216–234.
    Humphery-Jennera and Powell, 2014. Firm size, sovereign governance, and value creation: Evidence from the acquirer size effect. Journal of Corporate Finance, June, p. 57–77.
    Ivanova, M. R., 2017. Institutional investors as stewards of the corporation: Exploring the challenges to the monitoring hypothesis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 3 February, pp. 175-188.
    Jarrell and Poulsen, 1989. The Returns to Acquiring Firms in Tender Offers: Evidence from Three Decades. Financial Management, Autumn, pp. 12-19.
    Jay C. Hartzell et al., 2003. Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation. The Journal of Finance, 7 November, pp. 2351-2374.
    Kahn and Winton, 1998. Ownership Structure, Speculation, and Shareholder Intervention. The Journal of Finance, February , pp. 99-129.
    Koeplin et al., 2000. The private company discount. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, January, p. 94–101.
    Loderer and Martin, 1990. Corporate Acquisitions by Listed Firms: The Experience of a Comprehensive Sample. Financial Management, Winter, pp. 17-33.
    Loughran and Vijh, 1997. Do Long-Term Shareholders Benefit From Corporate Acquisitions?. The Journal of Finance, December, p. 1765–1790.
    Lskavyan and Spatareanu, 2011. Shareholder protection, ownership concentration and FDI. Journal of Economics and Business, January–February, pp. 69-85.
    Marco Pagnozzi and Antonio Rosato, 2016. Entry by takeover: Auctions vs. bilateral negotiations. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1, pp. 68-84.
    MARTIN, 1996. The Method of Payment in Corporate Acquisitions, Investment Opportunities, and Management Ownership. The Journal of Finance, September, p. 1227–1246.
    Matthew Rhodes–Kropf et al., 2005. Valuation waves and merger activity: The empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, pp. 561-603.
    McConnell et al., 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, October, pp. 595-612.
    Mehrani et al., 2017. Institutional Ownership Type and Earnings Quality: Evidence from Iran. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2 August, pp. 54-73.
    Moeller et al., 2004. Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, August, pp. 201-228.
    Moeller, S.B. et al., 2005. Wealth Destruction on a Massive Scale? A Study of Acquiring-Firm Returns in the Recent Merger Wave. The Journal of Finance, 2 March, pp. 757-782.
    Monks and Minow, 1995. Corporate Governance. Blackwell. Cambridge, MA..
    Parrino, Sias et al., 2003. Voting with their feet: institutional ownership changes around forced CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, April, pp. 3-46.
    Peterson, 1989. Event Studies: A Review of Issues and Methodology. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, January, pp. 36-66.
    Puspa Muniandy et al., 2016. Institutional investors in Australia: Do they play a homogenous monitoring role?. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, December , pp. 266-288.
    Switzer and Wang, 2017. Institutional investment horizon, the information environment, and firm credit risk. Journal of Financial Stability, April, pp. 57-71.
    Szewczyk , Tsetsekos et al., 1992. Institutional Ownership and the Liquidity of Common Stock Offerings. Financial Review, pp. 211-225.
    Travols, 1987. Corporate Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment, and Bidding Firms` Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, September, pp. 943-963.
    Vasilescu and Millo, 2016. Do industrial and geographic diversifications have different effects on earnings management? Evidence from UK mergers and acquisitions. International Review of Financial Analysis, July, p. 33–45.
    Vinay T. Datara et al., 1998. Liquidity and stock returns: An alternative test. Journal of Financial Markets, pp. 203-219.
    丁憲浩, 2008. 關於公司理財的討論：首次公開發行與企業併購. 國立成功大學企業管理學系碩博士班.
    何秉珊, 2009. 從機構投資人持股變動檢驗主併公司併購後績效表現之相關性. 國立中正大學財務金融所碩士論文.
    呂佳玲,林基煌, 2008. 家族企業公司治理、併購策略與績效之探討. 亞太經濟管理評論, pp. P107 - 134.
    李麗虹, 2011. 機構投資人持股變化與主併公司績效之研究. 國立臺灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文.
    洪宏達, 2003. 購併活動對主併公司經營績效之影響—以臺灣上市公司為例. 國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文.
    洪麗惠, 1995. 購併宣告對股東財富的影響：Jensen閒餘現金流量與Tobin`sQ兩假說之驗證. 私立東吳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文.
    孫梅瑞, 2000. 國內上市公司從事公司購併活動對經營績效影響之研究. 國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文.
    惠珉, 2014. 機構投資人交易與主併公司購併宣告效果之關聯. 國立政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文.
    黃惠蓉, 2016. 股價淨值比率應用於投資策略之研究：以台灣上市（櫃）公司為例. 私立南華大學財務金融學系財務管理碩士班.
    鄭至宏, 1995. 從內部化理論與代理理論探討臺灣企業併購活動之股價效果. 私立輔仁大學管理科學研究所碩士論文.
    蕭惠元, 1996. 購併活動對股價行為與會計資訊之影響--以上市公司為例. 私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文.
    謝東益, 2016. 機構投資人持股穩定度與企業併購決策與績效. 國立暨南國際大學財務金融學系碩士論文.
    蘇倬漢, 2010. 台灣地區上市公司購併宣告對股東財富影響之研究. 國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理研究所
    104357021
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104357021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Finance] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    702101.pdf992KbAdobe PDF244View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback