English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49604188      Online Users : 567
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/111728
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111728


    Title: 槓桿型指數型基金之追蹤誤差 : 以標的指數所屬產業分析
    Tracking Error of Leveraged Exchange : Traded Funds -analysis of industries of underlying indexes
    Authors: 林恩加
    Contributors: 岳夢蘭
    林恩加
    Keywords: 槓桿型/反向型ETF
    追蹤誤差
    產業
    Leveraged/inverse ETF
    Tracking error
    Industry
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-08-10 09:43:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文探討槓桿型/反向型ETF之追蹤誤差是否會因為追縱標的屬於不同產業而有差異。為此先將46檔具有顯著追蹤誤差之槓桿型/反向型ETF樣本分為七類不同的產業,並設定產業作虛擬變數放入多元迴歸模型中,結果為當追蹤指數屬於建築業、零售業及服務業之槓桿型/反向型ETF傾向得到較大的追蹤誤差,而追蹤指數屬於礦產業、製造業、水電業及金融業者,其追蹤誤差較小。追蹤誤差大之產業,其指數波動度也較大,推測指數波動度可能是造成特定產業追蹤績效不佳的原因。另外在本研究中也發現,追蹤礦產業、建築業及製造業指數之槓桿型/反向型ETF,其槓桿型績效優於反向型績效;而追蹤水電業、零售業、金融業及服務業指數之槓桿型/反向型ETF則是反向型績效優於槓桿型績效。其原因推測與ETF存在年限、ETF發行公司和指數成分股個數有關。
    This paper discusses whether the tracking error of leveraged/inverse ETF varies by industry of underlying indexes. We take 46 leveraged/inverse ETFs with significant tracking error into the samples, divide them into 7 different industries and set those industries as dummy variables in multiple regression models. The outcome shows that the tracking error tends to be larger if the underlying index of leveraged/inverse ETF belongs to construction, retails or service industries; otherwise, the tracking error tends to be smaller if it tracks the index from mining, manufacturing, utility or finance industries. The larger tracking errors may result from more volatile indexes of those industries. Besides, we also find that leveraged ETFs outperform the inverse ones if the index belongs to mining, construction or manufacturing industry; on the other hand, inverse ETFs outperform leveraged ones when the index comes from utility, retails, finance or service industry. The possible reasons may be the different characteristics of ETFs, such as the length of ETF’s existence, ETF’s issuer and the number of constituents in underlying index.
    Reference: Charupat, N., and Miu, P. (2011). The pricing and performance of leveraged exchange-traded funds. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(4), 966-977.
    Chu, P. K. K. (2011). Study on the tracking errors and their determinants: evidence from Hong Kong exchange traded funds. Applied Financial Economics, 21(5), 309-315.
    Drenovak, M., Urošević, B., & Jelic, R. (2014). European bond ETFs: tracking errors and the sovereign debt crisis. European Financial Management, 20(5), 958-994.
    Frino, A., Gallagher, D. R., Neubert, A. S., and Oetomo, T. N. (2004). Index design and implications for index tracking. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(2), 89-95.
    Grinblatt, M., and Titman, S. (1989). Mutual fund performance: An analysis of quarterly portfolio holdings. Journal of business, 393-416.
    Guo, K., and Leung, T. (2015). Understanding the tracking errors of commodity leveraged ETFs. In Commodities, Energy and Environmental Finance (pp. 39-63). Springer New York.
    Hill, J. M. (2016). The Evolution and Success of Index Strategies in ETFs. Financial Analysts Journal, 72(5), 8-13.
    Johnson, W. F. (2009). Tracking errors of exchange traded funds. Journal of Asset Management, 10(4), 253-262.
    Lu, L., Wang, J., and Zhang, G. (2009). Long term performance of leveraged ETFs.
    Miu, P., and Charupat, N. (2016). Leveraged Exchange-traded Funds: A Comprehensive Guide to Structure, Pricing, and Performance. Springer.
    Osterhoff, F., and Kaserer, C. (2016). Determinants of tracking error in German ETFs–the role of market liquidity. Managerial Finance, 42(5), 417-437.
    Pope, P. F., and Yadav, P. K. (1994). Discovering errors in tracking error. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 20(2), 27-32.
    Roll, R. (1992). A mean/variance analysis of tracking error. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 18(4), 13-22.
    Shin, S., and Soydemir, G. (2010). Exchange-traded funds, persistence in tracking errors and information dissemination. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 20(4), 214-234.
    Tang, H., and Xu, X. E. (2013). Solving the return deviation conundrum of leveraged exchange-traded funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(01), 309-342.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理研究所
    103357021
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103357021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    702101.pdf2103KbAdobe PDF246View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback