English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111283/142199 (78%)
Visitors : 48172877      Online Users : 733
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111821


    Title: 最適傳統與非傳統貨幣政策
    Optimal Conventional and Unconventional Monetary Policy
    Authors: 蘇醒文
    Contributors: 黃俞寧
    蘇醒文
    Keywords: 最適貨幣政策
    非傳統貨幣政策
    量化寬鬆
    動態隨機一般均衡
    Optimal monetary policy
    Unconventional monetary policy
    Quantitative easing
    DSGE
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-08-10 10:07:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在面臨2008年金融危機後嚴峻之需求面衝擊下,多國央行紛紛調降利率,甚至調降至零利率,以期望國家能盡速脫離經濟衰退。在利率調降的過程中,由於受零利率下限的限制,單純藉由傳統貨幣政策之調控,仍可能無法使經濟從嚴峻的需求面衝擊下恢復。因此,非傳統貨幣政策也在美國、日本、英國、歐元區等國家被央行所採行做為對抗經濟衰退的政策工具。在此背景下,我們想了解如何實施最適非傳統貨幣政策。
    在最適貨幣政策理論發展中,最適傳統貨幣政策發展較早,因此也較為完備。而在最適非傳統貨幣政策方面,前瞻指引(forward guidance)這項政策工具已被引入最適理論中來進行討論,但量化寬鬆(quantitative easing)直至今日還未被引入最適理論中來討論。
    因此,本文建構一個封閉的新興凱因斯模型(New Keynesian),開創性的將量化寬鬆引入最適貨幣政策理論中,來討論最適傳統與非傳統貨幣政策,也藉此與過去文獻比較施行量化寬鬆與未施行量化寬鬆之影響。
    After financial crisis occurred in 2008, countries, such as United States of America, United Kingdom, Japan and the euro area, have been mired in slow economic growth, compared with long-term, and have confronted with severe negative demand shocks which can’t be offset by zero interest-rate policy. Under the circumstance where zero lower bound was present, unconventional monetary policy was implemented by central bank of each country to end up the economic recession prospectively. As a result, we are interested in how to implement optimal unconventional monetary policy.
    The literatures regarding implementing conventional optimal monetary policy under demand shock were developed maturely. Forward guidance, one of unconventional monetary policy, was already developed in field of optimal monetary policy under impacted by demand shock, but quantitative easing has not been conducted in the theory of optimal monetary policy so far.
    Thus, we construct a close-economy by New Keynesian model to conduct quantitative easing into the theory of optimal monetary policy to discuss the optimal conventional and unconventional monetary policy, and to compare the difference corresponding to the previous literatures which without quantitative easing.
    Reference: Alter, A., & Beyer, A. (2014). The dynamics of spillover effects during the European sovereign debt turmoil. Journal of Banking & Finance, 42, 134-153.
    Bhattarai, S., Lee, J. W., & Park, W. Y. (2015). Optimal monetary policy in a currency union with interest rate spreads. Journal of International Economics, 96(2), 375-397.
    Benigno, P. (2009). Price stability with imperfect financial integration. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(s1), 121-149.
    Benigno, P., Eggertsson, G., & Romei, F. (2016). Dynamic Debt Deleveraging and Optimal Monetary Policy (No. 11180). CEPR Discussion Papers.
    Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. Journal of monetary Economics, 12(3), 383-398.
    Campbell, J. R., Evans, C. L., Fisher, J. D., & Justiniano, A. (2012). Macroeconomic effects of Federal Reserve forward guidance. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2012(1), 1-80.
    Clarida, R., Gali, J., & Gertler, M. (1999). The science of monetary policy: a new Keynesian perspective (No. w7147). National bureau of economic research.
    Corsetti, G., Kuester, K., Meier, A., & Müller, G. J. (2013). Sovereign risk, fiscal policy, and macroeconomic stability. The Economic Journal, 123(566).
    Corsetti, G., Kuester, K., Meier, A., & Müller, G. J. (2014). Sovereign risk and belief-driven fluctuations in the euro area. Journal of Monetary Economics, 61, 53-73.
    Cúrdia, V., & Woodford, M. (2016). Credit frictions and optimal monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 84, 30-65.
    De Bruyckere, V., Gerhardt, M., Schepens, G., & Vander Vennet, R. (2013). Bank/sovereign risk spillovers in the European debt crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(12), 4793-4809.
    Eggertsson, G. B., Ferrero, A., & Raffo, A. (2014). Can structural reforms help Europe?. Journal of Monetary Economics, 61, 2-22.
    Eggertsson, G. B., & Woodford, M. (2003). The Zero Bound on Interest Rates and Optimal Monetary Policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 139-233.
    Fiore, F. D., & Tristani, O. (2013). Optimal monetary policy in a model of the credit channel. The Economic Journal, 123(571), 906-931.
    Galí, J. (2015). Monetary policy, inflation, and the business cycle: an introduction to the new Keynesian framework and its applications. Princeton University Press.
    Harjes, T. (2011). Financial integration and corporate funding costs in Europe after the financial and sovereign debt crisis. Euro Area Policies: Selected Issues.
    Jung, T., Teranishi, Y., & Watanabe, T. (2005). Optimal monetary policy at the zero-interest-rate bound. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 37(5), 813-835.
    Krishnamurthy, A., & Vissing-Jorgensen, A. (2011). The effects of quantitative easing on long-term interest rates. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 215-265.
    Kydland, F. E., & Prescott, E. C. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of political economy, 85(3), 473-491.
    Williams, J. C. (2011). Unconventional monetary policy: Lessons from the past three years. FRBSF Economic Letter, 31, 2011.
    Williams, J. C. (2012). The Federal Reserve’s unconventional policies. FRBSF Economic Letter, 34(10), 1-9.
    Woodford, M. (2001). Fiscal requirements for price stability. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 33(3), 669.
    Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and Prices. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Woodford, M (2012). Methods of policy accommodation at the interest-rate lower bound. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Jackson Hole Symposium Conference Volume, August.
    Yeyati, E. L., & Panizza, U. (2011). The elusive costs of sovereign defaults. Journal of Development Economics, 94(1), 95-105.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經濟學系
    104258013
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104258013
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    801301.pdf600KbAdobe PDF2142View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback