政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/114421
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 95844/126434 (76%)
造訪人次 : 31595400      線上人數 : 422
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114421


    題名: 臺灣司法官社群文化中的中國因素──從清末民國時代中國追溯起
    The Chinese Element in the Culture of Judicial Officials in Taiwan: Tracing the Legacy from the Qing and Republican Era of China
    作者: 王泰升
    Wang, Tay-Sheng
    關鍵詞: 司法;法官;檢察官;司法獨立;黨化;貪瀆
    Judiciary;Judge;Prosecutor;Judicial Independence;Party-Oriented;Corruption
    日期: 2015-09
    上傳時間: 2017-11-07 10:44:36 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 中國自清末至民國在司法官任用制度上都要求經專業考試,但實踐上仍有不少未經考試及格者,且該項考試只重西式法律知識。制度上亦標榜司法獨立,但現實上司法官素質不佳,乃以傳統官僚體系思維採考核制度,司法官因而難以獨立於「上級」之外。國民政府則採司法黨化,以黨中心控制政治性案件裁判、以黨義影響一般民刑事裁判。司法官的待遇差使得傳統的制度性貪瀆難斷根,故社會對司法官觀感更差,越少人才願投入。上述民國中國的制度及文化主導了戰後臺灣的司法,導致臺灣民眾未能對司法官產生信賴感,故宜有所改變,讓法官成為夠格為獨立審判的專才。
    Professional ability was required in appointing a judicial official in the Qing and Republican era of China. However, many judicial officials in practice did not pass the professional examination; moreover, this examination only paid attention to Western-style legal knowledge. Judicial independence was provided in law, but a judicial official could not avoid the interference from his or her superior due to the assessment system in the traditional bureaucracy, which wanted to inspect the capability of inferior officials. The Nationalist Government further adopted a party-oriented judiciary. The central authority of the KMT (the Nationalist Party) gave instructions to the decisions of political lawsuits. The KMT also inculcated judicial officials with the ideology of the KMT in order to influence judgments in civil and criminal lawsuits. The low salary of judicial officials to a certain degree resulted in corruption, which had existed in imperial China for a long time. Therefore, the image of the judiciary was bad in Republican China; not surprisingly, the legal profession was hardly a priority in the career plans of students at the university. The institutions and culture of the judiciary in Republican China continued to dominate the judiciary in postwar Taiwan. As a consequence, the general public in Taiwan was mistrustful of judicial officials. The best way to reform Taiwan’s judiciary is to appoint those who have been experienced prosecutors or lawyers to be judges and then to allow them to independently adjudicate lawsuits because judges are known to have been capable of make wise decisions.
    關聯: 政大法學評論, 142, 1-46
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102398202015090142001
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202015090142001
    顯示於類別:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    142-1.pdf1956KbAdobe PDF127檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋