English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25743535      Online Users : 230
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114449


    Title: 加盟契約內容控制之理論與實務
    The Theory and Practices of Contents Control in Franchise Contract
    Authors: 楊宏暉
    Yang, Hung-Hui
    Keywords: 加盟;加盟契約;自治與體系拘束;誠信原則;定型化契約;內容控制;競業禁止;採購限制;企業經營者;獨家經銷
    Franchise;Franchise Contract;Autonomy and Restriction of System;Good Faith;Standard Contract;Control of Contract;Restriction of Purchase;Business Strife Limitation Clause;Undertaking;Exclusive Distribution
    Date: 2016-12
    Issue Date: 2017-11-07 15:01:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 加盟具有自治與體系之拘束,使得加盟關係在自治面向之外,又帶有高度團體利益的體系拘束,因加盟具有不對稱性與繼續性,對於契約內容控制有高度的需求。對於契約內容控制可出於不同的理由,如民法第71條、第72條或第247條之1。加盟業主除了追求自己的利益之外,也必須兼顧加盟者的商業利益,從而對契約條款的適法性,往往都需要利益衡量。本文對於實務及學理上常被討論之契約條款,諸如:最低銷售數量、品質準則與銷售準則、企業財務或人事高權、產品價格決定權、控制權約款、商品採購約款、獨家經銷約款、同意權保留約款、競業禁止約款等等,進行檢視及分析,並提出個人看法,以供實務參考。
    Franchise is characterized as the autonomy and restriction of system. The reasons behind contract control vary from § 71, § 72 and § 247-1. Franchisor must take the business interest of franchisee into consideration in addition to his interest. As a result, the balance of different interests is necessary to determine the legality of contract clauses. The common franchise contract clauses which are often discussed by theories and courts are reviewed and analyzed in this article, which includes the clause of minimum of sales, guidelines of quality and sales, power of finance and personnel, resale price maintenance, control rights, restriction of purchase, exclusive district, power of approval when change of franchisee, and restriction of competition by franchising and post-franchise. Personal opinions are also provided as a reference for court practices.
    Relation: 政大法學評論, 147, 1-81
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/10239820201612147001
    DOI: 10.3966/10239820201612147001
    Appears in Collections:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    147-1.pdf2011KbAdobe PDF179View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback